Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Temperature Dependence of Energy Loss in Gas-Filled Bouncing Balls: A Two-Parameter Model, Study notes of Physics

MechanicsMaterials ScienceThermodynamics

A two-parameter model to describe the temperature dependence of the coefficient of restitution (ϵ) for gas-filled balls such as tennis balls. The authors derive the model from physical laws and compare it to experimental data. The document also mentions related work on tennis ball bounce quality and impact on tennis racquet collisions.

What you will learn

  • How does the ideal gas law relate to the temperature dependence of ϵ in gas-filled balls?
  • What is the physical basis for the two-parameter model of temperature dependence for ϵ in gas-filled balls?
  • How does the coefficient of restitution (ϵ) change with temperature for gas-filled balls?

Typology: Study notes

2021/2022

Uploaded on 09/12/2022

bradpitt
bradpitt 🇬🇧

4.2

(9)

3 documents

1 / 4

Toggle sidebar

Related documents


Partial preview of the text

Download Temperature Dependence of Energy Loss in Gas-Filled Bouncing Balls: A Two-Parameter Model and more Study notes Physics in PDF only on Docsity! Temperature dependence of energy loss in gas-filled bouncing balls Martin Allen∗ International School Hannover Region, Bruchmeisterallee 6, D-30169, Hannover, Germany Bruce Allen† Max Planck Institute for Gravitational Physics (Albert Einstein Institute), Leibniz Universität Hannover, Callinstrasse 38, D-30167, Hannover, Germany (Dated: February 8, 2022) The “coefficient of restitution” ε is a measure of the energy which is retained when a ball bounces. This can be easily and accurately measured in an “at home” experiment. Here, for a gas-filled ball such as a tennis ball, we construct a simple two-parameter model to describe how ε changes as a function of temperature. A comparison with data shows good agreement. I. INTRODUCTION The bouncing of a ball demonstrates important fea- tures of mechanics, including the conservation of energy and momentum, the conversion of energy between poten- tial and kinetic, and the loss of energy to heat. An in- teresting experiment is to drop a ball from a fixed height and to measure how high it bounces. The less energy is lost during the bounce, the closer it returns to the start- ing height. Accurate measurements are possible by using a cell-phone to film the bounce, and then examining in- dividual frames. We conducted such an experiment with a (not so fresh) tennis ball, varying the temperature of the ball, and recording how the bounce height varied. Internet re- search shows that others have done such experiments with a variety of balls. Typically, the data is fit to an ad-hoc model which is not derived from physical laws. Here, we derive a simple model from physical laws and compare it to data.1 II. BOUNCING BALLS The Internet offers many slow-motion films of bouncing balls. Some are remarkable, for example, a (solid rubber) golf ball moving at 67m/s bouncing off a steel plate2, filmed at 40 000 frames/s and at even higher speeds and frame rates3. Slow-motion films of gas-filled balls such as tennis balls, soccer balls, and basketballs exhibit similar behavior4. These images show that balls are compressed and de- formed when they bounce. Their kinetic energy is con- verted into potential energy and stored: the deformed ball behaves like a compressed spring. It then “springs back” to a round shape, converting stored potential en- ergy back into kinetic energy, and jumping into the air. In this process, some energy is converted into heat, and consequently each bounce of the ball is lower than the previous one. A detailed discussion of the mechanisms at work, and citations to the literature, can be found in a highly cited paper by Cross5. How can we model the bounce for a gas-filled ball? In FIG. 1. The ball just before the bounce with downwards velocity vb, at the moment of maximum compression, and just after the bounce with (smaller) upwards velocity va. The coefficient of restitution is ε = |va|/|vb|. this paper, we assume that the energy is stored in the compressed gas of the ball, and examine how changing the temperature of that gas, and hence its pressure, af- fects the bounce. Related work models how tennis balls grip and are spun up when they strike the ground at different angles6,7, measures the room-temperature coefficient of restitution of tennis balls and Superballs8, describes a testing method for tennis ball bounce quality9, and mod- els the impact of the coefficient of restitution on ten- nis racquet collisions and serves10, but does not examine temperature dependence. III. COEFFICIENT OF RESTITUTION Consider a ball of mass m, which is released at rest from height hb above a level surface and moves up and down along a vertical line. Here, and throughout this pa- per, the subscript b indicates “before the bounce”. After release, the ball moves downwards under the influence of gravity, accelerating until it impacts the floor. Just before that impact, denote its vertical velocity by vb, as shown in Fig. 1 We neglect air resistance, so equating the potential and kinetic energy gives Eb = 1 2mv 2 b = mghb, where g = 9.8 m/s 2 is the acceleration of gravity, and Eb is the ball energy, which is constant until it hits the ground. One way to quantify the loss of energy during the bounce is via the “coefficient of restitution” ε. This di- mensionless number is the ratio of the vertical speed of the ball just after the bounce |va| to the vertical speed of ar X iv :2 20 2. 03 03 4v 1 [ ph ys ic s. ed -p h] 7 F eb 2 02 2 2 the ball just before the bounce ε = |va|/|vb|, (3.1) where subscript a means “after the bounce”. Since the speed after the bounce is smaller than before the bounce, the coefficient of restitution lies in the range 0 ≤ ε < 1. While it is not given this name, the coefficient of resti- tution is described by Newton in discussing the relative velocities before and after bouncing impacts (reflexion) for balls made of wool, steel, cork, and glass. Cook11 pro- vides a detailed discussion of Newton’s approach, which is often called “Newton’s experimental law of impacts”. The literature uses be two symbols to denote the coeffi- cient of restitution: e and ε. We follow the latter con- vention, to avoid confusion with the base of the natural logarithm, Euler’s number e = 2.71828 . . . . The ball’s energy Ea after the bounce can be expressed in terms of ε and the energy before the bounce. Just be- fore and after the bounce, the potential energy vanishes, and all of the energy is kinetic, given by 1 2mv 2, where v is the vertical velocity. The ratio of energies is then Ea Eb = mv2a/2 mv2b/2 = ( va vb )2 = ε2, (3.2) where we have used Eq. (3.1) in the final step. The ratio of heights before and after the bounce may also be expressed in terms of the coefficient of restitution ε. After the bounce, the ball moves upwards, slowing down, and transforming its kinetic energy into potential energy. It reaches the maximum height ha at the mo- ment when the velocity drops to zero, and (neglecting air resistance) all of the kinetic energy is converted to potential energy mgha. Thus mgha mghb = ha hb = Ea Eb = ε2, (3.3) where in the final step we have used Eq. (3.2). It’s not easy to measure the speed of the ball just be- fore and after the bounce to compute ε directly from the definition in Eq. (3.1). However, it is straightforward to measure the release height and the bounce height. So in an experiment, the coefficient of restitution may be determined via ε = √ ha hb , (3.4) where hb is the height from which the ball is dropped, and ha is the maximum height which the ball reaches after the bounce. For a very bouncy ball, ε is close to 1, and for a very “dead” ball, ε is close to 0. IV. MODELING THE ENERGY STORED DURING THE BOUNCE In our model, there is no air resistance, so the energy of the ball is constant before the bounce, and has a smaller but constant value after the bounce. The difference be- tween these is the energy which is lost (converted) to sound and heat during the bounce. The remaining en- ergy, which is stored, is Ea. Here, we model the energy stored in the bounce. For this purpose, we treat the ball as a rubber bag containing gas under pressure. When the ball hits the ground and comes to a stop, it is deformed, and its in- terior volume V decreases by a small amount ∆V , as shown in Fig. 1. This decrease in volume does not “come for free” in the energetic sense, because changing the vol- ume requires that a force be applied against the pressure of the gas inside the ball. FIG. 2. A box with a sealed right wall which slides in and out without friction. The net force F on the wall is the product of the area of the wall and the difference between the inside and outside pressures. To compute the energy needed, consider a “cubical box” model of a ball, as shown in Figure 2, where one wall is free to slide in and out, but sealed against gas loss. This is like a bicycle pump, in which a sliding piston com- presses air, or an internal combustion engine, where an air-fuel explosion creates pressure that moves a piston. Suppose that the box is filled with gas at pressure Pin, and surrounded by gas at pressure Pout. The net outwards force acting on the moving wall is F = (Pin − Pout)A, where A is the area of the wall. To push the wall in by a small distance d, we must do work W = Fd = (Pin − Pout)Ad. This changes the volume of the box from LA to (L − d)A, so the decrease in the box volume is ∆V = Ad. Thus, the work we have done may be written W = (Pin − Pout)∆V . This is the same for any sealed volume containing a gas, regardless of its shape. Thus, the amount of work done in compressing the gas inside the ball, and hence the energy stored, is Ea = (Pin − Pout)∆V. (4.1) Here, Pin is the pressure of the gas inside the ball, and Pout is the pressure of the air outside the ball (normally 1 atmosphere or 1 bar or 100kPa). Note that because the fractional change in volume ∆V/V is small, the interior
Docsity logo



Copyright © 2024 Ladybird Srl - Via Leonardo da Vinci 16, 10126, Torino, Italy - VAT 10816460017 - All rights reserved