Case analysis on a case study in the state of haryana, Summaries of Law of Evidence

Download Case analysis on a case study in the state of haryana and more Summaries Law of Evidence in PDF only on Docsity! CASE ANALYSIS State Of Punjab vs Karnail Singh 2003 (11) SCC 271 Submitted to : Prof. Adwitiya Prakash Tiwari Submitted By : Pratyaksh Jain Course : BA.LLB (5th year) URN : 2019-B-07022000 INTRODUCTION : "State of Punjab v. Karnail Singh, 2003 (11) SCC 271" is a case of substantial importance in the context of Indian criminal law and constitutional interpretation. This legal matter was heard and decided by the Supreme Court of India in the year 2003 and is prominently documented in Volume 11 of the Supreme Court Cases, appearing on page 271 (2003 (11) SCC 271). The judgement rendered in this case has played a pivotal role in shaping and clarifying legal principles in India and continues to be a reference point for various legal issues. At its core, this case revolved around intricate legal issues and a set of factual circumstances that triggered a significant legal decision. The case concerned criminal proceedings in the state of Punjab, and its outcome provided valuable guidance on several aspects of the Indian legal system. It offered insights into the interpretation of the Constitution, the scope of individual rights and freedoms, and the balance between the powers of the state and the rights of citizens.In the wake of this judgement, many legal professionals, scholars, and policymakers have extensively analysed its implications. It has been cited in subsequent legal proceedings and has influenced jurisprudence in India. The case of "State of Punjab v. Karnail Singh" exemplifies the role of the judiciary in upholding the rule of law and safeguarding the fundamental rights enshrined in the Indian Constitution. This introduction provides a glimpse into the significance and broader impact of this case. To delve deeper into the specific legal issues, factual background, and the precise outcome of the case, one would need to refer to the detailed case records and legal commentaries available through legal databases and scholarly literature. FACTS :1 Gurdial Singh (deceased) had five brothers namely Piara Singh, Swaran Singh, Charan Singh, Dev Singh and Kewal Singh. Piara Singh and the deceased used to live in their fields in Dera where they had installed a tube well. Accused Karnail Singh and Nirmal Singh belong to their village. They also used to live in a Dera near Piara Singh Dera and died. As the deceased forbade relationship with Sito, wife of accused Karnail Singh, enmity arose between the accused and the deceased. On the night of 26.1.92, Piara Singh and the deceased were resting in the Dera after eating. Their brother Swaran Singh also came there to irrigate the fields using his tube well. At about 11:00 pm, Swaran Singh asked the deceased to go and check whether the fields were being watered properly. The deceased went out to inspect the fields. After some time, Piara Singh and Swaran Singh (PW 1 and 2) heard the cries of the deceased for help. Immediately they came out and saw both the accused armed with guns dragging the deceased to their Dera. At that time their Dera was illuminated by an electric lamp. When they tried to help the deceased, Nirmal Singh fired his gun at the deceased causing him to fall on the ground, while accused Karnail Singh attacked the deceased with a Kirpan. When Piara 1 https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1009272/