appreciation_art_essay, Essays (high school) of English

Download appreciation_art_essay and more Essays (high school) English in PDF only on Docsity! APPRECIATION ART ESSAY Throughout history, people have argued about whether appropriation in art is good or bad. Appropriation is when you take something from somewhere else and use it differently. In art, appropriation means to use (or take) someone else's work, change it, and then change the meaning of the work. Many people, including art critics, art historians, and art lovers, see appropriation as good. However, others see it as wrong and immoral, and they think the increase in appropriation is destroying art. People think that art does "feed off itself" and that every piece of art, art movement, and art period is influenced and shaped by the ones that came before it. Artists have used each other's works to show different things throughout history. However, it is only now that the use of these works is being questioned on whether they are original or just a "carbon copy" of another work. "Appropriation Artists" are a group of artists who use other people's work without permission. Marcel Duchamp, Yasumasa Morimura, and Maria Kozic are just a few of these artists. Edouard Manet, Pablo Picasso, and Leonardo da Vinci are among the "Great Artists" who have influenced these artists so much that they have used their own works in their own. In the 1980s, appropriation seemed to be very popular and was a technique that was often used in commercials and ads. This is why the Pop Art Movement, which was most popular in the 1950s and 1960s, is a great example of appropriation. Artists like Clause Oldenburg, Andy Warhol, and Roy Lichenstein took everyday objects and turned them into works of art. These artists think that their work is a tribute to another artist. It is a way for them to learn more about the artist and how he works, runs, and does things. Whether you think appropriation is good or bad depends on how you feel about art. Those who know Da Vinci's "Mona Lisa" may also know Marcel Duchamp's version of the great piece, which he used without permission. He made an exact copy of the painting and gave the famous woman a bold black moustache and beard. Many people thought Duchamp's action was a form of vandalism and were disgusted by how he destroyed such a valuable thing. Duchamp's way of lowering the work's status as high art and pointing out Da Vinci's sexual ambiguity was to say that he did not care about them. Subjectively, this work by Duchamp is an insult to one of the best artists and works of art in history. It should be seen as a form of vandalism. His work makes fun of Da Vinci and the great man's skills. Even though art has no limits, people still ask, "When is it really art and when is it just trashing and vandalizing?" Even so, some works of art that use other people's work are very clever and interesting. The "Weeping Woman" painting by Pablo Picasso was used in an ad for Australian Air Express. It is very clever of them to put their logo, a symbol for them, into the painting. It looks like it is part of the painting, and, unlike Duchamp's, it goes well with the painting. Yasumasa Morimura is one of the best- known people who steal from other people. He has stolen works of art from some different artists. Edouard Manet's "A Bar at the Folies-Bergere, 1881-2" is used in "Daughter of Art History Theatre A, 1989," and "Olympia, 1863" is used in "Futago, 1988." He does not seem to change much, but he loves to make copies of art where he can put himself in the place of the women. Even though his work is similar to Manets's, it is also very different. For example, his version of "Olympia" is brighter, more modern, and has more details than the original. This backs up the idea that appropriation is not a form of theft or vandalism but rather a way to show how you feel about certain things. A question that supports appropriation is the idea that art "feeds off of itself." Andy Warhol, a Pop Artist, used Campbell's Soup cans in several of his works. "Campbell's Soup, 1965" is the one that everyone knows. A few years later, Australian artist Maria Kozic took ideas from Warhol's work to make her own. She broke the image of "Campbell's Soup" to make her piece, which she called "Masterpieces (Warhol), 1986." As you can see, this is a great example of how the same idea can be used repeatedly with different meanings each time. In the end, it is clear from the many talks and debates that the topic of appropriation in the art world is a significant one. It is a fundamental issue that can be viewed from both good and bad. It can be seen as a form of art or a