Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Research Methods in Psychology, Exams of Psychology

A series of multiple-choice questions related to research methods in psychology. The questions cover topics such as scales of measurement, reliability, validity, and different types of research. The document also includes a question about the benefits of conducting a literature review before writing a research proposal and a question about explaining data analysis in a research proposal. The questions are useful for students studying research methods in psychology.

Typology: Exams

2022/2023

Available from 11/18/2023

joseph-waihenya
joseph-waihenya 🇺🇸

3.7

(3)

72 documents

1 / 18

Toggle sidebar

Related documents


Partial preview of the text

Download Research Methods in Psychology and more Exams Psychology in PDF only on Docsity! Part 1 of 1 - 155.0/ 180.0 Points Question 1 of 24 Professor Adams is constructing a demographic questionnaire for use in a research project. One 4.0/ 4.0 Points question asks students to report whether they are currently living in an "urban", "suburban", or "rural" setting. This is an example of a/an: ! A. nominal scale B. ordinal scale C. interval scale D. ration scale Anss werr Keyy :: A Question 2 of 24 Which of the following represents a null hypothesis? 0.0/ 4.0 Points " A. Class A high school basketball teams who employ a sports psychologist will have a higher proportion of wins over the course of the season than comparable teams who do not employ a sports psychologist. B. There will be no difference in rate of skill improvement between college gymnasts who practice meditation and those who do not. Anss werr Keyy :: C FF eedbaa cc kk :: C Question 5 of 24 The of psychology—the diagnosis and treatment of psychological problems—is one 0.0/ 4.0 Points important application of the scientific discipline of psychology. A. clinical practice " B. treatment field C. addiction field D. mental health field Anss wee rr Kee yy :: A Question 6 of 24 is written by a single author or a small group of authors and usually gives a coherent 4.0/ 4.0 Points Power by presentation of a topic much like an extended review article. Edited volumes have an editor or a small group of editors who recruit many authors to write separate chapters on different aspects of the same topic. A. A professional journal B. A scholarly book ! C. A monograph D. An edited volume Anss werr Keyy :: C Question 7 of 24 When considering general criteria for high-quality research projects, replicability refers to the fact that: 4.0/ 4.0 Points A. the research design allows the researcher to control those factors that are central to the success of the project. ! B. another researcher, using the same procedures under the same circumstances to research the same question, would obtain comparable results. C. a well-designed research project could be carried out by a specific individual conducting research in the same field. D. the phenomena of interest must be quantified in some systematic way. Anss wee rr Kee yy :: B Question 8 of 24 Charlotte, an anthropologist, has been living in an Incan village for three years. During that time 0.0/ 4.0 Points Charlotte has become expert in Incan weaving by observing and imitating the master weavers in the community. For Charlotte, observing weaving constitutes: A. primary data B. secondary data C. informal data " D. nonempirical data Anss wee rr Kee yy :: A Question 9 of 24 Charlotte wrote a book about her experience as an anthropologist living in an Incan village for three 4.0/ 4.0 Points years and becoming an expert weaver. Her book was widely read by other anthropologists, including Mira, who is measure political conservatism. To test out his new 0.0/ 4.0 Points instrument, he asks people leaving their polling place on election day to report their degree of political conservatism on a scale of 1 (low) to 10 (high) and then complete his questionnaire. Results show that people who identified themselves as political conservatives also had the highest scores on his questionnaire. This is an indication of the of the new instrument. A. criterion validity B. content validity C. face validity " D. predictive validity Anss werr Keyy :: A Question 13 of 24 Don and Jane are studying aggression among preschool children. Separately, they each watch a 4.0/ 4.0 Points videotape of four children interacting in a playroom and then rate each child on the level of aggression displayed during the play session. They compare their completed ratings and are pleased to note they are highly similar. This is an example of reliability. ! A. interrater B. internal consistency C. equivalent form D. test-retest Anss werr Keyy :: A Question 14 of 24 Dr. Stevens is testing a 10-question measure of achievement motivation. He notes that if his 4.0/ 4.0 Points respondents agree with the first question, they tend to also agree with the other nine. Likewise, if his respondents disagree with the first question, they tend of disagree with the other nine. This is an indication of good reliability. A. interrater ! B. internal consistency C. equivalent form D. test-retest Anss wee rr Kee yy :: B Question 15 of 24 Professor Page is studying civic-mindedness among senior citizens. She administers a survey of civic 4.0/ 4.0 Points mindedness to a senior citizens group in early April, then again in early May. By comparing the two sets of scores, about psychological problems and establishes whether treatments are effective. " A. psychology B. addiction C. clinical practice D. professors Anss werr Keyy :: C Question 19 of 24 in psychology is conducted primarily for the sake of achieving a more detailed and accurate 4.0/ 4.0 Points understanding of human behavior, without necessarily trying to address any particular practical problem. A. Statistical research B. Qualitative research ! C. Basic research D. Applied research Anss werr Keyy :: C Question 20 of 24 In research proposal(s), specific hypotheses regarding findings are often stated. A. both quantitative and qualitative B. neither quantitative and qualitative ! C. a quantitative D. a qualitative Anss werr Keyy :: C Question 21 of 24 Describe three benefits of conducting a thorough review of existing literature before writing a research proposal. 4.0/ 4.0 Points 20.0/ 25.0 Points There are many benefits of conducting a thorough review of any source you may use when writing a research proposal. The first is saving time. If you first vet your source you don't waste your time reading and collecting data if you can see right away it's not going to be a good fit. Second, you want to make sure that you are understanding correct information. Third, it's important to review this information for credibility purposes. When people read your work, they make check your sources and the conduct a thorough review of your paper, so you want to ensure you are providing only the best sources. Commee ntt :: I'm not following 100% the second benefit you mentioned - more elaboration would have been helpful Question 22 of 24 Concepts, ideas, opinions, feelings, and other intangible entities are often labeled as 25.0/ 25.0 Points “insubstantial phenomena.” Select one of the following 3 phenomena that would be considered insubstantial, and explain two different ways — one qualitative and one quantitative — that you might measure it: a) the closeness of undergraduates’ social network friends; b) the “campus climate” at your university; c) “irrational exuberance” about the stock market. "Campus climate" can be measured by conducting a series of individual interviews followed by focus groups. The series of personal interviews and focus groups can better demonstrate personal experiences with climate at school. Those are examples of a qualitative way. A quantitative example would be sending out a survey campus- wide to try and pinpoint a pattern, if any, of areas they could improve. Question 23 of 24 In regard to quantitative research proposals, novice researchers often find it very challenging and25.0/ 25.0 Points tedious to explain in detail how the data will be analyzed and interpreted in their study. Explain why it is essential that the researcher not cut corners in this section of the proposal. It is important because if you do not know what the data you are looking at means, it can be misinterpreted and misused. If one small variable changes within the data everything can be changed by that one variable. It is important to know what data you are looking at means and why it's applicable to the proposal you are submitting. It could be the difference between obtaining funding for research or not. . Question 24 of 24 Graduate professors like to insist that the completion of thesis or dissertation research is not 25.0/ 25.0 Points
Docsity logo



Copyright © 2024 Ladybird Srl - Via Leonardo da Vinci 16, 10126, Torino, Italy - VAT 10816460017 - All rights reserved