6 replies
You should try out a balance of the two. There should be some non negotiable absolutes. Like killing a man is bad,especially if that man is morally not in the wrong enough to justify being killed. Some societies practice cannibalism but you have to take a non relativistic position here. But in some others you can take a relativistic position. But you should keep in mind not to use that as an excuse for a moral free for all.
Lesson relativism can be any of a number of philosophic positions worried about your differences in ethical decision all over different people as well as civilizations. Illustrative lesson relativism holds that some individuals liquidate reality disagree as to what will be ethical; meta-honest lesson relativism holds in which such disagreements, no person is actually fairly wrong or right; along with prescriptive meaningful relativism contains which since cipher is right or even incorrect, we need to accept the behavior associated with some others no matter if we all don't agree around the ethical motive of computer.
to see other 4 answers
Related documents
Search questions by subject