Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Case Presentation Sharad Birdichand v state of Maha, Cheat Sheet of Law of Evidence

Case Presentation Sharad Birdichand v state of Maha with brief facts, analysis and relevant section

Typology: Cheat Sheet

2021/2022

Uploaded on 03/27/2023

bhumika25hooda
bhumika25hooda 🇮🇳

1 document

1 / 12

Toggle sidebar

Related documents


Partial preview of the text

Download Case Presentation Sharad Birdichand v state of Maha and more Cheat Sheet Law of Evidence in PDF only on Docsity! Sharad Birdhichand Sharda v State of Maharastra 17 July, 1984, 1984 AIR 1622, 1985 SCR (1) 88 Manju, the victim, married the appellant Sharad Birdhichand on 11th February 1982. deceased was looking forward to a married life of merriment but was subject to ill-treatment According to the prosecution on March 17th, 1982, the appellant called Manju to the Pearl Hotel where he introduced her to Ujvala. On 11th June 1982 around 11 p.m. Manju accompanied by Anuradha( Wife of Appellant 2) and her children returned to the flat. Brought Dr Lodha who lived 1 ½ KM away. Dr Gandhi also came and both of them declared Manju dead and the cause of death was unatural death. ESSENTIAL FACTS ISSUES 1. Whether the letters written by the deceased can be termed as a Dying Declaration as under Section 32(1) of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872? 2. Whether the appellant can be convicted solely on the basis of circumstantial evidence? JUDGEMENT OF THE CASE APPEAL ALLOWED AND CONVICTION SET ASIDE Last seen theory Motive to constitute comple chain of evidence Principles of cases of death by poison Admissible under 32(1) till the time transaction bear proximate relation to the death of person making dying decleration Benefit of doubt to the accused when prosecution cannot fully prove their case even if accused not able to prove his innocence RELIANCE ON CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE ADMISSIBILITY UNDER SEC 32(1) BENEFIT OF DOUBT ADMISSIBILITY OF LETTERS AND ORAL STATEMENT UNDER SEC 32(1) Some of the letters and oral testimony admissible as it shows state of mind of person and what prompted them to commit suicide Test of proximity not too literal Written statement of deesaed can be used to judge probative/legal validity of testimony regarding oral statement made by the deceased. Justice Varadarajan gave a concurring opinion denying the admissibility of the letter under sec 32(1) as they did not form part of the "transaction" leading to death. Lois Lane and Lex Luthor got married to each other in 2014. The couple lived peacefully together but after six months together disputes arose between them. Lois complained to her friend Jimmy through letters ,on several occasions, about harassment by Lex and her in-laws. In some of these letters she mentioned that her husband and in-laws locked her in her room the whole day and did not give her any food. And her husband also once said to her I wish sometimes, that you go to sleep and never wake up. On March 30th 2015 Lois was admitted in the hospital with 80% burns. She passed away on the way to the emergency room. Also another relevant piece is that Lena Luthor, sister of Lex, before the incident. hadLex and Lois had come to her house for a party and they left together after the party. CLASS DISCUSSION Thankyou!
Docsity logo



Copyright © 2024 Ladybird Srl - Via Leonardo da Vinci 16, 10126, Torino, Italy - VAT 10816460017 - All rights reserved