Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Holly Farms Corp. v. NLRB: Chicken Catchers' Classification under Labor Act, Study Guides, Projects, Research of Law

The supreme court case of holly farms corp. V. Nlrb, decided in 1996, where the court upheld the national labor relations board's (nlrb) determination that live-haul workers in the poultry industry, including chicken catchers, were covered employees under the national labor relations act (nlra), rather than exempt agricultural laborers. The document also covers the arguments and facts of the case, as well as the court's rulings on the classification of forklift operators and truck drivers.

Typology: Study Guides, Projects, Research

2011/2012

Uploaded on 12/11/2012

amulya
amulya 🇮🇳

5

(3)

122 documents

1 / 2

Toggle sidebar

Related documents


Partial preview of the text

Download Holly Farms Corp. v. NLRB: Chicken Catchers' Classification under Labor Act and more Study Guides, Projects, Research Law in PDF only on Docsity! Holly Farms Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board 517 U.S. 392 (1996) Docket Number: 95-210 Abstract Argued: February 21, 1996 Decided: April 23, 1996 Subjects: Unions: Representative Election Facts of the Case Holly Farms Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Tyson Foods, Inc., is a vertically integrated poultry producer. In 1989, the Chauffeurs, Teamsters and Helpers, Local 391, filed a representation petition with the National Labor Relations Board, seeking an election in a proposed unit that included live-haul employees working out of Holly Farms' Wilkesboro processing plant. The unit included workers described as "live-haul" crews, or teams of chicken catchers, forklift operators, and truckdrivers, who collect for slaughter chickens raised as broilers by independent contract growers, and transport the birds to the processing plant. Classifying the live-haul workers as employees protected by the National Labor Relations Act, rather than agricultural laborers excluded from the Act's coverage, the Board approved the bargaining unit. On petition for review, the Court of Appeals enforced the Board's order, holding that the Board's classification rested on a reasonable interpretation of the Act and was consistent with the Board's prior decisions. Question Presented Did the National Labor Relations Board correctly classify chicken catchers as employees, and not as exempt agricultural workers, for purposes of the National Labor Relations Act? Conclusion Yes. In a 5-4 opinion delivered by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, the Court
Docsity logo



Copyright © 2024 Ladybird Srl - Via Leonardo da Vinci 16, 10126, Torino, Italy - VAT 10816460017 - All rights reserved