Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Effective power of language and narrative,, Study notes of Business Management and Analysis

TABLE OF CONTENTS (1) Narrative Introduction (2) Human nature (3) Literary theory (4) Types of narrators and their models number of pages 26 number of words 8036

Typology: Study notes

2022/2023

Available from 06/12/2023

krishna-prasad-6
krishna-prasad-6 🇮🇳

91 documents

1 / 26

Toggle sidebar

Related documents


Partial preview of the text

Download Effective power of language and narrative, and more Study notes Business Management and Analysis in PDF only on Docsity! Business Studies Notes 3 rd. Year Undergraduate / Graduate Level SUBJECT: Effective power of language and narrative, Authors: (Original Study Notes and Lecture Notes prepared by Mr. K.P. Saluja (M.B.A. from Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad), supported by Mr. K. K. Prasad (M.B.A from IGNOU Delhi) These notes are intended to be used by undergraduate students, completing Year 3 Business Degree Courses. These notes will help undergraduates and graduates complete case studies, coursework assignments and pass exams in Business Studies and Economics. TABLE OF CONTENTS (1) Narrative Introduction (2) Human nature (3) Literary theory (4) Types of narrators and their models Narrative- Introduction A story, story, or story is any record of a progression of related occasions or experiences, whether nonfictional (journal, memoir, news report, narrative, travelogue, and so forth) or fictitious (fantasy, tale, legend, spine chillers, novel, etc.). Accounts can be introduced through a grouping of composed or verbally expressed words, through still or moving pictures, or through any blend of these. The word gets from the Latin action word narrare (to tell), which is gotten from the modifier gnarus (knowing or skilled).Portrayal (i.e., the method involved with introducing a story) is an expository method of talk, extensively characterized (and resembling argumentation, depiction, and composition), is one of four logical methods of talk. All the more barely characterized, it is the fiction-composing mode in which a storyteller imparts straightforwardly to a crowd of people. The school of artistic analysis known as Russian formalism has applied strategies that are all the more frequently used to examine story fiction, to non-fictitious texts like political addresses. Oral narrating is the earliest strategy for sharing narratives. During the vast majority lives as youngsters, stories are utilized to direct them on legitimate way of behaving, social history, development of a collective character, and values, as particularly concentrated on in human sciences today among conventional native peoples. then again, actually a few creators encode their texts with unmistakable scholarly characteristics that recognize them from different types of talk. By and by, there is an unmistakable pattern to address scholarly story structures as distinguishable from different structures. This is initial found in Russian Formalism through Viktor Shklovsky's examination of the connection among piece and style, and in crafted by Vladimir Propp, who dissected the plots utilized in customary cultural stories and distinguished 31 particular practical components. This pattern (or these patterns) went on in crafted by the Prague School and of French researchers like Claude Lévi-Strauss and Roland Barthes. It prompts a primary investigation of story and an inexorably powerful collection of present day work that brings up significant hypothetical issues: What is text? What is its role (culture)? How is it manifested as art, cinema, theatre, or literature? Why is narrative divided into different genres, such as poetry, short stories, and novels? Literary theory In artistic hypothetical methodology, story is overall barely characterized as fiction-composing mode in which the storyteller is conveying straightforwardly to the peruser. Until the late nineteenth 100 years, scholarly analysis as a scholastic activity managed verse (counting epic sonnets like the Iliad and Heaven Lost, and wonderful show like Shakespeare). Most sonnets didn't have a storyteller unmistakable from the creator. However, books, loaning various voices to a few characters notwithstanding storytellers, made a chance of storyteller's perspectives varying fundamentally from the writer's perspectives. With the ascent of the original in the eighteenth hundred years, the idea of the storyteller (rather than "creator") made the subject of storyteller an unmistakable one for scholarly hypothesis. It has been suggested that viewpoint and interpretive information are the fundamental attributes, while centralization and design are parallel qualities of the narrator.[according to whom?] The job of scholarly hypothesis in story has been questioned; for certain translations like Todorov's story model that sees all accounts in a repeating way, and that every story is portrayed by a three section structure that permits the story to advance. The early phase being a foundation of harmony — a condition of non-struggle, trailed by an interruption to this state, brought about by an outer occasion, and ultimately a rebuilding or a re-visitation of balance — an end that takes the story back to a comparable space before the situation of the story developed. Different scrutinizes of scholarly hypothesis in story challenge the actual job of scholarliness in account, as well as the job of story in writing. Significance, accounts, and their related style, feelings, and values can work without the presence of writing, as well as the other way around. As per Didier Costa, the underlying model utilized by Todorov and others is unreasonably one-sided toward a Western understanding of story, and that a more extensive and extraordinary model should be made to appropriately examine account talk in literature. Outlining likewise assumes an essential part in story structure; an examination of the verifiable and social settings present during the improvement of a story is required to all the more precisely address the job of narratology in social orders that depended vigorously on oral narratives. Types of narrators and their models A writer's decision in the storyteller is essential for how a work of fiction is seen by the peruser. There is a differentiation between first-individual and third- individual story, which Gérard Genette alludes to as intradiegetic and extradiegetic account, separately. Intradiegetic storytellers are of two sorts: a homodiegetic storyteller partakes as a person in the story. Such a storyteller can't find out about different characters than what their activities uncover. A heterodiegetic storyteller, conversely, depicts the encounters of the characters that show up in the story where the person doesn't take part. Most narrators present their story from one of the accompanying points of view (called account modes): first-individual, or third-individual restricted or all- knowing. By and large, a first-individual storyteller welcomes more noteworthy spotlight on the sentiments, suppositions, and impression of a specific person in a story, and on how the person sees the world and the perspectives on different characters. Assuming that the essayist will likely get inside the universe of a person, then it is a decent decision, albeit a third-individual restricted storyteller is an elective that doesn't need the essayist to uncover all that a first-individual person would be aware. On the other hand, a third- individual all-knowing storyteller gives an all-encompassing perspective on the universe of the story, investigating many characters and into the more extensive foundation of a story. A third-individual all-knowing storyteller can be a creature or an article, or it very well may be a more conceptual example that doesn't allude to it. For stories in which the specific circumstance and the perspectives on many characters are significant, a third-individual storyteller is a superior decision. Be that as it may, a third-individual storyteller needn't bother with to be a ubiquitous aide, yet rather may simply be the hero alluding to himself as an outsider looking in (otherwise called third individual restricted storyteller). Multiple narrators A writer might decide to allow a few storytellers to recount the story according to various perspectives. Then it really depends on the peruser to conclude which storyteller appears to be generally solid for each piece of the story. It might allude to the style of the essayist wherein he/she communicates the passage composed. See for example crafted by Louise Erdrich. William Faulkner's as I Lay Passing on is a great representation of the utilization of numerous storytellers. Faulkner utilizes continuous flow to portray the story according to different points of view. In Native American people group, stories and narrating are much of the time told by various elderly folks locally. Along these lines, the tales are never static since they are formed by the connection among storyteller and crowd. likewise be called fix stories. In the bedlam story, the individual sees the disease as a long-lasting state that will unavoidably deteriorate, with no reclaiming ideals. This is average of illnesses like Alzheimer's infection: the patient deteriorates and more terrible, and there is no expectation of getting back to typical life. The third significant sort, the mission story, positions the sickness experience as a potential chance to change oneself into a superior individual through conquering difficulty and yet again realizing what is most significant throughout everyday life; the actual result of the disease is less significant than the otherworldly and mental change. This is commonplace of the victorious perspective on disease survivorship in the bosom malignant growth culture. Survivors might be supposed to express an insight story, in which they make sense of for others a new and better perspective on the significance of life. Personality traits, more specifically the Big Five personality traits, appear to be associated with the type of language or patterns of word use found in an individual's self-narrative. In other words, language use in self-narratives accurately reflects human personality. The linguistic correlates of each Big Five trait are as follows: • Extraversion - positively correlated with words referring to humans, social processes, and family; • Agreeableness - positively correlated with family, inclusiveness, and certainty; negatively correlated with anger and body (that is, few negative comments about health or body); • Conscientiousness - positively correlated with achievement and works; negatively related to body, death, anger, and exclusiveness; • Neuroticism - positively correlated with sadness, negative emotion, body, anger, home, and anxiety; negatively correlated with work; • Openness - positively correlated with perceptual processes, hearing, and exclusiveness Social-sciences approaches People frequently guarantee to comprehend occasions when they figure out how to form a lucid story or story making sense of how they accept the occasion was created. Stories in this way lie at the underpinnings of our mental techniques and furthermore give a logical structure to the sociologies, especially when it is challenging to collect an adequate number of cases to allow measurable examination. Story is much of the time utilized in the event that study research in the sociologies. Here it has been viewed that as the thick, relevant, and interpenetrating nature of social powers uncovered by definite stories is in many cases really fascinating and helpful for both social hypothesis and social arrangement than different types of social request. Research involving account techniques in the sociologies has been depicted as yet being in its early stages yet this point of view enjoys a few benefits like admittance to a current, rich jargon of scientific terms: plot, type, subtext, legendary, legend/courageous woman, story curve (e.g., starting center end, etc. Another advantage is it underscores that even obviously non-fictitious records (discourses, approaches, regulation) are still fictions, in the sense they are wrote and ordinarily have a target group as a main priority. Sociologists Jaber F. Gubrium and James A. Holstein have added to the development of a constructionist way to deal with story in human science. From their book The Self We Live By: Account Character in a Postmodern World (2000), to later texts, for example, Examining Account Reality (2009) and Assortments of Story Examination (2012), they have fostered a scientific structure for exploring stories and narrating that is fixated on the transaction of institutional talks (legitimate issues) from one perspective, and regular records (little stories) on the other. The objective is the humanistic comprehension of formal and lived texts of involvement, highlighting the creation, practices, and correspondence of records. Inquiry approach To stay away from "solidified stories", or "accounts that become setting free, versatile, and fit to be utilized anyplace and whenever for illustrative purposes" and are being utilized as calculated representations as characterized by etymologist George Lakoff, a methodology called account request was proposed, laying on the epistemological presumption that individuals get a handle on irregular or complex multi causal experience by the burden of story structures. Human penchant to improve on information through a preference for stories over complex informational collections can prompt the account error. It is simpler for the human brain to recall and pursue choices based on stories with importance, than to recollect strings of information. This is one justification for why accounts are so strong and why large numbers of the works of art in the humanities and sociologies are written in the story design. Yet, people can add importance to information and create stories, even where this is inappropriate. A few researchers recommend that the story paradox and different predispositions can be tried not to by apply standard deliberate checks for legitimacy (measurements) and unwavering quality (measurements) with regards to how information (accounts) are gathered, investigated, and introduced. All the more commonly, researchers working with account like to utilize other evaluative rules (like credibility or maybe interpretive legitimacy) since they don't see factual legitimacy as seriously material to subjective information: "the ideas of legitimacy and unwavering quality, as perceived according to the positivist point of view, are some way or another improper and lacking when applied to interpretive exploration". A few rules for evaluating the legitimacy of account research was proposed, including the objective perspective, the profound viewpoint, the social/moral viewpoint, and the clearness of the story. Mathematical-sociology approach In numerical humanism, the hypothesis of relative stories was concocted to depict and look at the designs (communicated as "and" in a coordinated chart view on what's called mental narratology — which expresses that a scholarly message can show itself into an envisioned, illustrative deception that the peruser will make for themselves, and can differ enormously from one peruser to another. All in all, the situations of a scholarly message (alluding to settings, outlines, plans, and so on) will be addressed diversely for every individual peruser in view of a variety of variables, including the pursuer's very own background that permit them to understand the scholarly message in an unmistakable way from any other person. Film story doesn't have the advantage of having a literary storyteller that guides its crowd toward a developmental story; nor does it can permit its crowd to outwardly show the items in its account in an exceptional style like writing does. All things being equal, film stories use visual and hear-able gadgets in replacement for a story subject; these gadgets incorporate cinematography, altering, sound plan (both diegetic and non-diegetic sound), as well as the course of action and choices on how and where the subjects are found onscreen — known as mise-en-scène. These realistic gadgets, among others, add to the remarkable mix of visual and hear-able narrating that comes full circle to what Jose Landa alludes to as a "visual story instance". And dissimilar to stories found in other execution expressions, for example, plays and musicals, film accounts are not bound to a particular spot and time, and are not restricted by scene changes in plays, which are limited by set plan and designated time. In mythology The nature or presence of a developmental story in a large number of the world's fantasies, folktales, and legends has been a subject of discussion for the majority present day researchers; however the most well-known agreement among scholastics is that all through most societies, conventional legends and fables stories are built and retold with a particular account reason that effectively offers a general public a justifiable clarification of normal peculiarities — periodically missing an obvious creator. These logical stories manifest themselves in different structures and serve different cultural capabilities, including life illustrations for people to gain from (for instance, the Old Greek story of Icarus declining to pay attention to his seniors and flying excessively near the sun), making sense of powers of nature or other normal peculiarities (for instance, the flood fantasy that traverses societies everywhere), and giving a comprehension of human instinct, as exemplified by the legend of Cupid and Mind. Taking into account how legends have generally been sent and gone down through oral retellings, there is no subjective or solid strategy to unequivocally follow precisely where and when a story began; and since fantasies are established in a distant past, and are seen as a genuine record of happenings inside the way of life it started from, the perspective present in numerous oral folklores is according to a cosmological viewpoint — one that is told from a voice that has no actual encapsulation, and is passed down and changed from one age to another. This cosmological perspective in fantasy gives generally fanciful stories belief, and since they are effectively imparted and changed through oral custom among different societies, they assist with setting the social personality of a development and add to the thought of an aggregate human cognizance that keeps on aiding shape one's comprehension own might interpret the world. Legend is much of the time utilized in an overall sense to portray a huge number of old stories sorts; however there is an importance in distinctive the different types of fables to appropriately figure out what stories comprise as fanciful, as anthropologist Sir James Frazer proposes. Frazer battles that there are three essential classes of folklore (presently more comprehensively thought about classifications of fables): Fantasies, legends, and folktales, and that by definition, every sort pulls its story from an alternate ontological source, and subsequently includes various ramifications inside a progress. Frazer states: "Assuming these definitions be acknowledged, we might say that fantasy has its source in reason, legend in memory, and classic story in creative mind; and that the three riper results of the human psyche which relate to these its rough manifestations are science, history, and sentiment." Janet Bacon developed Frazer's classification in her 1921 distribution — The Journey of The Argonauts. 1. Myth – According to Janet Bacon's 1921 publication, "Myth has an explanatory intention. It explains some natural phenomenon whose causes are not obvious, or some ritual practice whose origin has been forgotten." Bacon views myths as narratives that serve a practical societal function of providing a satisfactory explanation for many of humanity's greatest questions. Those questions address topics such as astronomical events, historical circumstances, environmental phenomena, and a range of human experiences including love, anger, greed, and isolation. 2. Legend – According to Bacon, "Legend, on the other hand, is true tradition founded on the fortunes of real people or on adventures at real places. Agamemnon, Lycurgus, Coriolanus, King Arthur, Saladin, are real people whose fame and the legends which spread it have become world-wide." Legends are mythical figures whose accomplishments and accolades live beyond their own mortality and transcend to the realm of myth by way of verbal communication through the ages. Like myth, they are rooted in the past, but unlike the sacred ephemeral space in which myths occur, legends are often individuals of human flesh that lived here on earth long ago, and are believed as fact. In American folklore, the tale of Davy Crockett or debatably Paul Bunyan can be considered legends—they were real people who lived in the world, but through the years of regional folktales have assumed a mythological quality. 3. Folktale – Bacon classifies folktale as such, "Folk-tale, however, calls for no belief, being wholly the product of the imagination. In far distant ages some inventive story-teller was pleased to pass an idle hour with stories told of many-a-feat." Bacon's definition assumes that folktales do not possess the same underlying factualness that myths and legends tend to have. While folktales still hold a considerable cultural value, they are simply not regarded as true within a civilization. Bacon says, like myths, folktales are imagined and created by someone at some point, but differ in that folktales' primary purpose and bravery and were most often represented in both the human world and the mythological world by valiant warriors. While the gods of the second function were still revered in society, they did not possess the same infinite knowledge found in the first category. A Norse god that would fall under the second function would be Thor—god of thunder. Thor possessed great strength, and was often first into battle, as ordered by his father Odin. This second function reflects Indo-European cultures' high regard for the warrior class, and explains the belief in an afterlife that rewards a valiant death on the battlefield; for the Norse mythology, this is represented by Valhalla. In conclusion, Dumèzil's third capability is made out of divine beings that mirror the nature and upsides of the most well-known individuals in Indo-European life. These divine beings frequently managed the domains of recuperating, thriving, fruitfulness, riches, extravagance, and youth — any sort of capability that was effectively connected with by the normal labourer rancher in a general public. Similarly as a rancher would live and support themselves off their property, the lords of the third capability were liable for the success of their harvests, and were likewise responsible for different types of daily existence that could never be seen by the situation with rulers and champions, like naughtiness and indiscrimination. A model found in Norse folklore should have been visible through the god Freyr — a divine being who was firmly associated with demonstrations of depravity and indulging. Dumèzil saw his hypothesis of tri functionalism as unmistakable from other fanciful speculations due to the manner in which the stories of Indo-European folklore pervaded into each part of life inside these social orders, to the point that the cultural perspective on death moved away from a base discernment that advises one to fear demise, and on second thought demise became seen as the penultimate demonstration of chivalry — by hardening an individual's situation in the corridor of the divine beings when they pass from this domain to the following. Furthermore, Dumèzil suggested that his hypothesis remained at the underpinning of the cutting edge comprehension of the Christian Trinity, referring to that the three critical gods of Odin, Thor, and Freyr were much of the time portrayed together in a triplet — seen by a larger number of people as a general portrayal of what might be referred to now as "divine nature". In cultural storytelling An account can assume the state of a story, which gives audience members an engaging and cooperative road for gaining information. Many societies use narrating as a method for recording narratives, legends, and values. These accounts should be visible as living elements of story among social networks, as they convey the common experience and history of the way of life inside them. Stories are much of the time involved inside native societies to share information to the more youthful age. Because of native accounts leaving space for unassuming understanding, local stories frequently draw in kids in the narrating system so they can make their own importance and clarifications inside the story. This advances comprehensive reasoning among local kids, which pursues consolidating an individual and world character. Such a personality maintains local epistemology and provides youngsters with a feeling of having a place as their social character creates through the sharing and passing on of stories. For instance, various native stories are utilized to show a worth or example. In the Western Apache clan, stories can be utilized to caution of the hardship that happens to individuals when they don't follow adequate way of behaving. One story addresses the offense of a mother's interfering in her wedded child's life. In the story, the Western Apache clan is enduring an onslaught from an adjoining clan, the Pimas. The Apache mother hears a shout. Thinking it is her child's significant other shouting, she attempts to mediate by hollering at him. This cautions the Pima clan to her area, and she is speedily killed because of mediating in her child's life. Native American societies use narrating to show kids the qualities and examples of life. In spite of the fact that narrating gives diversion, its main role is to teach. Alaskan Native Locals express that stories show kids where they fit in, what their general public expects of them, how to establish a tranquil residing climate, and to be capable, commendable individuals from their networks. In the Mexican culture, numerous grown-up figures recount their youngsters’ stories to show kids values like distinction, dutifulness, genuineness, trust, and empathy. For instance, one of the renditions of La Llorona is utilized to train youngsters to pursue safe choices around evening time and to keep up with the ethics of the local area. Stories are viewed as by the Canadian Métis people group, to assist kids with understanding that their general surroundings is interconnected to their lives and networks. For instance, the Métis people group share the "Silly Pony Story" to youngsters, which depicts that ponies stagger over the course of life very much like people do. Navajo stories likewise utilize dead creatures as similitudes by showing that all things have purpose. Lastly, older folks from Alaskan Local people group guarantee that the utilization of creatures as representations permit kids to shape their own viewpoints while simultaneously self-considering their own lives. Native American seniors likewise express that narrating welcomes the audience members, particularly kids, to reach their own determinations and viewpoints while self-reflecting upon their lives. Furthermore, they demand that accounts help youngsters handle and get a great many viewpoints that assist them with interpreting their lives with regards to the story. Native American people group individuals accentuate to kids that the strategy for acquiring information can be found in stories went down through every age. Besides, people group individuals likewise let the youngsters decipher and fabricate an alternate point of view of every story. In the military field An arising field of data warfare is the "clash of the accounts". The clash of the stories is an out and out fight in the mental component of the data climate, similarly as conventional fighting is battled in the actual spaces (air, land, ocean, space, and the internet). One of the fundamental battles in fighting in the actual spaces is to shape the climate with the end goal that the challenge of • Metanarrative, sometimes also known as master- or grand narrative is a higher-level cultural narrative schema which orders and explains knowledge and experience you've had in life. Similar to metanarrative are master plots or "recurrent skeletal stories, belonging to cultures and individuals that play a powerful role in questions of identity, values, and the understanding of life References Hodge, et al. 2002. Utilizing Traditional Storytelling to Promote Wellness in American Indian events within any given narrative Czarniawska, Barbara (2004). Narratives in Social Science Research - SAGE Research Methods. methods.sagepub.com. Baldick (2004) S. R. Rao (1985). Lothal. Archaeological Survey of India. p. 46. Amalananda Ghosh; E.J. Brill, (1990). An Encyclopaedia of Indian Archaeology: Subjects. Owen Flanagan Consciousness Reconsidered 198 "Humanities tell our stories of what it means to be human". ASU Now: Access, Excellence, Impact. 2012-09-06. Archived from the original on 2019- 03-22. Retrieved 2019-10-18. Vladimir Propp, Morphology of the Folk Tale, p 25, ISBN 0-292-78376-0 Todorov, Tzvetan; Weinstein, Arnold (1969). "Structural Analysis of Narrative". Novel: A Forum on Fiction. 3 (1): 70–76. Coste, Didier (2017-06-28). "Narrative Theory and Aesthetics in Literature". Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Literature. 1. Piquemal, 2003. From Native North American Oral Traditions to Western Literacy: Storytelling in Education. Haring, Lee (2004-08-27). "Framing in Oral Narrative". Marvels & Tales. 18 (2): 229–245. "Narrative Psychology: General Overview". Web.lemoyne.edu. Retrieved 2023-01-25. Dennett, Daniel C. (1992), Kessel, F.; Cole, P.; Johnson, D. (eds.), "The Self as a Center of Narrative Gravity", self and Consciousness: Multiple Perspectives, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum retrieved 2023-01-25 Dan McAdams (2004). "Redemptive Self: Narrative Identity in America Today". The Self and Memory. 1 (3): 95–116. Gold E (August 2007). "From narrative wreckage to islands of clarity: Stories of recovery from psychosis". Can FAM Physician. 53 (8): 1271–5. Hyden, L.-C. & Brockmeier, J. (2009). Health, Illness and Culture: Broken Narratives. New York: Routledge. Gayle A. Sulik (2010). Pink Ribbon Blues: How Breast Cancer Culture Undermines Women's Health. USA: Oxford University Press. pp. 321–326. Burns, Holly (2022-11-22). "What if You Can't Find the Silver Lining in Your Illness?". The New York Times. Hirsh, J. B., & Peterson, J. B. (2009). Personality and language use in self- narratives. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 524-527. Bascom, William (January 1965). "The Forms of Folklore: Prose Narratives". The Journal of American Folklore. 78 (307): 3–20. Lindahl, Carl; Dumezil, Georges; Haugen, Einar (April 1980). "Gods of the Ancient Northmen". The Journal of American Folklore. 93 (368): 224. Gottfried, Paul (1993-12-21). "Alain de Benoist's Anti-Americanism". Telos. 1993 (98–99): 127–133. Hiltebeitel, Alf (April 1990). "Mitra-Varuna: An Essay on Two Indo-European Representations of Sovereignty. Georges Dumézil, Derek Coltman". The Journal of Religion. 70 (2): 295–296. "Native storytellers connect the past and the future: Native Daughters". Piquemal, N. 2003. From Native North American Oral Traditions to Western Literacy: Storytelling in Education. Basso, 1984. "Stalking with Stories". Names, Places, and Moral Narratives among the Western Apache. Hodge, F., Pasqua, A., Marquez, C., & Geishirt-Cantrell, B. (2002). Utilizing Traditional Storytelling to Promote Wellness in American Indian Communities. Journal of Transcultural Nursing, 6-11. MacDonald, M., McDowell, J., Dégh, L., & Toelken, B. (1999). Traditional storytelling today: An international sourcebook. Chicago: Fitzroy Dearborn
Docsity logo



Copyright © 2024 Ladybird Srl - Via Leonardo da Vinci 16, 10126, Torino, Italy - VAT 10816460017 - All rights reserved