Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Professor Field's Remedies Final Examination Fall 2005, Exams of Law

This is a three-hour, open-book exam for professor field's remedies course in fall 2005. The exam consists of three parts, with questions covering various aspects of remedies such as damages, injunctions, contempt, and 42 u.s.c. § 1983. Part iii presents a case study involving a mechanic named charley who is seeking financial recovery from apex, inc.

Typology: Exams

2012/2013

Uploaded on 02/19/2013

sangam
sangam 🇮🇳

4.1

(13)

96 documents

1 / 2

Toggle sidebar

Related documents


Partial preview of the text

Download Professor Field's Remedies Final Examination Fall 2005 and more Exams Law in PDF only on Docsity! Professor Field Remedies Final Examination Fall 2005 Instructions This is a three-hour, open-book exam ; you may consult any written materials . You may not discuss the exam with others . The exam is in three parts . Answer only 5 of 8 questions in Parts I and II. Do not waste time by answering more ; I will grade only the first five . Write your carefully labeled and we//-organized answers on only one side of blue-book pages (preferably in the order presented) . Unless your handwriting is unusually large, I expect no more than one page for each Part I answer, two for each Part II answer, and three for the answer to Part III . I . 25 Points Answer any FIVE questions (5 points each) 1 . Explain how expectancy and compensatory damages are fundamentally the same . Contrast the circumstances in which they are potentially available . 2 . In what major way are unclean hands and in par' delicto similar? When will (which?) one of them be unlikely to bar relief permanently? 3 . As discussed in class, the notion that government cannot be estopped is, at best, misleading . In some circumstances, it is wrong . When is it misleading ; when, wrong? 4 . What is remittitur ; additur? In what important way(s) do they differ? 5 . What is the principle advantage of an injunction over replevin in circumstances where the latter is available? 6 . What are rescission and reformation? When are they, respectively, appropriate? 7 . When are permanent injunctions denied for undue hardship ; when not? 8 . When are declaratory judgment actions unavailable for testing the constitutionality of criminal statutes; why? 11. 50 Points Answer any FIVE questions (10 points each) I . Under what circumstances might both damages and profits be available? Discuss differences between them in terms of needed proof and the parties' respective burdens . 2 . Discuss the main differences between (a) temporary restraining orders, (b) preliminary injunctions and (c) permanent injunctions . Give examples of when a court would, and would not, need to exercise continuing jurisdiction following a permanent injunction . 3 . What are the three types of contempt? What are their functions; who prosecutes each? Which is subject to a collateral bar? 4 . What relief is available against states under 42 U.S.C . § 1983? How does the treatment of states and their officers differ ; what compels it? How does 42 U .S.C . § 1988 differ? 5 . How do awards of damages and specific performance serve the same end? Discuss two situations in which specific performance is likely to be granted ; compare two when it is not . 6 . How are one-way fee shifting and punitive damages similar? In what extent is each limited by the ratio of respective recoveries to the amount of compensatory damages awarded? 7 . What justifies the American fee-shifting rule (compared to what alternative)? When does one-way fee shifting raise serious ethical problems? Why is two-way fee shifting uncommon?
Docsity logo



Copyright © 2024 Ladybird Srl - Via Leonardo da Vinci 16, 10126, Torino, Italy - VAT 10816460017 - All rights reserved