academic English persuasive speech, Cheat Sheet of English Language

Download academic English persuasive speech and more Cheat Sheet English Language in PDF only on Docsity! Hi everyone, my name is Sıla KISA, and I'm a first-year sociology student at Social Sciences University of Ankara. As students, we often feel the pressure to perform well in exams, but are these scores really the best measure of our intelligence and potential? Recently, I spoke to a friend of mine. Despite her hard work, her exam results disappointed her and she felt like a failure as if she wasn't smart enough. However, when we talked about his strengths and interests, it was clear that he had many talents that were not reflected in his grades. Today, I'll be discussing why exam scores may not be a reliable indicator of a student's abilities. First, we'll discuss the problems with relying solely on exam scores as a measure of intelligence. Then, we'll explore the causes of these problems and why exams can be biased and prioritize test-taking skills over intelligence. Finally, we'll address some common counterarguments and provide evidence to refute them. By the end of this talk, I hope to convince you that we need to move towards evaluation methods that truly reflect the diverse talents and abilities of all students. İf you have any questions feel free to interrupt me anytime. First of all, standardized tests are often used as a measure of intelligence, but they may not be reliable indicators. One problem is that exam scores do not necessarily reflect a student's true intelligence. According to a Youth Ki Awaaz article from 2018, intelligence is a complex concept that cannot be accurately measured by a single exam score. Therefore, relying solely on exam scores to determine a student's intelligence can lead to inaccurate evaluations and unfair outcomes. Another problem with relying solely on exam scores is that they may reflect test-taking skills more than intelligence. An article on Infinity Learn points out that standardized tests only measure a narrow range of skills, such as test-taking strategies, memorization, and time management. Therefore, students who are skilled at taking tests may score higher on exams, even if they are not necessarily more intelligent than their peers. One cause of these problems with exam scores is that exams often prioritize memorization over critical thinking. According to an article in Epigram, exams often test students' ability to recall information rather than their ability to analyze and apply it. Therefore, students who excel at memorization may score higher on exams, even if they are not necessarily more intelligent or capable than their peers. Second cause is that relying solely on exam scores can lead to harmful comparisons and stigmatization. As a Debatewise article points out, exams can create an unhealthy competition among students and cause those who score lower to feel inferior or ashamed. Therefore, relying solely on exam scores to measure intelligence can create a harmful academic environment that may negatively impact students' self-esteem and mental health. While there are those who argue that exam scores are a reliable measure of intelligence, this viewpoint overlooks the many problems and limitations of standardized tests. One common counterargument is that exams are objective and provide a level playing field for all students. However, this overlooks the fact that exams are often biased towards certain groups of students, such as those who come from wealthier backgrounds or have access to better test preparation resources. Another counterargument is that exams are necessary to measure academic achievement and hold students accountable for their learning. However, this ignores the fact that exams often fail to measure real-world skills such as creativity, problem-solving, and critical thinking, which are crucial for success in many fields. By acknowledging these counterarguments and providing evidence to refute them, we can better understand the limitations of relying solely on exam scores and work towards more comprehensive and equitable evaluation methods. In summary, while exams are commonly used to assess students' abilities, they may not be the best indicator of intelligence or potential. Exams prioritize memorization and test-taking skills over critical thinking and creativity, and relying solely on scores can lead to harmful comparisons and stigmatization. It is important to acknowledge the limitations of exams and develop more inclusive evaluation methods that consider the diverse talents and abilities of students. Ultimately, a student's worth should not be determined by their exam scores, but by their unique strengths and potential. Thank you for listening to me. References