Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Computer Security Lecture 36: Privacy Laws and Rights - Prof. Eunjin Jung, Study notes of Computer Science

A lecture note from a computer security course, dated april 22, 2005, discussing privacy laws and rights. It covers the definition of privacy, confidentiality, and potential embarrassment or distress. The document also explores classical privacy rights, such as unreasonable intrusion on seclusion, appropriation of name or likeness, and publication of private facts. The lecture notes also discuss the limitations of privacy rights in the context of technology, including the collection and sale of data in public places and the lack of protection for electronic communications. The document concludes by discussing specific privacy laws, such as the family educational rights and privacy act and the health insurance portability and accountability act.

Typology: Study notes

Pre 2010

Uploaded on 03/11/2009

koofers-user-6fn
koofers-user-6fn 🇺🇸

10 documents

1 / 10

Toggle sidebar

Partial preview of the text

Download Computer Security Lecture 36: Privacy Laws and Rights - Prof. Eunjin Jung and more Study notes Computer Science in PDF only on Docsity! April 22, 2005 -- Lecture 36 22C:169 Computer Security Douglas W. Jones Department of Computer Science Privacy Laws Privacy Privacy is "the expectation that confidential personal information disclosed in a private place will not be disclosed to third parties, when that disclosure would cause either embarrassment or emotional distress to a person of reasonable sensitivities." RONALD B. STANDLER, ESQ, 1997 What does confidential mean? Why potential embarrassment or distress? Some privacy rights are old Ban on reading other people's mail, Rabbi Gershom of Mainz, 960-1040 Privacy of First Class Mail in US Ex parte Jackson, 1878, decided on 4th amendment grounds Privacy of telegraphic communications ICC act of 1887 requires subpoena, 3/4 of states guarded this by 1900 Privacy of telephone communications Federal Communications Act of 1934 Observations Delay between Development of new technology and Extension of obvious privacy rights under the 4th ammendment Has been far too long for comfort Focus of legislation has been on creating exceptions to privacy rights in order to allow "reasonable" law enforcement efforts. Shouldn't 4th amendment and telegraph law automatically apply to E-mail? Current law: Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986 Public electronic communication providers must ensure privacy of subscribers. Subscribers of free E-mail services might be the advertisers, not the users! protection of E-mail in transit no protection of stored E-mail no protection of internal business E-mail Disclosure of E-mail by the recipient Sender owns copyright on the text Recipient may disclose content Except if sender has reasonable expectation of privacy, e.g. if recipient is a doctor, lawyer or professor.
Docsity logo



Copyright © 2024 Ladybird Srl - Via Leonardo da Vinci 16, 10126, Torino, Italy - VAT 10816460017 - All rights reserved