Federal and State Laws related to ELL programs, Essays (university) of Financial Accounting

Download Federal and State Laws related to ELL programs and more Essays (university) Financial Accounting in PDF only on Docsity! NMA1 NMA1 TASK 1 Western Governor’s University A1. Federal and State Laws related to ELL programs: 1. Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 protects people of all color, races, and national origin from being discriminated against, allowing them equal access to educational programs receiving federal monies. This influences ELL instruction as it ensures students will be given the resources needed to access content. 2. Equal Educational Opportunities Act of 1974 ensures an educational setting provides equal access for opportunities to students and faculty. This influences the instruction EL learners receive, and the law protects against discrimination of race, nationality, or color. 3. Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 protects against discrimination against students with disabilities. In a school setting it ensures qualified students with physical or mental disabilities have equal access to education. This influences approaches to EL instruction in that EL learners with physical or mental disabilities are properly evaluated and receive necessary accommodations for a successful education experience. 4. ESSA as modified to its current, ensures all students have access to high academic content and are equipped for college or a career path. This influences EL instruction as under ESSA protection, educational settings must work together with families to ensure the child is making progress. Under ESSA, low performing schools are accountable for change to increase progress and increase graduation rates. A2. Federal Court cases 1. Lau vs. Nichols is a case upheld in the Supreme court in 1974 in which an educational setting in California, under the Civil Rights Act 1964, had to make education accessible to all students including non-English speaking students. (Developing ell programs: Lau V. Nichols, 2020) 2. Castaneda v. Pickard was a court of appeals case that implemented a three-step approach process to allowing access to for EL learners. One is that the district had to adopt an approach that would be viable for EL learners, second is that it is equitably reached by all EL learners, and third that there is a system in place that monitors the progress students are making. (Castañeda v. Pickard: Are Ells receiving the services they need?, 2016) 3. Plyler v. Doe was a case in which a school district in Texas took a stance to exclude undocumented children. The case made it to the supreme court and the district’s rule was deemed unconstitutional under the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment. The ruling indicated that no matter the immigration status, districts must comply with allowing a child equal education access. This established a ruling that families do not have to provide legal immigration status and that educational settings are a safe zone students and families. (Clindstrom, 2021) A3. State Court Cases 1. Williams v. State of California case plaintiffs argued that students did not have access to safe educational settings, viable instructional material, or qualified educators. The case established that the state provide funding for adequate materials, qualified teachers and a plan for continuous future growth. It also ensured the responsibility for districts to maintain safe education and facilities for all students. (The Williams Case, n.d.) contacted with any and every consideration made to allow for further understanding and to plan accordingly. B2. The data a district needs to analyze should give specific information on language acquisition. For example, the years prior ELPA screener for returning students along with classroom teacher’s assessment of content learned over the year. All aspects of the returning student’s experience should be taken into consideration. How long have they had access to EL learning? This will help determine if the instruction was viable or if there are other programs that might be more beneficial. Other data to be analyzed is looking at the number of students, grade levels and what sort of grouping should be created. For example, an ELD teacher may create a newcomer’s group, a group that is emerging and another in which students are expanding and bridging. This data will help select the kind of program needed for each group. Additionally, a student may begin in a newcomers group but make enough progress as the year goes on to be able to then join an emerging group. C1. Three Major ELL programs 1. ELD push in is a system used to push into a classroom and work with students who have been identified as EL learners alongside their native English-speaking peers. ELD teacher works together with classroom teacher to provide pre teaching or reteaching content and support students with language acquisition and content acquisition. 2. Sheltered Immersion is designed to have both native English speakers and EL learners coexisting together in the classroom. The way it works is all students have access to the content curriculum however the EL learners receive a more diluted version. This design does not focus only on language acquisition but instead teaches all aspects of the topics in the curriculum to all students. 3. English Immersion is a structure in which students are pulled out of their regular educational setting to receive language acquisition support. This design focuses only on language learning and not on content. This approach is favorable for newcomers but not favorable long term as they are separated from peers for a period of time where authentic conversations with peers can happen. C2. Sheltered Immersion In Sheltered Immersion instruction EL learners and native English speakers learn content side by side. The way this is implemented is while native English speakers have full access to the curriculum, EL learners are given a condensed version but still participate in content instruction. Lessons are accessible to all students. Ideally classroom teacher has ELD instruction training and has support from an ELD teacher or educational assistant. Classroom is set up to be vocabulary rich and EL learners receive modifications through out for comprehension of content and language acquisition. C3. Regulations Affecting ELL Programs Regulations that affect ELL programs have been modified over the years. For example, educational entities receiving federal monies must follow regulations and provide equal opportunities to EL learners. Districts must have clear guidelines that educators follow to identify a student as ELL and provide the necessary resources for education. There are clear regulations on monitoring student’s progress, so students adequately acquire the language and exit the program. There should never be a case such as Y.S v. School District of Philadelphia in which a student is labeled and not given an opportunity to advance. Every child no matter what race, nationality, or language ability is to be given equal access to education and the resources they need to be a successful learner. Resources Castañeda v. Pickard: Are Ells receiving the services they need? YouTube. (2016, December 7). Retrieved October 20, 2022, from https://youtu.be/YBkBxPMphhg Clindstrom. (2021, January 6). Plyler vs. Doe: A landmark Supreme Court case. Colorín Colorado. Retrieved October 20, 2022, from https://www.colorincolorado.org/video/plyler- vs-doe-landmark-supreme-court-case Every student succeeds act (ESSA). Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) | U.S. Department of Education. (n.d.). Retrieved October 20, 2022, from https://www.ed.gov/essa?src=rn Glavin, C. (2016, October 19). Equal educational opportunities act of 1974. Equal Educational Opportunities Act of 1974 | K12 Academics. Retrieved October 20, 2022, from https://www.k12academics.com/Federal%20Education%20Legislation/equal- educational- opportunities-act-1974 Hopkinson, A. (2017, January 6). A new era for bilingual education: Explaining California's proposition 58. EdSource. Retrieved October 20, 2022, from https://edsource.org/2017/a- new-era-for-bilingual-education-explaining-californias- proposition-58/574852 Legal Information Institute. (n.d.). Utah admin. Code R277-716-1 - authority and purpose. Legal Information Institute. Retrieved October 20, 2022, from https://www.law.cornell.edu/regulations/utah/Utah-Admin-Code-R277-716-1 Office of Multilingual Curriculum & Programs. The School District of Philadelphia. (n.d.). Retrieved October 20, 2022, from https://www.philasd.org/multilingual/parents/glossary- of-acronyms/ US Department of Education (ED). (2020, January 10). Education and title VI. Home. Retrieved October 20, 2022, from https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/hq43e4.html US Department of Education (ED). (2020, January 16). Developing ell programs: Lau V. Nichols. Home. Retrieved October 20, 2022, from https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/ell/lau. html