Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Identifying Arguments in Passages: Exercise and Analysis, Exams of Physiology

An assignment for a university course on critical thinking, focusing on the identification of arguments in various passages. The assignment includes five passages, each requiring students to determine whether it contains an argument and, if so, to identify the conclusion and premises. The passages cover a range of topics, including ethics, communication, and marketing, and use various indicators such as 'therefore' and 'so'. The document also includes an example of a real-world argument about the marketing of infant formula in developing countries.

Typology: Exams

2023/2024

Available from 05/17/2024

carol-njeri
carol-njeri 🇺🇸

4.5

(2)

1.7K documents

1 / 4

Toggle sidebar

Related documents


Partial preview of the text

Download Identifying Arguments in Passages: Exercise and Analysis and more Exams Physiology in PDF only on Docsity! CPHL 214 Assignment #1Identifying Arguments 2024 new update Toronto Metropolitan University EXERCISE 1. 1: Identifying Arguments For each of the following passages, determine whether it does or does not contain an argument, and give reasons for your judgment. If the passage does contain an argument, indicate the conclusion. 1. People normally believe what others tell them unless there is reason to be suspicious. This reliance on other people is called depending on testimony. - This is not an argument. The first sentence is a statement made by the person and the second sentence is giving a definition of the act. It is like an informal definition of the statement. 2. To know any claim with certainty, you have to know you are awake. To know you are awake, you have to prove you are awake. Nobody can prove that he is awake. Therefore, no one can know any claim with certainty - This does contain an argument. The conclusion in this passage is – no one can know any claim with certainty. The indicator used is – therefore. The first, second and third sentences are the premises that are used to support the conclusion. 3. Every loyal citizen must demonstrate his loyalty to the state by taking an oath. To be credible, that oath must be sworn on a religious text. No atheist can swear an oath on a religious text. So we can see that no atheist can demonstrate his loyalty to the state. - This passage contains an argument. The conclusion is – we can see that no atheist can demonstrate his loyalty to the state. The indicator word is –so. The previous sentences are premises which eventually add to why they can’t demonstrate their loyalty (the conclusion). 4. Mathematics is not the queen of the sciences, because it is not a science at all. - This sentence is an argument. The first half is the conclusion – mathematics is not the queen of science. The second half is the premise. The indicator word is – because. The premise is – it is not a science at all. It supports the conclusion. 5. “If you want to be successful in business on a long-term basis, you must match your operational expertise with an ethical code of conduct practiced in every phase of your business.”
Docsity logo



Copyright © 2024 Ladybird Srl - Via Leonardo da Vinci 16, 10126, Torino, Italy - VAT 10816460017 - All rights reserved