Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Criminal Homicide - Criminal Law - Past Paper, Exams of Criminal Law

This is the Past Paper of Criminal Law which includes Property Damage, Child Pornography, Life Sentence for Possession, Child Pornography etc. Key important points are: Criminal Homicide, Common Law Principles, Homicide Statutes, Circumstances Manifesting Extreme, Negligent Homicide, Provisions of Penal Code, Felony of Second Degree

Typology: Exams

2012/2013

Uploaded on 02/13/2013

ayushmati
ayushmati 🇮🇳

4.4

(125)

163 documents

1 / 6

Toggle sidebar

Related documents


Partial preview of the text

Download Criminal Homicide - Criminal Law - Past Paper and more Exams Criminal Law in PDF only on Docsity! file:///J|/Backups/WEB%20ARCHIVE/OLDSITE/Full%20Jan%2030%202008/exams/Content/fclf90.htm[1/22/2009 4:11:54 PM] CRIMINAL LAW FORTUNE FALL Instructions The examination is three hours long, with the weight of each question indicated on the examination. Allot your time accordingly. There are no trick questions. Write on one side of the page. You may abbreviate (for example by writing D for defendant) if you so desire. The state of West York (where all questions are presumed to take place) has not yet adopted the general provisions of the Model Penal Code, though its courts are greatly influenced by the Penal Code. You should thus take into account relevant provisions of the Penal Code as well as common law principles. The homicide statutes of West York are as follows: Criminal Homicide (l) A person is guilty of criminal homicide if he purposely, knowingly, recklessly of negligently causes the death of another human being. (2) Criminal Homicide is murder, manslaughter or negligent homicide. Murder (l) Except as provided in the definition of manslaughter, criminal homicide constitutes murder when: a) it is committed purposely or knowingly; b) it is committed recklessly under circumstances manifesting extreme file:///J|/Backups/WEB%20ARCHIVE/OLDSITE/Full%20Jan%2030%202008/exams/Content/fclf90.htm[1/22/2009 4:11:54 PM] indifference to human life. (2) Murder is a felony of the first degree. Manslaughter (l) Criminal homicide constitutes manslaughter when: a) it is committed recklessly; b) a homicide which would otherwise be murder is committed under the influence of extreme mental or emotional disturbance for which there is reasonable explanation or excuse. The reasonableness of the such explanation or excuse shall be determined from the viewpoint of a person in the actor's situation under the circumstances as he believes them to be. (2) Manslaughter is a felony of the second degree ,negligent Homicide (l) Criminal Homicide constitutes negligent manslaughter when it is committed negligently. (2) Negligent Homicide is a felony of the third degree. * * * * Question 1 (20 points) Assume the West York legislature passes a "fetal homicide" law, amending the definition of "human being" to include "fetuses." Defendant is charged with the murder of "Baby Doe," a nonviable 15 week fetus. On learning that his wife was pregnant by another man, defendant struck her with his fist in the face. As a result of the blow she fell down a flight of stairs, causing injury to the placenta and necessitating a therapeutic file:///J|/Backups/WEB%20ARCHIVE/OLDSITE/Full%20Jan%2030%202008/exams/Content/fclf90.htm[1/22/2009 4:11:54 PM] incarcerated because she did not press charges. She felt herself totally under Vern's control and unable to get out of the situation in which she found herself. Debra didn't work outside the home, had three small children, was without family or friends, and felt that she had no alternative but to stay with him. On the fatal night, Vern came home drunk, threw a plate of food at her, and stormed off to take a nap, saying he was going to "beat the tar out of her" after his nap. During the next hour Debra became increasingly agitated, in part from the half pint of vodka she consumed. Finally, seeing no way out of her situation and believing she would be severely beaten when Vern woke up, she shot Vern in the head with his shotgun. Debra has been indicted for purposeful murder. On these facts would she be entitled to a self-defense instruction? To a necessity (i.e. choice of evils) instruction? To an instruction on the lesser included offense of manslaughter? To what extent would expert testimony be received about Debra's mental state? A psychologist is prepared to testify that Debra has an 80 IQ, has low self-esteem, is a dependent personality, lacks social syndrome." poor judgment, and is an example of the "battered spouse Discuss the issues. Question 5 (10 points) Dugan is a certified alcoholic. On the fatal night he took "just one drink" at a friend's home, and claims to remember nothing thereafter until he woke up in the hospital after running over a pedestrian several hours after he took that first drink. Witnesses at the scene established that Dugan was driving very fast and that he ran up on the sidewalk striking and killing the pedestrian. His blood alcohol taken at the hospital was 0.22% , more than twice the point of legal intoxication. An empty pint vodka bottle was found in the car. Dugan has been indicted for reckless murder. Discuss the issues, particularly the "voluntary act" requirement and the effect of voluntary intoxication. Question 6 (20 points) file:///J|/Backups/WEB%20ARCHIVE/OLDSITE/Full%20Jan%2030%202008/exams/Content/fclf90.htm[1/22/2009 4:11:54 PM] Doug and Vern were neighbors, and Doug built an eight foot high spite fence on his side of the property line between them. He awoke one morning to the sounds of splintering wood and looked out to see Vern pulling the fence down with a crowbar. Doug rushed out with a loaded shotgun, aimed it at Vern and said "stop or I'll stop you." Vern took two steps into Doug's yard with crowbar raised. Doug took a step forward and shot Vern in the chest from a distance of 10 feet, killing him instantly. Doug has been indicted for murder. Discuss the issues, including the defenses which Doug might raise.
Docsity logo



Copyright © 2024 Ladybird Srl - Via Leonardo da Vinci 16, 10126, Torino, Italy - VAT 10816460017 - All rights reserved