Embodied Cognition From the Perspective of Vygotsky's Socio ..., Assignments of Philosophy

Download Embodied Cognition From the Perspective of Vygotsky's Socio ... and more Assignments Philosophy in PDF only on Docsity! Philosophy Study, August 2018, Vol. 8, No. 8, 362-367 doi: 10.17265/2159-5313/2018.08.003 Embodied Cognition From the Perspective of Vygotsky’s Socio-cultural Theory Xuejiao Zhang Liaoning University Huili Wang, Dan Guo Dalian University of Technology Embodied cognition is an approach to cognition that departs from traditional Descartes’ mind-body dualism for its emphasis on bodily interactions with the environment. The paper firstly describes three distinctive features of embodied cognition. Furthermore, from the perspective of philosophical methodology, the paper outlines Vygotsky’s socio-cultural theory and his contributions to the development of cognitive science. Three basic themes of Vygotsky’s writings are specifically described: genetic forces as a foundation of the study of mind, social origin of higher mental functioning, and mediation of sign systems in inter-mental and intra-mental functioning. Against the background of Vygotsky’s sociocultural theory, we further discuss the interface between embodied cognition and Vygotsky’s socio-cultural theory. It is claimed that bodily states and body-environment interactions are closely connected to sense-making. Embodied cognition should emphasize on the unity of body, mind, and cultural environment. Finally, the paper concludes with the influence of sociocultural theory on the study of embodied cognition. Keywords: embodied cognition, Vygotsky, socio-cultural theory 1. Introduction Throughout the centuries, countless philosophers and scientists kept debating on the relationship between mind and body. Descartes, the first to formulate the mind-body problem in the form in which it exists today, supported the idea of mind-body dualism. He reached this conclusion by arguing that the nature of the mind (that is, a thinking, non-extended thing) is completely different from that of the body (that is, an extended, non-thinking thing), and therefore it is possible for one to exist without the other (Wilson 2017). In the proceeding development, the notion of the disembodied cognition such as the computational and representational theories of mind flourished. Of particular note in this description of traditional cognitive science is the insular nature of thought (Shapiro 2007, 339). However, it is challenged by the embodied view on cognition. The embodied cognition framework highlights the importance of bodily process, such as action, for Xuejiao Zhang, Master’s graduate, School of Foreign Language, Liaoning University, China; main research field: Philosophy of Mind, Philosophy of Language and Cognitive Science. Huili Wang, Professor, Department of English, School of Foreign Language, Dalian University of Technology, China; main research field: Philosophy of Language and Cognitive Neurolinguistics. Dan Guo, Ph.D. candidate, Department of Philosophy, School of Humanities and Social Science, Dalian University of Technology, China; main research field: Philosophy of Mind and Phenomenology. DAVID PUBLISHING D EMBODIED COGNITION FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF VYGOTSKY’S SOCIO-CULTURAL 363 all cognition (Guan & Meng, 2013). The bodily process is rooted in society and culture. The central thought put forward by embodied cognition is in a manner analogous to Vygotsky’s socio-cultural theory. Vygotsky’s cognitive theory has far-reaching influence upon the western cognitive development. We would further illustrate the primary coverage of two ideas and share the contemplation concerning the interfaces between embodied cognition and socio-cultural theory. 2. Embodied Cognition Cognition is embodied when it is deeply dependent upon the features of the physical body of an agent, that is, when aspects of the agent’s body beyond the brain play a significant causal or physically constitutive role in cognitive processing (2011). Put it more specifically, there are three distinctive features for embodied cognition. First, the steps in a cognitive process, from the perspective of embodied cognition, might emerge from the physical attributes of the body (Shapiro 2007, 340). Proponents for embodied cognition argue that stimulation from bodily properties has a significant impact in perception and judgement. For example, one holding a cup of warm water seems to describe persons as having a warm personality. It is proved that hands’ feeling of physical temperature could affect the cognitive processing as well. Secondly, it tries to account for body’s contribution to the content of cognition, which needs to pay attention to Lakoff and Johnson’s engagement in the analysis on metaphors. Metaphor, as a figure of speech, makes an implicit comparison between two unrelated things but shares some common characteristics. For example, we describe that time is money or the eye is the window of the soul. According to Lakoff and Johnson, almost all of our concepts derive originally from the use of metaphorical reasoning: We learn something new only by understanding it in terms of something more familiar (Shapiro 2007, 341). Therefore, metaphor serves as the foundation of the basic form of abstract thinking. At the same time, some commonly used metaphors often closely tie abstract sense-making to concrete bodily experience (Leung 2011, 591). Among these concepts, human’s understanding of orientational metaphor especially stems from the facts with bodies. Consequently, metaphorical reasoning might depend crucially on the physical properties of body (Leung 2011, 593). A third assumption is that embodied cognition puts forward the integrated system of cognition, brain, body, and environment. The claim is this: The forces that drive cognitive activity do not reside solely inside the head of the individual, but instead are distributed across the individual and the situation as they interact (Wilson 2002, 630). 3. Socio-cultural Theory On the traditional view, cognition is cut off from the world in the sense that cognitive processes operate only on symbolic deliverances from the sense organs (Shapiro 2007, 339). Lev S. Vygotsky, one of the prominent philosophers and psychologists, develops the idea of socio-cultural theory. Socio-cultural theory emphasizes the contributions of social and cultural effects on cognitive development. Vygotsky argues for the uniqueness of the social milieu and regards sociocultural settings as the primary and determining factor in the development of higher forms of human mental activity such as voluntary attention, intentional memory, logical thought, planning, and problem solving (Turuk 2008, 245). It is concluded by Wertsch three seminal ideas form the basis of Vygotsky’s SCT: (1) an emphasis on developmental or genetic analysis as a means to understand certain aspects of mental functioning; (2) the claim that individual mental functioning has social origins; and (3) an emphasis on the mediated nature of human action (1991, 25). EMBODIED COGNITION FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF VYGOTSKY’S SOCIO-CULTURAL 366 social, viewing behavior and mind or social interaction and consciousness as aspects of a single system (Karim 2016). In contrast, embodied cognition puts less emphasis on the analysis of social interrelationship. Vygotsky’s declaration indicates that the process of internalization is a complicated one. The transformation of social behavior by means of mediational tools from inter-mental plane to intra-mental one requires the participation of two people or more. Therefore, the socio-cultural theory underscores the context in which practical activities occur. Finally, embodied cognition overlooks the functions of sign. In comparison, Vygotsky paid particular attention to mediation through sign systems. A fundamental assumption underpinning sociocultural theory is the fact that human mental activity is a mediated process in which symbolic and sociocultural constructed artifacts, the most significant of which being the language, play an essential role in the mental life (Vygotsky 1978, 40). In contrast, embodied cognition typically places less emphasis on the role of representations i.e. semantically endowed symbols, in thought and action (Shairo 2007, 341). 5. Conclusion Along with the overview of Vygotsky’s socio-cultural theory, we are aware of the inadequacy of the idea of embodied cognition. Based on the understanding of embodied cognition, we could go one step further and elaborate the superiority of Vygotsky’s sociocultural theory in genetic analysis, social origin, and mediational tools. In consequence, the study of Vygotsky’s socio-cultural thoughts can promote the social turning of cognitive science and embodied cognition. Works Cited Cole, M. Cultural Psychology: A Once and Future Discipline. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1996. “Embodied Cognition.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy 149.3 (2011): 91-130. Guan, Qun Connie, Meng, Wanjun, Yao, Ru, & Glenberg, Arthur M. “The Motor System Contributes to Comprehension of Abstract Language” [J]. Plos One 8.9 (2013): e75183. Jones, Peter E. “From ‘External Speech’ to ‘Inner Speech’ in Vygotsky: A Critical Appraisal and Fresh Perspectives.” Language & Communication 29.2 (2009): 166-81. Karim, Shabani. “Applications of Vygotsky’s Sociocultural Approach for Teachers’ Professional Development.” Cogent Education 3 (2016): 1252177. Kozulin, A. Vygotsky’s Psychology: A Biography of Ideas. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1990. Leung, Angela K.-Y., Qiu, Lin, Ong, Laysee, & Tam, Kim-Pong. “Embodied Cultural Cognition: Situating the Study of Embodied Cognition in Socio-cultural Contexts.” Social & Personality Psychology Compass 5.9 (2011): 591-608. Ozdemir, I. Elif Yetkin. “Self-regulated Learning From a Sociocultural Perspective.” Eğitim Ve Bilim 36.160 (2011): 298-308. Shapiro, Larry. “The Embodied Cognition Research Programme.” Philosophy Compass 2.2 (2007): 338-46. Turuk, Mamour Choul. “The Relevance and Implications of Vygotsky’s Sociocultural Theory in the Second Language Classroom.” Annual Review of Education Communication & Language Sciences 5.7 (2008): 473. Varela, Francisco J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1991. Vygotsky, L. S. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1978. ---. “Development of the Higher Mental Functions.” Psychological Research in the USSR. Moscow, USSR: Progress Publishers, 1966. 11-45. Wertsch, J. V. Voices of the Mind: A Sociocultural Approach to Mediated Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1991. EMBODIED COGNITION FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF VYGOTSKY’S SOCIO-CULTURAL 367 Wilson, Robert A., & Foglia, Lucia. “Embodied Cognition.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 2017. <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2017/entries/embodied-cognition/>. Wilson, Margaret. “Six Views of Embodied Cognition.” Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 9.4 (2002): 625-36. Yaroshevsky, M. Lev Vygotsky. Moscow: Progress Publisher, 1989.