Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

US Ethnic and Racial Groups: Immigration, Discrimination, and Social History, Slides of Sociology

An in-depth analysis of the history of ethnic and racial groups in the us, focusing on immigration patterns, discrimination against certain groups, and social practices based on beliefs regarding family. The experiences of various groups including white protestants, irish, italians, jews, african-americans, native americans, hispanics, eastern and southern asians, and middle easterners. It also discusses the impact of the 1965 immigration law and the resistance to immigration in the us.

Typology: Slides

2011/2012

Uploaded on 12/29/2012

sankrant
sankrant 🇮🇳

4.7

(15)

94 documents

1 / 50

Toggle sidebar

Related documents


Partial preview of the text

Download US Ethnic and Racial Groups: Immigration, Discrimination, and Social History and more Slides Sociology in PDF only on Docsity! History of Ethnic and Racial Groups in the US Docsity.com IMMIGRATION THROUGHOUT 200+ YEARS OF U.S. HISTORY • Immigration Viewed as a “New Issue” – BUT: • It Occurred In Colonial Days – Mid 1600s: – Jewish Refugees from Brazil • Tauro Synagogue, Rhode Island in Colonial Time – Quakers – French Huguenots – Scots – Germans – Scots-Irish – Welsh – Catholics NOT Welcome – Banned from All Colonies at Various Points Docsity.com AMERICAN VIEWS OF MULTI- CULTURALISM • Who Is NOT Part of Multi-Culturalism? • ALL Groups Are Part of Multi-Culturalism • This INCLUDES White Protestants • WASPs Believe Theirs Is NOT a “Culture” – But “The Natural Order of Things” • This Pattern Existed From U.S. Colonial Times Docsity.com HISTORY OF WHITE PROTESTANTS • Dominant White Group As Part of the Mix – English Protestants • Competed With & Attacked Native Americans – German Protestants • Sought State of Texas; Fought for German Language – Scotch & Scotch-Irish – At Least Knew English – Scandinavians – Made Wisc & Minn Their Home Docsity.com MIGRATION IN THE 1800S • Immigration Reduced After Revolutionary War • 1830s: Migration Increased Again • 1840s: Migration Nearly Tripled – Potato Famine in Ireland – Overpopulation & Poor Economy in Europe – Irish & Germans Dominated – English, Scots, Welsh from British Isles – Scandinavians – Canadians (Both English & French Speaking) Docsity.com SPECIAL POSITION FOR PEOPLE OF COLOR • African-Americans: Special Targets – Only Group to Be Enslaved – Had Near Total Non-Free Immigration • Native Americans: – Land Taken Them, Forced Move to Reservations • Hispanics: Not Really Immigrants – Mexican Homes Invaded by Texas  U.S.A. Docsity.com THE GREAT IMMIGRATION: 1890-1920 • During This Period: – 18.2 Million Immigrants Entered U.S. – Watershed Separating “New” vs. Old Immigration – Included: • Southern & Eastern Europeans – Italians – Polish – Slavs • Jews – Pacific Islands – Caribbean Islands • Scandinavians – British – Irish – Canadians – Mexicans • Magyars – Greeks – Japanese • Some Tradesmen & Merchants • Many Farmers, Unskilled Laborers Docsity.com REACTING TO THE INFLUX • What Accompanied After the Huge Invasion? • FEAR on the Part of White Americans • Worried About Impact of So Many Immigrants • Immigrants So Different From Earlier Ones • Concerned About Impact on the Society • Ability of U.S. to Absorb/Assimilate Them All • Increased Opposition to Immigration Docsity.com CONSEQUENCE FOR LATER IMMIGRATION • 1930s: Only 500,000 Immigrants to U.S. – (vs. 18.2 Million from 1890-1920) • All of These Groups Brought Different Cultures, Languages, Customs • Many Immigrants Returned Home • 1940s: Post WW II Refugees – U.S. Reluctant to Accept War-Displaced Persons • U.S. Resisted Any Immigrant Accommodations Docsity.com MAJOR ETHNIC GROUPS: 1st 2/3 OF 20TH CENTURY Catholic: Irish, Italian, Polish Jews African-Americans Native-Americans Hispanics Docsity.com THE IRISH • 2nd Irish Immigrant Wave Different from 1st – Post 1840: Greater Number (800K vs. 300K) – Most Knew English – But Otherwise Useless! – Abysmally Poor – Perceived as Lazy, frivolous, drunken, & Catholic! • Great Resentment Toward England • Tenacious Retention of Catholic Religion • Irish Wouldn’t Give Up Religion to Assimilate • Urban – Not Isolated in Rural Areas • Viewed as a Different “RACE” (Not Like “Us”) • U.S. Restrictions Re Catholics Holding Office Docsity.com JEWS: 1ST MAJOR NON-CHRISTIAN GROUP • Jews in Colonial Times – Largely Merchants • German Immigrants – Largely Reformed • 20th Century Jewish Immigrants: – Very Poor, Unskilled – Mainly Orthodox – Hence Very Different – Little Inter-Marriage  No Assimilation • Great Resistance from Protestants – Ku Klux Klan – Not Considered “White” at 1st – Quota Limits in Ivy League Colleges Docsity.com PEOPLE OF COLOR African-Americans Hispanics Native Americans Asians Middle Easterners Docsity.com AFRICAN-AMERICANS: UNIQUE TARGET OF DISCRIMINATION • Only Group Almost Entirely Forced Migration – Came from Different African Villages, Languages – Placed in Separate Parts of U.S. – Small Groups Often Deliberately Separated – Unable to Adjust as Part of a Group • Forced to Live Under Slavery for 200 Years • From Beginning Prohibited from Citizenship • Blacks All Forced to Live as Isolates Docsity.com HISPANICS • Fastest Growing Segment of U.S. Population • Spanish Language (Except Brazil – Portuguese) • Wide Diversity of National Origins • Often View Selves as Separate Communities • Many Are NOT Immigrants – Lived on Southwest U.S. Lands Before Anglos – Texans Moved in & Revolted – Then Joined U.S. • Variety of Skin Colors  Racial Discrimination • Like Whites, Most Are Free Migrants • Population Size Major Discrimination Target Today Docsity.com 1960s IMMIGRATION CHANGES • 1965 Immigration Law: – Eliminated the Old “Quota Law” – Allowed More Immigrants from Asia, Middle East • 21K in 1965  93K 5 Years Later – 1st Limits on Mexican Immigrants  Increase in Undocumented Immigrants • Dramatic Change in U.S. Population: – Hispanic Population Increased by 33%; Asians, by 40% – Increased % of Non-Whites – Different Races (Asians, Blacks) & Religions (Muslims, Sikhs, Hindus) • “Original” White Population Was Appalled! Docsity.com EASTERN & SOUTHERN ASIANS • NOT a Unified Group! – Different Nations, Languages, Cultures, Religions – Buddhism, Confucianism, Taoist, Ancestor Worship • Chinese: 1st – Also Largest Group of Asians • Japanese Followed Chinese (Imprisoned in WW II) • Most Settled in Western States (Closest to Orient) • Asians Originally Banned from Citizenship • Filipinos 2nd Largest Group of Asians – Catholic • Others: Koreans, Vietnamese (War Brides) • Southern Asians (India, Pakistan) – More Recent Docsity.com CONSEQUENCES OF ETHNIC PERSISTENCE IN 21ST CENTURY AMERICA • Ethnic/Racial Population Increases: – Metropolitan Detroit Census Data – 2000 • Social & Cultural Patterns: – Language & Religion – Orientation to the World – Proper Demeanor – Family & Social Group Structures – Social Practices Docsity.com TRI COUNTY ETHNICITY 2000 • Total Population: 4,043,467 • Foreign Born: 325,994 ( 8.1%) • Foreign Language: 438,582 (10.8%) • Black: 1,002,038 (24.8%) • Asian: 101,386 ( 2.5%) • Total Non-White: 1,103,424 (27.3%) Docsity.com MAJOR NATIONALITY GROUPS • German: 641,304 (15.9%) • Polish: 440,914 (10.9%) • Irish: 410,930 (10.2%) • Italian: 265,214 ( 6.6%) • French: 163,500 ( 4.0%) • Hispanic: 118,641 ( 2.9%) • Arabic: 19,185 ( 0.5%) • Iraqi (+Chaldean): 10,104 ( 0.2%) Docsity.com PROPER DEMEANOR • Close Physical Contact In Conversation vs. Respectful Distance • Appropriateness Of Eye Contact • Preference for Direct vs. Indirect Conversation • Formal vs. Informal Agreements – Distrust Consent Forms (esp. Women) • Preference for Formal or Informal Means of Address, Visiting (Polish vs. Irish) • Reluctance to Accept Youth & Women in Formal Statuses Docsity.com SOCIAL DIFFERENCES TO BE CONSIDERED • Family Structure: – Family Statuses; Roles for Women; Roles for Children • Social Practices Based on Beliefs About the Family and Society: – Living Arrangements; Relations Between Generations; Child-Rearing Practices; Visiting Practices; Beliefs About Privacy; Acceptance of Professional “Helpers” • Note: This Training Was Especially Prepared for Professionals in Medical Settings Docsity.com FAMILY STRUCTURE • Family Statuses: – Who is Head of Family? – Who Can Instruct a Man? – Who Can Instruct an Older Person? – Nature of Husband – Wife Relations – Who Decides Whose Activities, Health Care? Docsity.com SOCIAL PRACTICES Based On Beliefs Re Family (ctd) • Child-Rearing Practices: – Who Is Child’s Caregiver: Mother? – Or Grandmother? • Visiting Practices: – Irish (& Arabs): Long, Casual Visits (& Loud!) – Polish: Short, Announced Visits (Patient “Receives”) – Blacks Need Privacy Docsity.com SOCIAL PRACTICES Based On Beliefs Re Family (ctd) • Acceptance of Professional “Helpers” – Many Groups Resist Professional Helpers – Especially with Psychological Services – Irish: Good at Deflecting Information Requests • Nature of Family Support: – Jewish: Social Support Is Critical – Not Acts – Polish: Acts Important – Not Feeling Docsity.com SUMMARY OF SOCIAL & CULTURAL DIFFERENCES • There Are Many Differences Between Racial & Ethnic Groups … EX: – Social Demeanor – Ways of Interacting – Social Status – Beliefs & Attitudes – Preferred Behavior – Degree of Social Restraint or Informality • These Differences Persist Several Generations! • Long After Individual Identifies as “Ethnic”! • Profound Impact on Inter-Group Relations Especially Intermarried Families! Docsity.com RESISTANCE TO IMMIGRATION • Post 1965 Law: Support Migration Restriction • 1994 General Social Survey: – 3/4 Want to Limit Migration – to “Unite” Country • Numerous Issues: – Border Control Issues, Undocumented Immigrants – Refuse Services to Undocumented Aliens (Health) – Distinguishing Between Legal & Illegal Immigrants • Immigrants Complain of Increased Discrimination Docsity.com ENGLISH LANGUAGE MOVEMENT • Establish English as Official U.S. Language • “English Only” Movement in Schools • Eliminate “English as 2nd Language” Classes – How Are They Going to Learn English? • Force Immigrants to Lose Their “Accents” • “No Child Left Behind”  Forces Schools to Eliminate All Programs Not Directed to Tests  Impacts English as 2nd Language Classes Docsity.com RESISTANCE TO AFFIRMATIVE ACTION • Policies Ensuring Minorities of Certain Rights – Education, Jobs, to Make Up for Past Inequities • Whites More Accepting of Diversity in General • Less Accepting of Programs to Achieve It • Affirmative Action “Under Siege” (Alba & Nee, 2005) – Bakke (U. Calif, 1978) – 1995 Calif. Eliminated Minority Admissions – Hapwood (U. Texas Law, 1996) – Mich. Law Changes; U. of Mich Cases (Grutter v. Bollinger, Gratz v. Hollinger) • Programs Seen as Threats to White Superiority Docsity.com
Docsity logo



Copyright © 2024 Ladybird Srl - Via Leonardo da Vinci 16, 10126, Torino, Italy - VAT 10816460017 - All rights reserved