Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Defences to a Negligence Claim: Contributory Negligence and Consent, Schemes and Mind Maps of Consumer Law

NegligencePersonal Injury LawTort Law

Two common defences to a negligence claim: contributory negligence and consent. Contributory negligence allows damages to be reduced if the claimant partially caused their own injury. Consent (volenti non fit injuria) is a full defence where the claimant knowingly and willingly accepted the risk of harm. examples and cases illustrating these defences.

What you will learn

  • What are the three elements required for consent to be a valid defence in a negligence claim?
  • Can a person consent to a risk and still claim negligence if they are injured?
  • What is contributory negligence and how does it affect damages in a negligence claim?

Typology: Schemes and Mind Maps

2021/2022

Uploaded on 09/27/2022

scotcher
scotcher 🇬🇧

4.4

(12)

37 documents

1 / 8

Toggle sidebar

Related documents


Partial preview of the text

Download Defences to a Negligence Claim: Contributory Negligence and Consent and more Schemes and Mind Maps Consumer Law in PDF only on Docsity! Defences to a negligence claim 1. Contributory Negligence • Damages can be reduced if the claimant had partly caused or contributed to his own injury • Judge will decide how much percentage the damages will be reduced by. • Partial defence • • Sayers v Harlow • C was trapped in a toilet she tried to escape and was injured. D was liable but damages were reduced by 25% due to the way she tried to escape • Jayes v IMI • C lost a finger at work. D were liable but he was found to be 100% contributorily negligent as he had removed the guard • 2. Exercise of free choice by C • Smith v Baker • C complained that a crane was working above him as he worked. Some rocks fell on him. Consent failed as he had no choice but to continue to work . • 3. A voluntary acceptance of the risk • ICI ltd v Shatwell • C ignored employers instructions and handled a detonator and was injured. Consent was allowed as he had accepted the risk • When a person has a duty to act and is injured because of D’s negligence, Consent will not be available…relevant in rescue cases • Haynes v Harwood • C was injured trying to stop a horse that had not been tethered properly. Consent failed • Ogwo v Taylor • C a fireman suffered burns. D was liable
Docsity logo



Copyright © 2024 Ladybird Srl - Via Leonardo da Vinci 16, 10126, Torino, Italy - VAT 10816460017 - All rights reserved