Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Comparative Analysis of Tragedy: Aeschylus, Sophocles, and Euripides, Essays (high school) of English

Greek MythologyAncient Greek LiteratureClassical DramaTragedy

An analysis of the development of tragedy through the works of aeschylus, sophocles, and euripides. How modern critics have conflated aristophanes and aristotle's perspectives on tragedy, and explores the transformation of the genre through specific examples and theoretical texts covered in the class. The document offers insights into the qualifications of tragic works, the role of tragic characters, and the significance of choral performances.

What you will learn

  • What makes Sophocles' Oedipus the King an ideal tragic hero?
  • How did Euripides challenge the Aristotelian standards of tragedy?
  • How did Aeschylus contribute to the development of tragedy?

Typology: Essays (high school)

2019/2020

Uploaded on 11/21/2021

hong-raon
hong-raon 🇹🇷

2 documents

1 / 2

Toggle sidebar

Related documents


Partial preview of the text

Download Comparative Analysis of Tragedy: Aeschylus, Sophocles, and Euripides and more Essays (high school) English in PDF only on Docsity! Manisa Celal Bayar University Department of English Language and Literature ING 1110 Classical Literature 2020-2021 Spring Final Exam (Due: 21 June 2021 17:00) “Modern critics have often conflated Aristophanes and Aristotle to produce a caricatured account of tragedy’s development. According to this conventional schema, Aeschylus was primitive, Sophocles the mature artist, while Euripides brought the genre into decline” (Rutherford 54) Explain the quotation and discuss the development of tragedy and its transformation in the light of it. Refer to the theoretical texts and plays covered in the class and give specific examples (thematic and technical) that support your exploration. (100 pts.) For modern critics like Aristophanes and Aristotle, tragedy needs to have some qualification that determines the quality of the work. While these features are portrayed perfectly in some works, in other works these features are radically changed or didn't fulfill expectations for tragedy. Aeschylus was considered primitive because his work provides our first look at tragedy. Yet, his plays lack some qualifications. He named his work Agamemnon, and he is the tragic character in the play, however, his lines are few and he enters the play quite late. He didn't define characters enough, and his complex language makes it hard to understand. Another thing about a tragic character is to need to be someone who is between good and bad, so when that character makes a mistake, readers feel pity towards the, however we can't say such a thing for Agamemnon because of his mistake caused by his hubris. Even though considered primitive, Aeschylus reduces the significance of the chorus and highlights the role of dialogue and tragedy evolved and refined until it reached the mature form in Sophocles' hands. Sophocles portrayed his tragic features perfectly in Oedipus the King. Characterization and plot incredibly successful in the play. The plot is so powerful it can be read as a primitive detective story. It includes incest, patricide along mystery. Also, characters
Docsity logo



Copyright © 2024 Ladybird Srl - Via Leonardo da Vinci 16, 10126, Torino, Italy - VAT 10816460017 - All rights reserved