Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Comparative Analysis of Protein Recovery Methods - Prof. James Davenport, Assignments of Statistics

Solutions to practice problems related to constructing stem-and-leaf displays and histograms for the comparison of two protein recovery methods based on the fraction of protein recovered in thirteen runs for each method.

Typology: Assignments

Pre 2010

Uploaded on 02/10/2009

koofers-user-ohb
koofers-user-ohb 🇺🇸

10 documents

1 / 4

Toggle sidebar

Related documents


Partial preview of the text

Download Comparative Analysis of Protein Recovery Methods - Prof. James Davenport and more Assignments Statistics in PDF only on Docsity! Practice Problems # 04 – Solutions 1. Two methods were studied for the recovery of protein. Thirteen runs were made using each method, and the fraction of protein recovered was recorded for each run. The data are given below. Construct a comparative stem-and-leaf display (back-to-back stem plot) for the two methods. Method 1 0.32 0.35 0.37 0.39 0.42 0.47 0.51 0.58 0.60 0.62 0.65 0.68 0.75 Method 2 0.25 0.40 0.48 0.55 0.56 0.58 0.60 0.65 0.70 0.76 0.80 0.91 0.99 Back-to-back Stem-and-Leaf Plot for Protein Recovery Method 2 Method 1 5 2 3 2 5 7 9 8 0 4 2 7 8 6 5 5 1 8 5 0 6 0 2 5 8 6 0 7 5 0 8 9 1 9 Stems = tenths, leaves = hundredths 7|5 represents 0.75 2. A method was studied for the recovery of protein. Thirteen runs were made, and the fraction of protein recovered was recorded for each run. The data are given below. a. Construct a histogram beginning the first bin at 0.30 and make the bin width equal to 0.05. You will, of course, have to construct a frequency table first. Be sure to label the axes, provide a scale on each axis, and give the histogram a title. Frequency Distribution of protein Cumulative Cumulative Graph of protein Count Count Percent Percent Percent 0.300 To 0.350 2 2 15.38 15.38 |||||| 0.350 To 0.400 2 4 15.38 30.77 |||||| 0.400 To 0.450 1 5 7.69 38.46 ||| 0.450 To 0.500 1 6 7.69 46.15 ||| 0.500 To 0.550 1 7 7.69 53.85 ||| 0.550 To 0.600 2 9 15.38 69.23 |||||| 0.600 To 0.650 2 11 15.38 84.62 |||||| 0.650 To 0.700 1 12 7.69 92.31 ||| 0.700 To 0.750 1 13 7.69 100.00 ||| 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45 0.50 0.55 0.60 0.65 0.70 0.75 0.80 Fraction of Protein Recovered Fraction Fr eq ue nc y C ou nt b. Explain what you did with data values that fall on the end points. Comparing the frequency table, the histogram, and the data list below, it is obvious that the intervals are open on the left and closed on the right; e.g. the observation 0.35 is placed in the first interval. 0.32 0.35 0.37 0.39 0.42 0.47 0.51 0.58 0.60 0.62 0.65 0.68 0.75 3. a. Class Intervals Frequency Rel. Freq. Density .15 -< .25 8 0.02192 0.2192 .25 -< .35 14 0.03836 0.3836 .35 -< .45 28 0.07671 0.7671 .45 -< .50 24 0.06575 1.3150 .50 -< .55 39 0.10685 2.1370 .55 -< .60 51 0.13973 2.7946 .60 -< .65 106 0.29041 5.8082 .65 -< .70 84 0.23014 4.6028 .70 -< .75 11 0.03014 0.6028 n=365 1.00001 b.
Docsity logo



Copyright © 2024 Ladybird Srl - Via Leonardo da Vinci 16, 10126, Torino, Italy - VAT 10816460017 - All rights reserved