Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Amending Penal Code: Defining & Penalizing Unjust Vexation in the Philippines, Lecture notes of Criminology

Philippine Legal SystemConstitutional LawCriminal Law and Procedure

A bill introduced by senator miriam defensor santiago during the fourteenth congress of the philippines to amend article 287 of the revised penal code and create a new article 287-a defining the crime of unjust vexation and increasing its penalty. The bill explains the need for this amendment due to the vagueness and overbreadth of the existing provision, which may be unconstitutional.

What you will learn

  • What is unjust vexation according to the Revised Penal Code?
  • Why is Article 287, paragraph 2 of the Revised Penal Code considered vague and overbroad?
  • What is the proposed penalty for the crime of unjust vexation in the amended Revised Penal Code?

Typology: Lecture notes

2021/2022

Uploaded on 08/05/2022

hal_s95
hal_s95 🇵🇭

4.4

(620)

8.6K documents

1 / 4

Toggle sidebar

Related documents


Partial preview of the text

Download Amending Penal Code: Defining & Penalizing Unjust Vexation in the Philippines and more Lecture notes Criminology in PDF only on Docsity! . . ~~ ~, I , ) . I FOURTEENTH CONGRESS OF THE REPUBLIC ) ,![;[, -’..~ J.: .,> _ _ 8 2 . OF THE PHILIPPINES 1 . - I Third Regular Session 1 Introduced by Senator Miriam Defensor Santiago EXPLANATORY NOTE Unjust vexation is punished under the 2nd paragraph of Article 287 of the Revised Peiial Code: “Any other coercions or unjust vexations shall be punished by arrest0 menor or a fine ranging from 5 pesos to 200 pesos, or both.” It is a well-established doctrine that a criminal or penal legislation must clearly define 01’ specify the particular acts or omissions punished. Unlike the crimes of theft, murder and rape that are specifically defined in the Revised Penal Code, the definition of the crime of unjust vexation is conspicuously absent. Because of this Article 287, paragraph 2 of the Revised Penal Code that punishes “unjust vexation” sufrers from congenital defects and may be declared unconstitutional for the following reasons: a) Article 287, paragraph 2 of the Revised Peiial Code condemns no specific or definite act or omission thus failing to define any crime or felony; b) Said penal provision is so indefinite, vague and overbroad as not to enable it to be known what act is forbidden; c) Such vagueness and overbreadth result to violation of the due process clause and the right to be informed of the nature of the offense charged; and d) Such vagueness and overbreadth liltewise amount to an invalid delegation by Congress of its legislative power to the courts to determine what acts should be held criminal and punishable. The state having the right to declare what acts are criminal, within certain well defined limitations, has a right to specify what act or acts shall constitute a crime, as well as what act or acts shall constitute a crime. Hence, the instant bill seeks to provide a legal defiiiitioii for the crime of “unjust vexation” and provide the corresponding penalty for its commission. 1
Docsity logo



Copyright © 2024 Ladybird Srl - Via Leonardo da Vinci 16, 10126, Torino, Italy - VAT 10816460017 - All rights reserved