CRITICAL THINKING ASSESSMEMT, Exams of Nursing

Download CRITICAL THINKING ASSESSMEMT and more Exams Nursing in PDF only on Docsity! CRITICAL THINKING ASSESSMEMT FINAL EXAMS WITH QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS Assessment Technologies Institute, LLC Critical Thinking Assessment Why is the Critical Thinking Assessment important? A major paradigm shift has occurred in education over the past decade from an instruction-based approach to outcomes-based learning. Educators are increasingly aware of the value of teaching students how to analyze, reason, evaluate, and develop a creative and critical perspective on the information from which they are exposed. Educators are now viewing students as active learners, rather than passive recipients of information. Through the educational experience, students may acquire the critical thinking skills and habits for lifelong learning. The Critical Thinking Assessment complies with accreditation committee guidelines for documentation of outcome criteria upon entry and exit from the program. This assessment instrument offers faculty the opportunity to identify students’ level of critical thinking and facilitate higher-order thinking skills. Instructional materials are provided to faculty to help teach students how to apply critical thinking in their own learning environment. Students also receive material to enhance their abilities to take in information at a higherlevel. Our educational consultants offer critical thinking seminars customized to the individual institution’s needs. At ATI, we believe students must develop the skills necessary to think critically, exercise good judgment, and focus on adopting a commitment to lifelong learning. We strive provide the tools you need to make it easier for your students to learn. What is the Critical Thinking Assessment? The Critical Thinking Assessment is a generic, 40-item test developed in May 2000. The objective of the instrument is to determine students’ overall performance on specified critical thinking skills. The assessment is designed for use at the time of admission and repeated upon completion of the program. The goal for faculty is to use this diagnostic information to enhance instructional strategies and to improve students’ critical thinking skills. The Critical Thinking Assessment was designed and developed by a collaborative team of experts in the field of critical thinking. A few of the contributors include: Dr. Sandra Luz Martinez de Castillo, author of Strategies, Techniques, and Approaches to Thinking Dr. Sherry Diesler, author of To Become a Critical Thinker Dr. Carol Green-Nigro, author of Critical Thinking: A Case Study Approach Dr. Judith Wilkinson, author of Nursing Process and Critical Thinking Critical Thinking Assessment Sample Items nterpretation: to understand, comprehend, identify problems, clarify, decipher, or decode. For these questions, students must: • Comprehend the information. • Explain the meaning of the statement. 1. A company’s policy states that employees may take two weeks vacation after they have reached their seventh anniversary date with the company. This means that: a. employees must work for the company at least seven years before they may take two weeks vacation. b. employees who have worked for the company for at least seven years take two weeks vacation. c. if employees take two weeks vacation, they have worked for the company for seven years. d. all employees take two weeks vacation after working for the company seven years. Rationale: a. Correct. b. Incorrect. This statement is similar to statement number one. Some employees may not wish to take two weeks vacation even though they are eligible. c. Incorrect. Employees could have worked for the company for longer than seven years. d. Incorrect. Some employees may not wish to take two weeks vacation even though they are eligible. 2. Consider the statement: If it is made of glass, it may break. Which statement provides the best interpretation? a. If it does not break, it is not glass. b. Nothing breaks except glass. c. If it breaks, it is glass. d. Glass can break. I Rationale: a. Incorrect. Many things that do not break are not glass. b. Incorrect. Many things do break that are not glass. c. Incorrect. Many things break that are not glass. d. Correct. nalysis: to examine ideas; analyze arguments; make comparisons; project consequences; and categorize, organize, and prioritize variables. For these questions, students must: • Analyze the pattern, sequence, or relationship within the example. • Make comparisons. • Identify the best comparative relationship. 1. Consider the following to determine which is the same as roses are red: a. Tree trunks are brown. b. Carnations are white. c. Bananas are yellow. d. Leaves are green. Rationale: a. Incorrect. A tree is not a flower. The same relationship does not exist. b. Correct. c. Incorrect. A fruit is not a flower. The same relationship does not exist. d. Incorrect. A leaf is not a flower. The same relationship does not exist. 2. Consider the following. Which is the logical match? If B3E2H1, then: a. A9D8G7 b. C1E2G3 c. A4E3H2 d. B7F6C4 Rationale: a. Correct. The alphabetical pattern is every third letter, while the numbers in the pattern decrease by one (3, 2, 1 and 9, 8, 7). b. Incorrect. The letters and numbers do not follow the same pattern as those in the question. A c. Incorrect. The letters and numbers do not follow the same pattern as those in the question. d. Incorrect. The letters and numbers do not follow the same pattern as those in the question. valuation: to assess the credibility, significance, and relevance of information necessary to support the conclusions and to assess the information for biases, stereotypes, clichés, or inappropriateness. These questions require students to: • Assess the credibility of information sources. • Prioritize from best to least. • Select the best source of information from several options. • Identify possible biases. 1. You are given a prescription for a new drug to treat a long-standing health problem. How can you best determine the side effects that may be produced by this drug? a. Take the drug until side effects occur. b. Ask the physician who prescribed the drug. c. Consult another person who has taken the drug. d. Read research studies related to drug in question. Rationale: a. Incorrect. Side effects may or may not occur, so this is an unreliable source of information. b. Incorrect. This is the second best choice; however, the physician may not be aware of all the possible side effects produced by a drug. c. Incorrect. Another person is an unreliable source of information about prescribed drugs. d. Correct. 2. A politician states “Scientists argue that global warming is occurring. They cite evidence regarding an upward trend in nighttime temperatures throughout the United States. However, I know that winters in the Midwest have been colder than normal over the past two years. Therefore, I say, global warming is not occurring.” The best evaluation of the politician’s conclusion is that it: a. proves there is a relationship between Midwest winters and global warming. b. considers the importance of two successive cold winters in the Midwest. c. does not consider the relationship between global warming and Midwest winters. d. does not consider scientific evidence about nighttime warming trends. Rationale: E These traits and dispositions are key to achieving the desired outcomes and finding ways to improve nursing care. To answer these questions, the student must: • Examine one’s views with sensitivity to the possible influence of personal biases or self-interest. 1. You are trying to make a decision about the best policy to implement regarding sick leave for your employees. In order to make the best decision, you should: a. implement the policy that most closely resembles that of a nearby company. b. consider the costs and benefits to both the company and employees. c. choose the policy that costs the company the least amount of money. d. find out which policy is favored by the majority of employees. Rationale: a. Incorrect. This does not show impartial judgment or rational thinking. b. Correct. c. Incorrect. This does not show impartial judgment or rational thinking. d. Incorrect. This does not show impartial judgment or rational thinking for both the company and its employees. 2. Two students have applied for selection for residency in a college dormitory, but there is only space for one student. In order for the dormitory admission counselor to make the best decision about who to accept, the counselor should: a. choose the student with an ethnic background similar to those already living in the dormitory. b. allow students currently residing in the dormitory to select the student they want. c. use past personal experiences with similar students to guide the decision. d. consider each applicant using the same set of selection criteria. Rationale: a. Incorrect. Considering ethnic background may result in a discriminatory or biased decision. b. Incorrect. Allowing students make the decision does not guarantee an unbiased decision will be made. c. Incorrect. Basing a decision on past personal experiences is likely to result in a biased decision. d. Correct. Pow ered by TC PDF (ww w.tcpdf.org)