Criticism of Cognitive Psychology, Study notes of Cognitive Psychology

Download Criticism of Cognitive Psychology and more Study notes Cognitive Psychology in PDF only on Docsity! CRITICISM OF COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY (Lecture Series-6), B.A. IInd (Honors) (Paper-IVth Systems in Psychology) By Dr. Masaud Ansari Department of Psychology, A.P.S.M. College, Barauni L. N. M. University, Darbhanga 1 0 t h S E P T E M B E R 2 0 2 0 Criticism of Cognitive Psychology The cognitive approach to psychology studies internal information processes such as perception, attention, language and memory. Cognitive psychologists study these internal processes and how they affect our emotions and behaviour. Whilst cognitive psychology has been very useful in developing new theories and finding out more about how the mind works. The main criticism of cognitive psychology is that it is not directly observable. Another criticism, like other psychological approaches, is that this approach ignores other reasons for behavior other than cognitive. For instance, a behavior could be due to cognitive and social reasons. There are some limitations to this approach. ▪ Inability to directly measure cognitive function Another big problem for cognitive psychologists is that it is difficult to measure internal processes such as attention and perception. Instead of measuring these process' directly, cognitive psychologists use tests that measure behaviours, or external features that they believe are related to the internal process'. In doing this, researchers have to infer that the internal process which they want to investigate is actually related to the recorded behaviour without having any evidence of this connection. This is another limitation of the cognitive approach that may lower the validity of research within the area. ▪ Narrow focus on mental processes Cognitive psychology has a narrow focus on mental processes. For example, the use of the computer analogy means that information processing researchers focus mostly on the logical aspects of cognitive processing and less on the emotional, creative and social aspects that also affect thinking. Cognitive psychology has often relied on comparisons with how computers work as a possible way the mind might work. Is this really how the brain works? The brain is infinitely more powerful and flexible than the most advanced computer. ▪ Mediation processes Burruhus Frederic Skinner (B.F. Skinner) critic izes the cognitive approach as he believes that only external stimulus-response behavior should be studied as this can be scientifically measured. Therefore, mediation processes (between stimulus and response) do not exist as they cannot be seen and measured. Skinner continues to find problems with cognitive research methods, namely introspection (as used by Wilhelm Wundt) due to its subjective and unscientific nature. Humanistic psychologist Carl Rogers believes that the use of laboratory experiments by cognit ive psychology have low ecological validity and create an artific ial environment due to the control over variables. Rogers emphasizes a more holistic approach to understanding behavior. The information processing paradigm of cognit ive psychology views that minds in terms of a computer when processing information. However, although there are similarities between the human mind and the operations of a computer (inputs and outputs, storage systems, the use of a central processor) the computer analogy has been crit icized by many. Such machine reductionism (simplic ity) ignores the influence of human emotion and motivation on the cognit ive system and how this may affect our ability to process information.