Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Degenerate Perturbation Theory: Computing First-Order Corrections in Degenerate Subspaces, Study Guides, Projects, Research of Quantum Mechanics

The steps to compute first-order corrections to energies and eigenvectors when there is degeneracy in the unperturbed eigenvalue using degenerate perturbation theory. The process involves defining the restriction of the perturbation to the degenerate subspace, finding the eigenvectors and eigenvalues of this restricted perturbation, and calculating the first-order energy corrections as the eigenvalues of the restricted perturbation. The first-order correction to the eigenvectors is given by the same formula as before, but with the exclusion of vectors from the degenerate subspace in the summation.

Typology: Study Guides, Projects, Research

Pre 2010

Uploaded on 07/30/2009

koofers-user-4ml-2
koofers-user-4ml-2 🇺🇸

10 documents

1 / 3

Toggle sidebar

Related documents


Partial preview of the text

Download Degenerate Perturbation Theory: Computing First-Order Corrections in Degenerate Subspaces and more Study Guides, Projects, Research Quantum Mechanics in PDF only on Docsity! Physics 6210/Spring 2007/Lecture 32 Lecture 32 Relevant sections in text: §5.2 Degenerate Perturbation Theory (cont.) Degenerate perturbation theory leads to the following conclusions (see the text for details of the derivation). To compute the first-order corrections to the energies and eigen- vectors when there is degeneracy in the unperturbed eigenvalue one proceeds as follows. Step 1 Consider the restriction, Ṽ of the perturbation V to the d-dimensional degenerate subspace D. Ṽ is defined as follows. The action of V on a vector from D is some other vector in the Hilbert space. Take the component of this vector along D, i.e., project this vector back into D. This process defines a Hermitian linear mapping Ṽ from D to itself. In practice, the most convenient way to compute Ṽ is to pick a basis for D. Compute the matrix elements of V in this basis. One now has a d× d Hermitian matrix representing Ṽ . Step 2 Find the eigenvectors and eigenvalues of Ṽ . Again, it is most convenient to do this using the matrix representation of Ṽ . Step 3 The first-order energy corrections to E(0)n are the eigenvalues of Ṽ . The zeroth order limit of the true eigenvectors that correspond to the true eigenvalues are the eigenvectors of Ṽ that correspond to the first-order eigenvalue corrections. Step 4 The first-order correction to the eigenvectors are given by the same formula as before, but now one excludes vectors from D in the summation. The zeroth order eigenvectors are those identified in Step 3. These steps are, at first sight, rather complicated looking. It is not really that bad, though. An example will help clear things up. Example: Hyperfine structure The hyperfine structure results from the interaction of the nuclear and electronic spin. Specializing to a hydrogen atom we can model it as follows. We model the electron as a 1 Physics 6210/Spring 2007/Lecture 32 particle with spin 1/2, so it has both translational and spin degrees of freedom. We will model the nucleus (proton) as fixed in space, so we model it as a spin 1/2 system. The total system then is defined on the Hilbert space which is a direct product of the space of states of the electron and another spin 1/2 system. A basis for this space is given by the product states of the form |ψ;S(e)z,±;S(p)z,±〉 := |ψ〉 ⊗ |S(e)z,±〉 ⊗ |S(p)z±〉, where |ψ〉 runs over a basis for the Hilbert space of a spinless particle (e.g., the energy eigenfunctions for the hydrogen atom Hamiltonian), |S(e)z,±〉 is the usual basis for the spin 1/2 system – here used for the electron, and |S(p)z,±〉 is the usual basis for the spin 1/2 system – here used for the proton. The magnetic moments for the electron and proton are given by µe = − e me S(e), µp = ge 2mp S(p), where g is the proton “g-factor”, which is about 5.6. It is a nice exercise to check that a pure point magnetic dipole (which is how we are modeling the proton) is the source of the following magnetic field B(r) = 3n(n · µp)− µp r3 + 8π 3 µpδ(r), where n = r r . Here the first term represents the familiar dipole term in a multipole expansion of the magnetic field outside a localized current distribution. The second term is used to model the limit in which one assumes the spatial dimensions of the current distribution vanish while keeping the magnetic moment µp fixed. The energy of the electron in the presence of this field is given by U := −µe ·B. Let us treat this energy as a perturbation of the usual hydrogenic energy and study the effects of this perturbation on the ground state of hydrogen in our current model. The unperturbed ground state of hydrogen does not “know” about the magnetic field of the proton. Therefore its energy is the usual −13.6 eV . However, since we have taken account of the spin degrees of freedom of both the proton and the electron we now have a four-fold degeneracy corresponding to the different possible states of orientation of the spins, and superpositions thereof. The degenerate subspace of the ground state energy is spanned by the four orthonormal vectors |ψground;S(e)z,±, S(p)x,±〉, 2
Docsity logo



Copyright © 2024 Ladybird Srl - Via Leonardo da Vinci 16, 10126, Torino, Italy - VAT 10816460017 - All rights reserved