Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Exam 1 Questions with Solution - Analysis 1 | MATH 3001, Exams of Advanced Calculus

Material Type: Exam; Class: Analysis 1; Subject: Mathematics; University: University of Colorado - Boulder; Term: Spring 2012;

Typology: Exams

2011/2012

Uploaded on 08/26/2012

koofers-user-oh0
koofers-user-oh0 🇺🇸

10 documents

1 / 2

Toggle sidebar

Related documents


Partial preview of the text

Download Exam 1 Questions with Solution - Analysis 1 | MATH 3001 and more Exams Advanced Calculus in PDF only on Docsity! Math 3001 Exam 1 Solutions 1. (20 points) Prove that if lim n→∞ sn = 3, then lim n→∞ s2n = 9. Use only the definition of limit. Solution: We have |s2n − 9| = |(sn + 3)(sn − 3)| = |sn + 3||sn − 3|. Since limn→∞ sn = 3, there is an N1 such that n > N1 implies |sn − 3| < 1, i.e., that 2 < sn < 4. Hence for n > N1 we have |s2n − 9| < 7|sn − 3|. Now let ε > 0 be arbitrary. Choose N2 so that n > N2 implies |sn − 3| < ε/7. Set N = max{N1, N2}. Then n > N implies |s2n − 9| < 7|sn − 3| < ε. Since we can find such an N for any ε > 0, we have proved that limn→∞ s 2 n = 9. 2. (20 points) Let A and B be two subsets of R which are bounded above. (a) (5 points) How do you know that L = supA and M = supB exist in R? Solution: We know that supA and supB exist since these sets are bounded above and R is complete. (b) (10 points) Let C = {x + y |x ∈ A, y ∈ B}. Prove that supC exists and that supC ≤ L + M . Solution: It is sufficient to show that supA+supB is an upper bound for C. This is obvious, because if x+y ∈ C where x ∈ A and y ∈ B, then x+y ≤ supA+supB because supA and supB are upper bounds. (c) (10 points) Prove that supC ≥ L + M . Solution: Assume not: then supC < supA + supB. Let ε = supA + supB − supC > 0. Since supA is the supremum of A, we know supA − ε/2 is not an upper bound of A, so there is an x ∈ A such that x > supA − ε/2. Similarly there is a y ∈ B such that y > supB − ε/2. Thus x + y > supA + supB − ε = supC, a contradiction since x + y ∈ C. 3. Consider the field F of rational functions anx n + · · ·+ a0 bkxk + · · ·+ b0 , where n and k are nonneg- ative integers, and all the coefficients ai and bj are real numbers with bk 6= 0. Here x is not a number but just a placeholding parameter. Recall that this is an ordered field under the usual rules for addition and multiplication of functions, and with the order defined by anx n + · · ·+ a0 bkxk + · · ·+ b0 > 0⇐⇒ anbk > 0. 1
Docsity logo



Copyright © 2024 Ladybird Srl - Via Leonardo da Vinci 16, 10126, Torino, Italy - VAT 10816460017 - All rights reserved