Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Comparative Analysis Claims Evaluation: Ranking Effectiveness of Arguments, Study notes of Material Science and Technology

Cultural StudiesGlobalizationComparative LiteratureLinguistics

In this document, students are provided with a pre-writing exercise to evaluate the effectiveness of claims made in former students' argument-driven comparative analysis assignments. The exercise involves reading each claim, considering the criteria for an effective claim, and ranking them accordingly. Students are expected to take notes and be prepared to discuss and explain their reasoning to the class. The document also includes a homework assignment where students are required to draft their own comparative analysis claim and bring it to the next class.

What you will learn

  • Why is it important to evaluate the effectiveness of comparative analysis claims?
  • How can changing cultural contexts impact identity?
  • What are the criteria for an effective comparative analysis claim?

Typology: Study notes

2021/2022

Uploaded on 07/05/2022

allan.dev
allan.dev 🇦🇺

4.5

(85)

1K documents

1 / 1

Toggle sidebar

Related documents


Partial preview of the text

Download Comparative Analysis Claims Evaluation: Ranking Effectiveness of Arguments and more Study notes Material Science and Technology in PDF only on Docsity! Argument-Driven Comparative Analysis Pre-Writing Exercise: Evaluating Claims Directions: Read each of the claims below, which come from former students’ argument-driven comparative analysis assignments. Considering the criteria for an effective claim—and for a comparative analysis assignment in particular—you will rank the claims according to their effectiveness. Take notes for each claim and be prepared to discuss and explain the reasoning for your rankings to the class. 1 = Most effective / 6 = Least effective _____ 1. While Leonard and Gleiser both focus on technology in their arguments, I will argue that Gleiser does not directly discuss the crucial impact that globalization has on linguistic diversity. _____ 2. Changing cultural contexts (like Hill does) can lead to important realizations about identity because those new environments can cause people to challenge their cultural assumptions and revise their beliefs (like Ahmed does). _____ 3. Traves and Leonard both provide convincing evidence for the linguistic imperialism occurring throughout the world as it becomes more westernized, but only Traves offers a practical solution to the problem. Educating EFL learners to use English as a bridge language will reduce the tendency of language and technology consumers to view languages and cultures as hierarchical. _____ 4. While I agree with Gleiser’s assertion that technology is bringing the world closer together, I cannot accept the underlying either/or fallacy that drives his central claim. _____ 5. Even though diverse cultures consume the same global products, it does not mean that these products are creating a monoculture. Different cultural groups can assign unique meanings to the global products they consume and are not at the mercy of consumerism. _____ 6. Overall, I disagree with Leonard’s assertion that the world has already homogenized into a monoculture because he overlooks the deep-rootedness of one’s ethnic roots and tribal instincts. Homework: Now that you are able to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of a comparative claim, it is your turn to draft your own! Type or handwrite your claim and bring it to our next class. Be prepared to share and discuss.
Docsity logo



Copyright © 2024 Ladybird Srl - Via Leonardo da Vinci 16, 10126, Torino, Italy - VAT 10816460017 - All rights reserved