Counter Urbanisation: A Process of Population Movement towards Rural Areas, Exercises of Technology

Download Counter Urbanisation: A Process of Population Movement towards Rural Areas and more Exercises Technology in PDF only on Docsity! Counter urbanisation Lorre eee Merlot Mee relic Cm Counter - Urbanisation Gentrification / Suburbanisation BEM Cec tcl R Renner mele by J. Short What has caused counter urbanisation? Negative reaction to city life Many people want to move away from the city life e.g. pollution and the problems associated with it. Aspirations of a quite country life Land and House prices are cheaper in rural areas Higher personal car ownership and increase in public transport have allowed access to the are in a easier way. Between 1981 – 1996 rural areas gained a million jobs due to an increase in technology allowing industries to locate in these areas. The rising demand for second homes and earlier retirement has increased the movement of people from the city to the countryside. Improved road systems and increased car ownership. Push Factors from the city Increasing house prices Crime Rates Traffic congestion Air pollution Social Changes Effects on Rural Areas Small industrial units are being sited on the main roads leading into the settlement. Young can not afford to buy in the village. This causes resentment. Another problem that occurs is that new comers may not appreciate the traditional values of village life. The spread of the rural urban fringe. Modern housing estates are built on the edges of settlements Former green land sites are built on Old properties are converted and modernised Effects on the Inner City The people who leave the inner city tend to be qualified and skilled. This leaves behind an untrained workforce. They are usually home owners People left behind are usually working class, semi skilled. Population decline means that the city looses out on local taxation revenue e.g. council tax. This means less funds for the key facilities decrease. Effect 1: professional families and retired migrate to the villages. Replace labouring families. The socio –economic profile of the area changes. Purpose changes from agricultural to a diverse mix of professions. Effect 2: Less closure of Shops and Services This has been avoided due to the increasing proportion of people returning to rural areas. e.g. Craven Districy, North Yorkshire, Schools have been saved by young families moving into the area. Effects depend upon how close the village is to the urban centre. Villages closer to the city are the most likely to experience counter urbanisation – people like the idea of commuting quickly. Summary of Counter urbanisation 1. Counter urbanisation is a process in which certain groups of people, often the better off, leave urban areas for rural areas. 2. Counter urbanisation generally occurs whn urbanisation reaches a high level. It is a complex process because some people will still be moving to urban areas as others are leaving. 3. The movement out from city centres is service is based on age, income and lifestyle. It has contributed to what is seen as the inner city problem with local authorities having to face the problems left behind. 4. The expansion of counter urbanisation gives rise to pressures on the rural fringe. To some extent these can be tackled by setting up specically protected green belt zones. Dissatisfaction with Counter Urbanisation This could be due to journey times or prefer city life. They move back to the city Developers are providing measures to deal with problems in inner cities, Security, Town houses etc. Evidence of change •The population structures of the town are changing from a once ageing village to a number of young people in the area. •A large proportion of the people are working outside of the town •25% of St Ives population commute to London every day. The Effects on St Ives •There have been a considerable number of new housing developments around the periphery of St Ives. •There has been an increase in new exclusive apartments in and around the town and particularly along the river Ouse. •People in St Ives have a higher income compared to the rest of the UK with higher incomes they can afford the higher travel costs to London, which may be for petrol or train fares. •Increasing demand for riverside apartments as a result of a large percentage of people wanting to retire to St Ives •There is an increasing proportion of people who can afford the rising cost of property (commuters) and the people who work on the farms, part time wages or training schemes. There is some resistance to the building of more homes from the local residents, but many of these do not want their newly chosen environment changed. The increased use of St Ives Railway Station •Farm buildings are being turned into luxury property around St Ives •The double in value of the property in the area. •The increase in construction of council housing in the area. •The increase rate at which farm building conversions are taking place. •Current Policy in ST Ives : Any further developments must make a positive contribution to the overall character of the area.