Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Understanding Tort Reform's Impact on Personal Injury Lawsuits in Hot Coffee Documentary, Exercises of History

Tort ReformArbitration LawPersonal Injury LawsuitsTort LawContract Law

A guide to the 'hot coffee' documentary, which explores the concept of tort reform and its impact on personal injury lawsuits. The guide includes terms to know, questions to answer while viewing the film, and actions to take to protect access to the civil justice system. Topics covered include punitive damages, caps on damages, mandatory arbitration, and judicial elections.

What you will learn

  • What is a major misconception the public has had about the 'hot coffee' lawsuit with Stella Liebeck vs. McDonald's?
  • How much were the Gourley's awarded in damages?
  • What is the intended purpose of tort reform?
  • How much were the jury's compensatory and punitive damages awards for Mrs. Liebeck?
  • What was McDonald's initial offer for the medical problem?
  • What happened to Judge Oliver Diaz in the 2009 election?

Typology: Exercises

2021/2022

Uploaded on 11/05/2022

JohnnyLTree
JohnnyLTree 🇺🇸

2 documents

1 / 3

Toggle sidebar

Related documents


Partial preview of the text

Download Understanding Tort Reform's Impact on Personal Injury Lawsuits in Hot Coffee Documentary and more Exercises History in PDF only on Docsity! Name _ Period "Hot Coffee" Documentary Guide Directions: First, review the Terms to Know section to understand concepts this film will address. Then, answer the questions in each section as you view the film. Terms to Know • Punitive damages: damages exceeding simple compensation and awarded to punish the defendant; purpose is to change behavior of the wrongdoer. • Tort Reform: refers to laws passed on a state-by-state basis which place limits or caps on the type or amount of damages that may be awarded in personal injury lawsuits. • Caps on damages: refers to a law that limits the amount a jury can award for damages regardless of the facts of the case. • Mandatory arbitration: a process by which parties "agree " to have a third party arbitrator (single arbitrator or a panel), instead of a jury or judge, resolve a dispute. • Arbitration clause: clause in a contract that requires the parties to resolve their disputes through an arbitration process. Answer the following questions as you view the documentary. Exhibit 1: The Public Relations Campaign l . The family of Stella Liebeck explains that there are many people with a "distorted view" of this case. Identify at least one major misconception the public has had about what !hey think they know about "hot coffee" lawsuit with Stella Liebeck vs. McDonalds. 2. Summarize the coffee burn incident that occurred with Stella Liebeck. 3. McDonald's first offered $ on what was initially a $ medical problem. 4. According to their manual, what was the holding temperature supposed to be for the McDonald's water?: degrees 5. The Stella Liebeck vs. McDonald's trial revealed that McDonald's had over __ _ previous complaints about burns from hot beverages. 6. In what percentages did the jury assign blame in the hot coffee lawsuit against Mc Donalds? Liebeck: ___ % McDonalds: % 7. The jury awarded Mrs. Liebeck $160,000 in compensatory damages and $ __ _ million in punitive damages. 8. The punitive damage award was reduced to $ _ 9. According to the documentary, tort reform is intended to t he likelihood that you can bring a lawsuit. 10. Briefly explain some of the lawsuits mentioned which were distorted when reported/spoken about by the media. 11. How does the documentary portray former President Bush? Exhibit 2: Caps on Damages 12. One of the most common types of tort reform is called caps on _ 13. Why did Colin suffer severe brain damage? 14. After a three week trial, the jury found that Dr. Knolla's negligence caused Colin's brain injury and awarded the Gourley's $ million in damages. < 15. The jury did not know that the law in Nebraska capped all damages. The verdict was reduced to $ million. 16. What is the difference between economic and non-economic damages? 17. . What state is used as an example to show the 'myth' of health care costs? Exhibit 3: Judicial Elections 18. The 2010 U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission grants corporations the right to give campaign contributions, allowing for even greater corporate influence in electing judges. 19. Oliver Diaz was a judge on the Mississippi Court of Appeals for 5 years before he was appointed to the Mississippi Supreme Court in March 2000. In November 2000, he was up for _
Docsity logo



Copyright © 2024 Ladybird Srl - Via Leonardo da Vinci 16, 10126, Torino, Italy - VAT 10816460017 - All rights reserved