Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Action for Defamation - Delict - Past Paper, Exams of Law

This is the Past Paper of Delict and its key important points are: Action for Defamation, Terms of Agreement, Claims for Damages, Loss of Income Claim, Terms of Insurance Policy, Disability Payment, Discretionary Sick-Pay Benefit, Contract of Employment

Typology: Exams

2012/2013

Uploaded on 02/15/2013

anushai
anushai 🇮🇳

4.4

(8)

97 documents

1 / 5

Toggle sidebar

Related documents


Partial preview of the text

Download Action for Defamation - Delict - Past Paper and more Exams Law in PDF only on Docsity! UNIVERSITY OF KWAZULU-NATAL, PIETERMARITZBURG EXAMINATIONS : NOVEMBER 2008 SUBJECT,COURSE AND CODE: DELICT (LAWS2DL) (LAWS3DL) DURATION : 3 HOURS TOTAL MARKS : 75 External Examiner : Mr R Scott Internal Examiner : Ms P Singh STUDENTS ARE REQUESTED, IN THEIR OWN INTERESTS, TO WRITE LEGIBLY PLEASE NOTE: THIS EXAM PAPER CONSISTS OF FIVE (5) PAGES PLEASE SEE THAT YOU HAVE THEM ALL INSTRUCTIONS: • Question 1 (ONE) is a compulsory question and must be answered. • In addition you must answer TWO questions from Section B. If a question consists of more than one part you must answer all parts to that question • Please pay attention to the mark allocation to make sure you apportion your time appropriately. • Questions can be answered in any order. However you must clearly indicate the question number you are answering. A failure to do so may result in a student losing all marks for the question which is not clearly marked with the correct question number. UNIVERSITY OF KWAZULU-NATAL, PIETERMARITZBURG EXAMINATIONS : NOVEMBER 2008 SUBJECT: DELICT PAGE 2 SECTION A THIS QUESTION IS COMPULSORY AND MUST BE ANSWERED QUESTION 1 In his address to the annual general meeting of the People First Party (PFP), Melon Kille, the leader of the party, proposes the adoption of a ‘People Against Crime’ campaign. She is reported in the Sunday Crimes newspaper as saying: ‘We must fight crime at all levels: from the top to the bottom. Our top government leaders are committing crimes. So is it surprising that crime is rampant throughout our society? I need hardly remind you that our former deputy president had to be fired from the Cabinet for corruption. And now he has the arrogance to promote violence and glorify the use of firearms by repeatedly calling for his machine gun.’ The former deputy president, Joseph Zama, institutes an action for defamation against the Sunday Crimes and Melon Kille. Mr Zama has not in fact been found guilty of corruption; he was charged with corruption after a High Court judge had found that a wealthy businessman had a ‘generally corrupt relationship’ with Zama. Ms Kille approaches you for advice. In the course of your answer explain the relevant law fully, including: 1.1 Will Mr Zama succeed in his action for defamation against either Ms Kille and / or the Sunday Crimes ? 1.2 Are there any defences which Ms Kille or the Sunday Crimes could raise against Mr Zama’s action? 1.3 Could other senior government leaders successfully bring an action for defamation against the Sunday Crimes or Melon Kille? In the course of your answer explain the relevant law fully, including the appropriate defences that might be raised by the Sunday Crimes and or Melon Kille. [25 MARKS]
Docsity logo



Copyright © 2024 Ladybird Srl - Via Leonardo da Vinci 16, 10126, Torino, Italy - VAT 10816460017 - All rights reserved