Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

History of Competition Policy - Competition Law - Lecture Slides, Slides of Competition Law and Policy

History of Competition Policy, Anti Trust Law, Sherman Act, Formation of Trusts, Great Depression, Less Enforcement, Price Control, Chicago and Reagan, Competition Laws in the Eu, European Communities. The history of competition law refers to attempts by governments to regulate competitive markets for goods and services, leading up to the modern competition or antitrust laws around the world today. Some basic points of the lecture are given above.

Typology: Slides

2011/2012

Uploaded on 12/24/2012

beboo
beboo 🇮🇳

4.4

(14)

256 documents

1 / 12

Toggle sidebar

Related documents


Partial preview of the text

Download History of Competition Policy - Competition Law - Lecture Slides and more Slides Competition Law and Policy in PDF only on Docsity! Competition Policy: brief history Docsity.com Anti-trust law in the US • Origins of the Sherman Act: formation of trusts • Formation of a large single market due to transportation & communicationeconomies of scale and scope + innovationsexpansion in the size of firms • Separation between ownership-control • Liberalization of incorporation lawswaves of mergers • Fall in trasportation and communication resulted also in a rise competitionlow and unstable prices (low costs for scale/scope ec.) Docsity.com Sherman Act II • Sherman act cover price fixing, market sharing agreements and monopolization, not mergers • Firms wishing to coordinate price had the option of merging into a single firmsharp increse in the number of mergers • The Clayton Act of 1914 extended antitrust to cover mergers reducing competition • The Clayton act also forbids other practices like price discrimination • Creation of the Federal trade Commission – independent agency - that shares with the Department of Justice enforcement of antitrust laws Docsity.com History…Politics… • During the great depression less enforcement of antitrust laws: more price control, more regulation • Ex. Coal Mine industry reduction of demand, to avoid losses 137 producers formed a company to control prices and allocate output reasonable protection of the market against destruction • Competition laws and enforcement should be understood in the political-economic-historic context Docsity.com More activism • Until the mid-70s: more activism • International salt (1947) esatblished a rule prohibiting TIE-In SALES (a producer sells a product only if the consumer buy another one) • Courts ruled against “exclusive territorial clauses” (only one distributor can operate in each area) • Alcoa case (alluminium): the mere fact that Alcoa had 90% market shares and was building new capacity was enough to prove “monopolisation” Docsity.com Competition laws in the EU- The UK • After world War II competition was seen as a remedy to unemploymentCompetition law of 1998 brought the Uk in line with the EU • Until the 1998 the UK lacked a system of penalties and tools of enforcement (Uk authorities were not entitled to search firms’headquarters and seize documents) Docsity.com Competition law in the European Communities • Supra-national competition law in the EU orginates from the “Treaty of Paris” European Coal & Steel Community • Prohibition of trade barriers, discriminatory practices and other restrictions able to distort competition • Aims: 1.equal access to basic resources 2. free competition increasingly seen as the best way to assure efficient markets (due to the success of the US economy relying on antitrust law) • Competition rules under the Treaty of Paris wanted to avoid discrimination on national grounds Docsity.com Competition Policy in the EU • Today the main objectives of Competition policy enforced by the EC (under the Treaty of Rome) are probably economic efficiency and European market Integration • Social reasons are also consideredexemption to “Crisis cartels”agreeements where firms engage in reciprocal permanent reductions of overcapacity minimize the social cost of unemployment: the social cost may be too high since many firms might exit the industry producing job losses • Importance give to SME”de minimis rule” little harm can be done by firms of limited size compared to the size of the marketorigins from the crisis of the heavy industry in the 70’rely on SME for industrial growth Docsity.com
Docsity logo



Copyright Š 2024 Ladybird Srl - Via Leonardo da Vinci 16, 10126, Torino, Italy - VAT 10816460017 - All rights reserved