Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Baby Boomer Retirement March 2008, Papers of Business English

Baby Boomer Retirement March 2008

Typology: Papers

2022/2023

Uploaded on 12/17/2023

linh-dieu-13
linh-dieu-13 šŸ‡»šŸ‡³

1 document

1 / 2

Toggle sidebar

Related documents


Partial preview of the text

Download Baby Boomer Retirement March 2008 and more Papers Business English in PDF only on Docsity! Baby Boomer Retirement March 2008 Over the course of the next two decades, an average of 10,000 baby boomers per day will reach retirement age. Their retirement will cause a surge in federal spending. (See ā€œWill Aging Boomers Lose Benefits? Medicare and Social Security Need Serious Financial Help,ā€ USA Today, January 17, 2008.) ā€œA tsunami is building and ready to hit future generations, but this one wonā€™t be set off by earthquakes or other natural disasters. Instead, it will be a fiscal calamity created by the failure of government and business leaders to deal with the financial drain of millions of retiring baby boomers.ā€ ā€”David Walker, U.S. Comptroller General This is the first year the oldest of the nationā€™s baby boom generationā€”the 79 million Americans born between 1946 and 1964ā€”become eligible to collect retirement benefits from the federal government. The retirement of the baby boom generation will dramatically alter the balance between the nationā€™s working- age population and retirement-age population. In 2007, there were roughly five people 20 to 64 years old for every person 65 and older. By 2030, when the youngest of the baby boomers turn 65, that number is projected to be less than three. These changes in the U.S. age profile have important implications for govern- ment programs that provide retirement benefits. Since both Medicare and Social Security are financed primarily through payroll taxes, the retirement of the baby boomers will decrease the ratio of workers funding the system to retirees receiving program benefits. In their most recent testimony on the long-term budget outlook, the Congressional Budget Office projected that the number of taxable workers per Social Security beneficiary will decline from 3.2 currently to 2.1 in 2030. As this ratio falls, the two programs face looming fiscal crises. In their 2007 annual report, the trustees of the Social Security trust funds project that by 2017 Social Security benefit payments will have exceeded payroll tax revenues. The 2007 annual report from the trustees of the Medicare trust fund projects a more imminent threat: Projected tax revenues used to fund the Medicare program will fall short of expenditures for 2007 and all subsequent years. Fiscal policy watchers have warned that maintaining the status quo of government spending on these programs sets the federal budget on an unsustainable path. The Government Accountability Office calculates that preventing a long-term fiscal shortfall would require double-digit annual economic growth every year for the next 75 years. This scenario appears unlikely, given that the Social Security trustees project average annual growth in real GDP to be 1.9 percent over the next 75 years, a slower rate than observed historical averages. As a result, addressing the fiscal challenges facing government retirement benefit programs could neces- sitate drastic policy measures that create a heavy economic burden on future generations. The GAO projects that balancing the budget in 2040 would require as much as a 60 percent cut in total federal spending or a 100 percent increase in federal taxes. But less extreme policy actions can be taken. For example, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke suggested in a recent speech that policy steps to promote greater national and private saving, financial education, investment in human capital, and participation in the labor force could indirectly lessen the fiscal burden on future generations. He further stated that it should be a priority to reform entitlement programs in a manner that minimizes reliance on deficit spending and enhances the incentives to work and save. By Christopher J. Martinek, Senior Research Associate, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis The views expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official positions of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, the Federal Reserve System, or the Board of Governors.
Docsity logo



Copyright Ā© 2024 Ladybird Srl - Via Leonardo da Vinci 16, 10126, Torino, Italy - VAT 10816460017 - All rights reserved