Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Preparing for a Logic Course: Validity, Interpretations, and Testing Arguments - Prof. Joa, Study notes of Philosophy

Instructions for studying for an upcoming test in a logic course. It emphasizes the importance of understanding the concept of validity and being able to demonstrate the soundness and completeness of a system for evaluating inferences. The document also outlines specific topics to review, including inductive definitions, ordered pairs and sets, interpretations, and the properties of equivalence relations. Students are encouraged to review previous material and be prepared to answer questions about various logical concepts and techniques.

Typology: Study notes

2013/2014

Uploaded on 05/07/2014

mdegges
mdegges 🇺🇸

4

(2)

14 documents

1 / 2

Toggle sidebar

Related documents


Partial preview of the text

Download Preparing for a Logic Course: Validity, Interpretations, and Testing Arguments - Prof. Joa and more Study notes Philosophy in PDF only on Docsity! Studying for this test should be pretty straightforward. First, everything in this class is cumulative, so you should look back at the review sheet for the last test (and at the last test) and make sure you are on top of all that material. In particular, the first study sheet contains a list of terms whose definitions you should be prepared to supply. Make sure you can supply any of those definitions. As you study for the second test in this course, it’s important to keep in mind that the techniques we’ve been studying are in service of the central topic of this course: validity. [Validity is officially defined as a property of arguments, but we can also apply it to sentences. That is, we say that a sentence is valid just in case it’s logically true, or true in all interpretations.] Validity is a semantic notion and one of our aims is to develop a syntactic system for showing that valid arguments are valid. In particular, this is not a bad time to think again about the notions of soundness and completeness and why they are so interesting for our purposes. Here are some other questions that you (still!) need to be able to answer (some of the answers are given, indented, below the question): What is an inductive definition? What is an ordered pair and how can you determine whether ordered pairs are identical? What is a set and how can you determine whether sets are identical? What is an interpretation? [An interpretation is an ordered pair consisting of a non-empty set (a domain) and a function] How is an interpretation different from a dictionary? What does the function that is the second member of an interpretation take as arguments? And what kind of values does the function give for each argument? What kind of thing is a c-variant of an interpretation? [An interpretation. Note: given an interpretation, be prepared to give a c- variant (or, a-variant or b-variant, etc.) if asked.] What are soundness and completeness? [Remember: These are properties of systems for evaluating inferences. A system is sound iff whenever the system tells us that an inference is valid, it is valid A system is complete iff whenever an inference is valid, the system tells us it is valid.] You can expect to have to answer questions about these notions. The questions may resemble homework questions or they may not. What about the material since the first test? Here is a list of some of the things we have been doing and that you should make sure you can do on the test. 1) More complicated trees. In particular, trees in which there are sentences with nested quantification.
Docsity logo



Copyright © 2024 Ladybird Srl - Via Leonardo da Vinci 16, 10126, Torino, Italy - VAT 10816460017 - All rights reserved