Assignment 2 - Managing a Successful Computing Project - Pass, Assignments of Computer Science

Download Assignment 2 - Managing a Successful Computing Project - Pass and more Assignments Computer Science in PDF only on Docsity! Huynh Minh Huy | GCD210173 GCD1001 | UNIVERSITY OF GREENWICH Assignment 2 MANAGING A SUCCESSFUL COMPUTING PROJECT 1 | P a g e ASSIGNMENT 2 FRONT SHEET Qualification BTEC Level 5 HND Diploma in Computing Unit number and title Unit 19: Managing a Successful Computing Project Submission date 26/02/2023 Date Received 1st submission Re-submission Date Date Received 2nd submission Student Name Huynh Minh Huy Student ID GCD210173 Class GCD1001 Assessor name Ly Quynh Tran Student declaration I certify that the assignment submission is entirely my own work and I fully understand the consequences of plagiarism. I understand that making a false declaration is a form of malpractice. Student’s signature Huy Grading grid P5 P6 P7 M3 M4 D2 4 | P a g e Table of Contents Chapter 1: Introduction. ...................................................................................................................................... 6 Chapter 2: Research Analysis. (P5) .................................................................................................................. 7 I. Analyze and Evaluate Data. .....................................................................................................................................7 II. Evaluate which tools have selected. ................................................................................................................. 21 Chapter 3: Recommendations. (P6) .............................................................................................................. 22 I. Summary about proposed system. .................................................................................................................... 22 II. List of features for proposed system. ............................................................................................................... 23 III. Advantages and disadvantages of proposed system. ................................................................................. 24 IV. Recommendations to address challenges and issues for the proposed system. ............................. 25 Chapter 4: Reflections. (P7) ............................................................................................................................. 27 I. Fill out the log book form. .................................................................................................................................... 27 II. Evaluation of the research result. ...................................................................................................................... 36 III. Some of my own learning from the project. .................................................................................................. 37 IV. Things I need to explore more. ........................................................................................................................... 39 Conclusion. ............................................................................................................................................................ 40 References ............................................................................................................................................................. 41 5 | P a g e Table of Figures Figure 1: Data of Gender. ......................................................................................................................................................7 Figure 2: Data of Age. .............................................................................................................................................................8 Figure 3: Data of are they a student. ................................................................................................................................9 Figure 4: Data of are they using the tool. .................................................................................................................... 10 Figure 5: Data of how satisfied are they with the current e-waste recycling options available to them. ..................................................................................................................................................................................................... 11 Figure 6: Data of how willing are they to pay a fee for e-waste recycling services. ................................... 12 Figure 7: Data of how helpful are the features of the app. ................................................................................... 13 Figure 8: Data of what type of electronic waste do they typically recycle. .................................................... 14 Figure 9: Data of do they believe that e-waste recycling tools are effective in reducing environmental impact. ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 15 Figure 10: Some of answer for the question: "What suggestions would you have for improving the e- waste recycling process?". ................................................................................................................................................ 16 Figure 11: Some of answer for the question: "What motivates you to recycle electronic waste?". ..... 17 Figure 12: Some of answer for the question: "What do you like most about the tool?". .......................... 18 Figure 13: Some of answer for the question: "What challenges have you encountered when trying to recycle e-waste?". ................................................................................................................................................................. 19 Figure 14: Some of answer for the question: "What challenges do you think the e-waste recycling tool will face when it is used?". ....................................................................................................................................... 20 Figure 15: Google Forms.................................................................................................................................................... 21 Table of Tables Table 1: Demographic. ...........................................................................................................................................................9 Table 2: Project Logbook - Week 1. ............................................................................................................................... 29 Table 3: Project Logbook – Week 2. .............................................................................................................................. 32 Table 4: Project Logbook - Week 3. ............................................................................................................................... 35 6 | P a g e Chapter 1: Introduction. In Assignment 1, I carried out planning and research for the development of an e-waste recycling tool. So, in Assignment 2, I will present and discuss the results obtained from the work done in Assignment 1. This report will focus on specific categories to clearly present the outcomes of the research.  Logbooks, lessons learned, project outcomes, and an assessment of the project process.  Examine the usage of approved research tools and processes for correctness and authenticity.  The project management approach and practices are being evaluated. In Assignment 1, I stated the project's major goal and aims for developing an e-waste recycling solution. In this report, I will concentrate on the tasks involved in reaching the goal and goals. The outcomes will be reported depending on progress toward the stated goals and objectives.  Main aim of the project: The main aim of a project on E-waste recycling tools is to properly manage and dispose of electronic waste in an environmentally responsible manner, in order to reduce the negative impact of electronic devices on the environment and to promote sustainability. This can involve developing and implementing new tools and processes to help with the collection, transportation, and processing of electronic waste, as well as promoting awareness of the importance of responsible e-waste management. The ultimate goal is to minimize the environmental impact of electronic devices and reduce the amount of waste generated from these devices over time.  List of Objectives to achieve the aim (Note Objectives should be SMART):  Develop an efficient and effective E-waste recycling tool that can be easily integrated into existing waste management systems.  Increase the amount of electronic waste recycled by 50% within the next two years through the implementation of the E-waste recycling tool.  Reduce the environmental impact of electronic waste by properly disposing of hazardous materials through the E-waste recycling tool.  Ensure that the E-waste recycling tool meets all relevant regulations and industry standards.  Increase public awareness of the importance of proper e-waste disposal and encourage greater participation in e-waste recycling through the implementation of the E-waste recycling tool. 9 | P a g e Figure 3: Data of are they a student. Look at the pie chart, we can see that the majority of the respondents are students, accounting for 65.5% of the total survey population, while the remaining 34.5% are non-students. The data suggests that the e-waste recycling tool is an appealing concept for students who may be more aware of environmental issues and have a greater sense of responsibility towards the planet. This data may provide useful information for developers of the e-waste recycling tool to tailor their marketing and outreach efforts towards this specific target audience. Frequency Percent Gender Male 35 58.3 Female 25 41.7 Total 60 100.0 Age 18 - 25 26 43.3 25 - 30 19 31.7 > 30 15 25.0 Total 60 100.0 Student or not Student 39 65.0 Non - Student 21 35.0 Total 60 100.0 Table 1: Demographic. 10 | P a g e To summarize the demographic, I created this table that shows the frequency and proportion of each element. The data presented in the table shows the demographic breakdown of the participants in the study. The sample consists of 60 individuals, with 35 participants identifying as male (58.3%) and 25 identifying as female (41.7%). In terms of age, the majority of participants (43.3%) fall in the 18-25 age range, with 31.7% of participants falling in the 25- 30 age range and 25.0% of participants being over 30 years old. Regarding student status, 65.0% of participants are students, while the remaining 35.0% are not students. These findings provide insight into the makeup of the study sample and may have implications for the interpretation of the study's results. Figure 4: Data of are they using the tool. Look at the pie chart, we can see that the extent to which the e-waste recycling tool has been used or not shows a promising result with 66.7% of participants indicating that they have used the tool. This suggests that the tool is being adopted and gaining some traction among users, which is a positive sign for the effectiveness of the tool. The 33.3% of participants who have not used the tool could be due to a variety of reasons, such as not having access to the tool or not having any electronic waste to recycle. Nonetheless, this data indicates that the tool has some level of usage and has the potential to be used even more widely in the future. 11 | P a g e Figure 5: Data of how satisfied are they with the current e-waste recycling options available to them. The bar graph measuring participants' satisfaction with the e-waste recycling options available to them provides an insightful overview of how users feel about the options they have. With a scale ranging from 1 to 5, the graph shows that most users were satisfied with the options available to them, with 41.7% of users rating the options as very satisfactory. The 26.7% of users who rated the options as average may suggest that there is room for improvement, while the 10% and 8.3% of users who rated the options as not very satisfactory or satisfactory but not great, respectively, indicate that there may be some dissatisfaction among a small portion of users. Overall, the graph provides valuable information for improving e-waste recycling options and addressing any potential issues that users may have. 14 | P a g e Figure 8: Data of what type of electronic waste do they typically recycle. Based on the results obtained from the chart above, we can see that the kind of e-waste participants usually recycle shows that old smartphones are the most commonly recycled items, with a high percentage of 63.3%. This can be attributed to the fact that smartphones are ubiquitous in modern society, and their frequent upgrade cycle means they quickly become outdated and are disposed of. The graph also shows that other electronic items such as televisions, computer monitors, and laptops are also commonly recycled, with percentages ranging from 45% to 61.7%. However, it's worth noting that some electronic items such as game consoles, keyboards, and speakers have a lower percentage, indicating that people may be less aware of the possibility of recycling these items. Overall, the graph suggests that people are aware of the need for e-waste recycling and are recycling a range of electronic items. 15 | P a g e Figure 9: Data of do they believe that e-waste recycling tools are effective in reducing environmental impact. The measurement chart measuring participants' beliefs about the effectiveness of e-waste recycling tools shows that 46.7% of respondents believe that these tools are very effective in reducing environmental impact. This is a positive response that suggests that people are aware of the benefits of e-waste recycling and are actively engaged in using such tools. However, it is important to note that 31.7% of participants do not believe that these tools are effective at all. This suggests that more education and awareness campaigns are needed to inform people about the benefits of e-waste recycling and the environmental impact of electronic waste. Finally, 21.7% of participants are unsure, indicating that more information and resources should be made available to help people make informed decisions about e-waste recycling. 16 | P a g e Figure 10: Some of answer for the question: "What suggestions would you have for improving the e-waste recycling process?". Here are some of the suggestion from the participant who took part in the survey. It's encouraging to see that participants are willing to make suggestions for improving the e-waste recycling process. The fact that they are actively engaged in this issue shows that they are concerned about the impact of e-waste on the environment. Some common suggestions include develop more advanced and efficient e-waste processing technologies, make e-waste recycling more accessible for low-income communities, and educate people on how to properly dispose of batteries and other hazardous e-waste materials. It's important to consider these suggestions and work towards implementing them to create a more sustainable future for our planet. 19 | P a g e Figure 13: Some of answer for the question: "What challenges have you encountered when trying to recycle e-waste?". According to the participants’ comments, it seems that one of the major challenges faced when trying to recycle e-waste is the lack of awareness and knowledge on how to recycle properly. Delegates also mentioned the difficulty in finding e-waste recycling facilities, especially in rural areas, and also mentioned the difficulty in finding places to put the e-waste recycling tool. Additionally, some participants reported challenges related to recycling and shipping costs, making it a less viable option. It is clear that there are still some significant challenges in the e-waste recycling process and it is important to address them to encourage and enable more people to participate in e-waste recycling. 20 | P a g e Figure 14: Some of answer for the question: "What challenges do you think the e-waste recycling tool will face when it is used?". According to participants' feedback, there are a number of challenges that an e-waste recycling tool can face. Firstly, some participants pointed out that it is necessary to find a suitable place to put the tools because the tools cannot be placed arbitrarily, so many people think that finding a place to put the e-waste recycling tools is necessary. Second, some participants mentioned that there can be logistical issues and transportation costs to recycling facilities, especially for those living in remote areas. Additionally, some delegates also mentioned the issue of information security, because when bringing electronics to recycle, it is possible that some items such as phones and laptops still have the owner's personal information. Therefore, it is necessary to strictly manage the problem to avoid the case that customer information may be exposed and cause a bad reputation for us. Another challenge mentioned is that some people may not be aware of the importance of e-waste recycling or may not be motivated to do so. Finally, there are concerns about the efficiency and transparency of the recycling process, which could affect people's trust in the tool. Overall, while the e-waste recycling tool may have great potential, it will need to overcome these challenges to be successful in promoting more responsible e-waste disposal. 21 | P a g e II. Evaluate which tools have selected. As a project manager, I used Google Forms as an appropriate platform for gathering both qualitative and quantitative data to obtain user input in a cost-effective manner. Within a defined scope, the survey was developed to encompass team members and stakeholders.  Google Form. Google Forms is a popular and effective tool for conducting surveys in a formal and professional manner. Its user-friendly interface makes it accessible to a wide range of users, and its customizability allows researchers to tailor surveys to their specific needs and objectives. With various question types and multimedia elements like images and videos, Google Forms offers a seamless data collection process where all responses are automatically collected and stored in an organized format. Furthermore, it's free and readily accessible, making it a viable option for researchers and organizations with limited resources. Overall, Google Forms is a versatile and reliable tool that offers numerous benefits for researchers and professionals across different fields. Figure 15: Google Forms. 24 | P a g e III. Advantages and disadvantages of proposed system. As electronic devices continue to become an integral part of our daily lives, the issue of e-waste management has become increasingly pressing. In response, e-waste recycling tools have been proposed as a solution to the problem of electronic waste disposal. These tools aim to recover valuable materials from electronic devices and reduce the amount of waste sent to landfills. However, as with any new technology, there are both advantages and disadvantages to implementing e-waste recycling tools. Based on the research conducted on the use of e-waste recycling tools, there are both pros and cons to implementing them. On the positive side, the majority of the survey respondents noted that e-waste recycling tools offer an environmentally friendly solution for disposing of electronic devices. In addition, this tool can recover valuable materials from electronic devices, such as metals, plastics, lead, mercury, cadmium, and glass. This aims to reduce waste in landfills, decrease carbon emissions in e-waste processing, and lessen the need to extract new resources from the earth. However, there are also some disadvantages associated with e-waste recycling tools. One of the main concerns of respondents was the implementation cost to deploy these tools, both in terms of the hardware and software required to run them, as well as the personnel required to operate and maintain them. First, the initial investment and ongoing maintenance costs can be significant, which may make it difficult for some organizations to justify the expense. Another disadvantage mentioned by some respondents is the possibility of data breaches when handling electronic devices, they are concerned about the security and privacy of personal data that may be contained in the electronic devices. There is a risk that personal information could be retrieved from the devices during the recycling process, which could lead to privacy and security concerns. Therefore, these data need to be managed properly during the recycling process. Last but not least, while e-waste recycling tools can reduce the amount of waste going to landfills, they may also contribute to the environmental impact of the mining and production of new electronic devices, which can be energy-intensive and have significant carbon footprints. 25 | P a g e IV. Recommendations to address challenges and issues for the proposed system. As the issue of e-waste disposal becomes increasingly pressing, more organizations are turning to e-waste recycling tools as a solution. However, the implementation of these tools comes with its own set of challenges and issues. In this context, it is important to identify and address these challenges to ensure that e-waste recycling tools are effective and sustainable. Based on the challenges and shortcomings identified, several solutions are proposed to enhance the e-waste recycling tool.  Human Resources: To compete in the market, businesses must have a professional and experienced crew. In my experience, I urge that the company give more competent and responsible human resources to ensure project completion on time and optimum efficiency.  Increase Awareness: It is essential to raise public awareness of the benefits of e-waste recycling to encourage more people to recycle their electronic devices. As a result, we have run various campaigns, advertisements and educational programs to raise public awareness of the benefits of e-waste recycling.  Time Management: A detailed work plan is required for a project to run smoothly, and it should include the start and finish times, job responsibilities, and task descriptions. However, keeping such a strict timetable may put unnecessary strain on personnel. As a remedy, I propose instituting a two-weekend rule to provide employees a more comfortable work-life balance.  Develop Better Recycling Technology: E-waste recycling technology is still evolving and there is a need to develop better and more efficient recycling processes to handle the growing volume of e-waste. Therefore, we will continue to research and develop new recycling technology to handle the growing volume of e-waste.  Finance: Financial considerations are crucial for any successful project. I propose allocating an additional budget to cover unforeseen expenses and to ensure that the project has the resources necessary to meet its objectives. It's also important to provide competitive salaries that match the skills and experience of the team members in order to attract and retain high-quality human resources. Ultimately, adequate financial resources are a key factor in the success of any project. 26 | P a g e  Enhance Collection Networks: It is important to improve collection networks for e- waste recycling, especially in developing countries. And to do this, we have established more e-waste collection points or improved existing ones.  Legal Procedures: To make a product available to consumers, it must go through various procedures, including legal procedures. Therefore, I must handle all legal requirements to ensure my product is accessible to the intended audience. 29 | P a g e  Did I find it useful to complete the tasks?  Yes.  How well have I performed? What did I contribute?  I performed well and contributed to the project's initial planning phase.  What can I improve on next week?  Better time management.  How might this learning apply in the future?  Prioritizing tasks and managing time efficiently can increase productivity and contribute to the success of the project. Tasks planned for next week  Develop a preliminary wireframe of the tool's user interface.  Reach out to potential collaborators for further discussions.  Define the initial technical requirements for the tool's development. Points to consider:  Which tasks are priority?  Developing a preliminary wireframe of the tool's user interface.  Have you set aside sufficient time for completion?  Yes. Project plan status to date (on, ahead, behind).  I completed on time. Table 2: Project Logbook - Week 1. 30 | P a g e  Week 2: Name: Huynh Minh Huy Project Title: Development of an Innovative E-waste Recycling Tool Date: 12/01/2023 Update on weekly research/tasks achieved Points to consider:  What have you completed?  Developed a preliminary wireframe of the tool's user interface.  Reached out to potential collaborators for further discussions.  Defined the initial technical requirements for the tool's development.  Did you fulfil task requirements?  Yes.  Are you on track and within deadlines set?  Yes.  Did you need to make any changes to your project management plan?  No. Any risks and/or issues identified?  Limited technical expertise may pose a challenge during the development phase.  Potential collaborators may have conflicting schedules or priorities. 31 | P a g e Points to consider:  Did you identify risks/issues with a lack of skills required for undertaking research/tasks?  No.  Did you identify any additional risks/issues that have an impact on the project management plan?  No. Problems Encountered  None. Points to consider:  What barriers did you face?  None.  How did you overcome them?  N/A. New ideas and change of project direction  Considered integrating a social media campaign to raise awareness of e-waste recycling.  Discussed the possibility of partnering with local schools to promote e-waste recycling among students. Points to consider:  How did I feel when I had to deal with tasks/problems?  Focused and determined to meet project goals. 34 | P a g e Points to consider:  Did you identify risks/issues with a lack of skills required for undertaking research/tasks?  No.  Did you identify any additional risks/issues that have an impact on the project management plan?  No. Problems Encountered  Difficulty in identifying potential promotional partners with aligned goals and values. Points to consider:  What barriers did you face?  Limited availability of relevant contacts.  How did you overcome them?  Conducted additional research and outreach to expand network. New ideas and change of project direction  Considered developing a mobile app for the e-waste recycling tool. Points to consider:  How did I feel when I had to deal with tasks/problems?  Resilient and resourceful in finding solutions  Did I find it useful to complete the tasks?  Yes.  How well have I performed? What did I contribute?  I performed well and contributed to the project's promotional and technological planning phase. 35 | P a g e  What can I improve on next week?  Continuing to explore potential partnerships and collaborations.  How might this learning apply in the future?  Perseverance and flexibility can lead to creative solutions and opportunities. Tasks planned for next week  Continue developing content for the social media campaign.  Research potential funding sources for the project.  Conduct further exploration of potential app integrations. Points to consider:  Which tasks are priority?  Continuing to develop content for the social media campaign.  Have you set aside sufficient time for completion?  Yes. Project plan status to date (on, ahead, behind).  I completed on time. Table 4: Project Logbook - Week 3. 36 | P a g e II. Evaluation of the research result. As a project manager responsible for the development of an e-waste recycling tool, it was essential for me to conduct thorough research to evaluate the tool's effectiveness and identify areas for improvement. The research process involved both quantitative and qualitative methods to gather data from various stakeholders, including potential users, recycling companies, and environmental organizations. The findings from the research provided valuable insights into the tool's performance and highlighted specific areas that require further attention. One of the significant findings of the quantitative research was the positive feedback received from users who tested the e-waste recycling tool. They appreciated the tool's environmental benefits and convenience, which allowed them to recycle their electronic waste from the comfort of their homes. However, the research also revealed that the usage of the tool was still relatively low, indicating a need for more promotion and awareness campaigns to encourage users to adopt this eco-friendly solution. The quantitative approach provided a comprehensive understanding of the tool's impact on intended outcomes, allowing me to identify and track its effectiveness over time. On the other hand, the qualitative research approach provided more in-depth insights into users' actual experiences using the e-waste recycling tool. Through open-ended interviews and feedback forms, users were free to share their thoughts and suggestions regarding the tool's design, functionality, and overall user experience. The results showed that although the tool's environmental benefits were appreciated, some users found the user interface and navigation to be challenging, which affected their overall experience. This approach also highlighted the need to provide more educational resources and guidance to users to help them understand the recycling process better. Overall, the qualitative approach allowed me to gain a deeper understanding of users' experiences and identify specific areas for improvement that would enhance the tool's usability and user experience. The research evaluation showed that the e-waste recycling tool has the potential to be an effective and sustainable solution for electronic waste disposal. However, there is still room for improvement in terms of usability, user experience, and awareness. The findings from the research will guide future development and improvement of the tool, which will address the 39 | P a g e tool can significantly facilitate this process. Overall, learning Slack has been a valuable experience that has broadened my skillset as a project manager. IV. Things I need to explore more. As the project manager responsible for creating an e-waste recycling tool, I have gained significant knowledge about the topic. However, there are still several areas that I need to explore further to improve the tool and make it more efficient. Here are some of the areas that I need to explore more in-depth to upgrade the tool in the future. First, I need to explore more about the different types of electronic devices and their recycling requirements. Electronic devices have different components and materials that require different handling and recycling methods. Thus, it is important to gain a deeper understanding of these differences to improve the recycling process and ensure that no valuable materials are wasted. Secondly, I need to explore the feasibility of incorporating artificial intelligence (AI) into the recycling process. AI has the potential to automate and streamline the recycling process, making it more efficient and cost-effective. Thus, it is crucial to explore this area further and assess its potential benefits and drawbacks. Thirdly, I need to explore more about the regulatory requirements and compliance standards for e-waste recycling. Compliance with regulations is essential to ensure that the recycling process is conducted in an environmentally friendly and sustainable manner. Hence, gaining a deeper understanding of the regulations and standards will help me ensure that the e-waste recycling tool meets the necessary requirements. Last but not least, I need to explore more about the social impact of e-waste recycling. While the environmental benefits of e-waste recycling are clear, its social impact is less understood. Thus, it is essential to explore this area further and assess the potential benefits and drawbacks of e-waste recycling on society. Overall, as the project manager responsible for creating an e-waste recycling tool, there are several areas that I need to explore further to improve the tool and make it more efficient. By gaining a deeper understanding of electronic devices and their recycling requirements, exploring the feasibility of incorporating AI, understanding regulatory requirements and compliance standards, and assessing the social impact of e-waste recycling, I can develop an upgraded e-waste recycling tool that is environmentally friendly, sustainable, and socially responsible. 40 | P a g e Conclusion. After conducting extensive research on the project of E-waste recycling tools, it is evident that there is a growing need for effective and efficient e-waste management solutions. The potential environmental impact of improperly disposed of electronic waste is significant, and e-waste recycling tools have emerged as a promising solution to address this issue. The research conducted has identified several areas where e-waste recycling tools can be improved. The most significant issues include improving the user experience and interface design, providing more educational resources and guidance for users, adding new features to enhance the app's functionality, and emphasizing security and privacy to protect users' personal information. Despite these issues, both quantitative and qualitative research indicates that the e-waste recycling tool is a promising solution with the potential to significantly reduce electronic waste's environmental impact. With the right improvements, it is possible to increase the tool's adoption and usage, leading to more significant environmental benefits. Overall, the research evaluation recommends that future versions of e-waste recycling tools should prioritize user experience and make it easier for users to navigate and access information on the recycling process. The app should also provide more features to assist users in the recycling process, such as recycling tips, material recovery statistics, and cost estimates for the recycling process. Additionally, there should be more emphasis on security and privacy to ensure users' personal information is protected. In conclusion, with the right improvements and greater awareness of the importance of responsible e-waste management, e-waste recycling tools have the potential to make a significant difference in reducing electronic waste's environmental impact. It is essential to continue to invest in the development of these tools and ensure that they are user-friendly and effective in promoting sustainable waste management practices. 41 | P a g e References Wikipedia, n.d. Google Forms. [Online] Available at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_Forms [Accessed 20 02 2023]. Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)