Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Supreme Court Cases and FTC Regulations on Deceptive Advertising: A Comprehensive Overview, Quizzes of Mass Communication

An in-depth analysis of key supreme court cases, including valentine v. Chrestensen and central hudson gas & electric co. V. Psc, and the federal trade commission's (ftc) regulations on deceptive advertising. It covers the four-part test for regulating commercial speech, the ftc's definitions of deceptive ads, and the remedies available for combating deceptive advertising. Additionally, it discusses the role of self-regulation through organizations like the national advertising division, national advertising review board, and children's advertising review unit.

Typology: Quizzes

2011/2012

Uploaded on 04/26/2012

cfmckay
cfmckay 🇺🇸

9 documents

1 / 2

Toggle sidebar

Related documents


Partial preview of the text

Download Supreme Court Cases and FTC Regulations on Deceptive Advertising: A Comprehensive Overview and more Quizzes Mass Communication in PDF only on Docsity! TERM 1 Valentine v. Chrestensen, 1942 DEFINITION 1 U.S. Supreme Court said advertising received no First Amendment protection TERM 2 Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, 1976 DEFINITION 2 purely commercial speech receives First Amendment protection.But government may regulate ads that are false, misleading, or deceptive or promote illegal products or services.Central Hudson Gas & Electric Co. v. PSC, 1980. The Court articulated the Central Hudson test. TERM 3 four-part test developed by the Supreme Court in Central Hudson DEFINITION 3 1.) Is the expression eligible for protection under the First Amendment?If the ad is false, deceptive, misleading or promotes illegal activities or products, the answer to this question is no, and the case ends here.2. Is the asserted government interest in regulation (reason for regulating) substantial?3. Does the regulation directly advance the government interest?4. Is the regulation narrowly tailored to achieve the desired objective? Is there a reasonable fit between the government interest and the regulation? TERM 4 The FTCs definitions of a deceptive ad DEFINITION 4 An ad is deceptive if it contains a representation, omission or practice that is material and likely to mislead consumers acting reasonably [to their detriment].The FTC now tends to focus its regulatory efforts on deception that may cause consumers physical or economic harm. TERM 5 The two basic questions the FTC asks DEFINITION 5 CONSUMER PERCEPTION: What claims does the ad convey to reasonable consumers?SUBSTANTIATION: Does the advertiser have competent and reliable evidence to substantiate those claims?The FTC looks to the net impression the ad conveys to consumers.Companies are responsible for all claims, express and implied, conveyed to reasonable consumers.Claims may be conveyed non-verbally.Claims may be conveyed comparatively.Ads may be deceptive by omission.Fine-print disclosures wont generally correct a misleading net impression.
Docsity logo



Copyright © 2024 Ladybird Srl - Via Leonardo da Vinci 16, 10126, Torino, Italy - VAT 10816460017 - All rights reserved