Download Comparing Survivorship of Americans in the 1800s and Modern Times and more Study notes Biology in PDF only on Docsity! Human Populations: Type I, II, III Survivorship Curves SC Academic Standards: 4.L.5A; 5.L4A; 6.L.4B; 7.EC.5A,B; H.B.6A,C. NGSS DCI: 5-‐ESS3.C; MS-‐LS2A,C,D; MS-‐ESS3.C; HS-‐LS2.A,C. Science and Engineering Practices: S.1A.1; S.1A.2; S.1A.3; S.1A.4; S.1A.5; S.1A.6; S.1A.7 Crosscutting Concepts: Patterns; Scale, Proportion, and Quantity; Stability and Change; and Systems Models. Focus Question(s): How is survivorship of modern Americans different from the survivorship of Americans living in the 1800’s? How can survivorship curves be used to predict population growth dynamics? Conceptual Understanding: Ecosystems have carrying capacities, which are limits to the numbers of organisms and populations they can support. Limiting factors include the availability of biotic and abiotic resources and challenges such as predation, competition, and disease. A complex set of interactions within an ecosystem can keep its numbers and types of organisms relatively stable over long periods of time. Fluctuations in conditions can challenge the functioning of ecosystems in terms of resource and habitat availability Each plant or animal has a unique pattern of growth and development called a life cycle. Some characteristics (traits) that organisms have are inherited and some result from interactions with the environment. In all ecosystems, organisms and populations of organisms depend on their environmental interactions with other living things (biotic factors) and with physical (abiotic) factors (such as light, temperature, water, or soil quality). Disruptions to any component of an ecosystem can lead to shifts in its diversity and abundance of populations. Background: Demography is the study of population dynamics -‐ how populations grow and decline. The worldwide human population is currently experiencing a population growth phase, and presently is increasing at an exponential rate (though it is slowing slightly, human growth rate is still positive). Today, the human population is just over 6 billion people, and is expected to double in about 35 years (300 years ago, the human population used to double every 600 years!) By the year 2050 we could have 10-‐12 billion people on earth! We are unsure of the carrying capacity of the earth; some scientists fear we have already surpassed it. Populations grow as more members are added (through births and immigration) and populations decline as members are deleted (through deaths and emigration). Stable populations have a balance between birth (and immigration) rates and death (and emigration) and are said to have a zero population growth rate (G=0, where G is the Growth Rate of a population). Predation and Competition also help to keep population sizes stable. Today we will look at survivorship / mortality curves, and construct a static life table. A survivorship curve traces the decline in number, over time, of a group of individuals born at the same time (a cohort). It can be thought of as the probability of an individual surviving to various ages, or the average Life Expectancy. Life expectancy is different from the Maximum Life Span (i.e. the American robin, Turdus migratorius, can live to be 7 years old but the probability of a newly hatched robin doing so is less than 1 %. Many live only a year or two. Life expectancy is 1-‐2 years, maximum life span is 7 years). The life expectancy of human populations has increased significantly in the past 100 -‐ 300 years due to improved nutrition, preventative medicine, life-‐style changes, improved sewage control and hygiene and new technologies such as refrigeration and pasteurization. In the early days of Rome, life expectancy was only 22 years! In America in 1900, the life expectancy was about 48 years; in 2010 it was 78.9 years. A Dominican woman lived to a ripe old age of 127 (the maximum human life span). Disease often limited population size prior to the late 1800s. Although reproductive rates were high, child mortality rates were also high, so the population remained relatively steady. With the development of medicine, vaccines, and improvements in sanitation, there was a decrease in infant and childhood mortality. This drop in mortality can be seen as an increase in survivorship. In brief, survival rates are up and mortality rates, especially infant mortality rates, are down: this leads to population growth. As human populations progress through time their population growth rates follow predictable patterns called the demographic transition (where birth rates are high but death rates are also high at early stages, but by the end of the progression both birth and death rates are low). First world nations have passed through the transition already; many third world countries are in the midst of the transition currently. The goal of many human rights organizations is to help developing countries pass through the transition and enter the 4th , post-‐industrial, stage, where growth rate is low and stable, leading to a stable (non-‐growing) population size – the sooner all populations are at ZPG (zero population growth) the better off our world will be as we approach the end of our finite resources. As the United States has progressed through the industrial revolution and the demographic transition model over the last 150 years, changes in the life-‐styles of citizens have been reflected in their age at death. Factors such as diseases and accidents have changed in their relative impacts. One way to study these changes in human demographic patterns is to visit a local cemetery and collect data recorded on tombstones-‐ from this you can create a survivorship curve. Previous Knowledge: (sociology): It’s is good to have a little sociological background on your area: There are great variations in life expectancy between different parts of the world, mostly caused by differences in public health, medical care, and diet. The impact of AIDS on life expectancy is particularly notable in many African countries. In the United States, particularly the southeast, in the 1700’s there were a couple scarlet fever epidemics (1735-‐40, 1786); during the civil war (1860-‐1865) typhoid epidemics and malaria claimed lives; there was a flu epidemic in 1857-‐59 and in 1918-‐19 (the Spanish Flu of 1917/18 infected 1/5 of world population, with 3% dying from flu). And, from Sundstrom, William, et al. "Industrialization and Fertility in the 19th Century: Evidence from South Carolina." http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CCI QFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fweb.utk.edu%2F~mwanamak%2FJEHarticle.pdf&ei= 0S8sVPDkE4eyyQTQzIG4AQ&usg=AFQjCNFM7BmNn6zy4b1tTO2SFk-‐YAQin-‐ Q&bvm=bv.76477589,d.aWw “By the dawn of the 20th century, fertility rates in the United States had undergone a century of steady decline. In 1800, white American females could expect to bear 7.0 children on average; by 1900, this number was 3.6. The factors behind the 19th century decline have been the subject of a lengthy literature highlighting the importance of intergenerational bequests, the economic value of children, and the cultural context for American family formation. There are a number of mechanisms by which industrialization may have altered a household's fertility outcome. First, several models of economic growth and fertility decline highlight the role of human capital in increasing the incentives of households to invest in child quality over quantity, thereby reducing the number of children born. Second, industrialization may have induced a rise in the implicit costs of raising children. In particular, industries with high rates of female employment increased the opportunity cost of female time. Under the assumption that the child production process is female time-‐ intensive, this would have reduced the incentive to bear children. Third, the movement away from agricultural and at-‐home production to centralized production, in addition to more restrictive child labor laws, may have reduced the economic return to children, again lowering parental demand and fertility rates. Fourth, industrialization was associated with increased urbanization and the crowding that occurred may have increased the explicit costs of raising children through higher housing and food costs without an associated increase in the benefit. Finally, the developing economy in the United States witnessed decreases in child mortality rates, especially after 1880.” http://io9.com/5920871/how-‐we-‐died-‐200-‐years-‐ago-‐compared-‐to-‐how-‐we-‐die-‐ today Question 1: Do people living in modern times (1900’s) have a longer life expectancy versus people living in the 1800’s? Hypothesis: Null Hypothesis: Question 2: In the 1800’s, who had a longer life expectancy, men or women? Hypothesis: Null Hypothesis: Procedure: (*Note: you may want to divide the class into 4 groups, one group finds 50 tombstones of males you died before 1900, one group looks for 50 tombstones of females … and so on). 1. Select 100 tombstones of people (50 males and 50 females) that died before 1900 (so, they lived in the 1800’s) and record their ages at death and the sex of the individual. 2. Next, choose 100 tombstones of people (50 males and 50 females) who died after 1980 (living the bulk of their life in the 1900’s, though some may have lived in the 2000’s as well – that’s ok) and record their ages at death and the sex of the individual. 3. Then, construct a static life table from these data using the attached data sheet. Determine values for the number of individuals who were alive at age 0-‐9 years (interval 1), 10 -‐ 19 years, 20 -‐ 29 years and so on. Also, determine the number of individuals who died during each interval (the opposite of a survivorship curve is a mortality curve). A survivorship curve is prepared by plotting the logarithm of the number of survivors against age. 4. Finally, Plot the % survivorship versus age intervals for the different populations. (Note: typically this is graphed as log 10 (%S) but the curve comes out about the same so you can choose to graph it normally, % S on Y and age interval on X, or use semi-‐log graph paper with %S on Y and age interval on X. Age Interval (years) Age at Death (years) (List the separate ages of death for each individual who died in this age interval. The total goes in the next column) # who died during interval Survivorship (# still alive) % Survivorship ( # still alive / total number of people in cohort) x100 0-‐1 2-‐9 10-‐19 20-‐29 30-‐39 40-‐49 50-‐59 60-‐69 70-‐79 80-‐89 90-‐99 100+ TOTAL 50 50 0 0 Table 3: MALES who died after 1980 (Lived in 1900s): What was the average age of death (average life expectancy)? ____________ Maximum life span ?________________ Age Interval (years) Age at Death (years) (List the separate ages of death for each individual who died in this age interval. The total goes in the next column). # who died during interval Survivorship (# still alive) % Survivorship ( # still alive / total number of people in cohort) x100 0-‐1 2-‐9 10-‐19 20-‐29 30-‐39 40-‐49 50-‐59 60-‐69 70-‐79 80-‐89 90-‐99 100+ TOTAL 50 50 0 0 Table 4. FEMALES who died after 1980 (Lived in 1900s): What was the average age of death (average life expectancy)? ____________ Maximum life span ?________________ Now, Plot the survivorship versus age intervals for both males and females who died before 1900 on ONE graph. Data Analysis: From the data table, graph %S (Y axis) versus Age Interval (X axis). All 4 data sets should go on the same graph. Here is a sample of what a completed data table should look like: Age Interval (years) Age at Death (years) (List the separate ages of death for each individual who died in this age interval) # who died during interval Survivorship (total # still alive) 50 total: % Survivorship (( # still alive / total number of people in cohort ) x100) 0-‐1 2 months 1 49 98% 2-‐9 3, 5 2 47 94 10-‐19 11 1 46 92 20-‐29 20 1 45 90 30-‐39 31, 32, 38 3 42 84 40-‐49 48, 48 2 40 80 50-‐59 50, 57 2 38 76 And so on – until you have 50 ages at death All ages added together = x x x Average life Expectancy = total of all ages / 50 names x x x Total 50 ages 50 0 0 Students may find it useful to begin with a data table like the one on the following page. With-‐out Care With Care Total # of bubbles = _____ Total # of bubbles = _____ Average Age at Death = ____ Average Age at Death = _____ Table 1. Bubble survival rate with and without care. Bubble number one lived _____ sec. Age at Death and Survivorship* Time (seconds) Without Care With Without Care* With* Time Zero X X total # bubbles = total = 0-‐4 5-‐9 10-‐14 15-‐19 20-‐24 25-‐29 30-‐34 35-‐39 40-‐44 45-‐49 50-‐54 55-‐59 60-‐64 > 65 Table 2: Age at Death and Survivorship* *subtract the number that died in the interval from the total # of bubbles to get how many are still alive (survivorship) Now make two graphs: one of Age at Death versus Time Interval (bar graph) and one of Survivorship versus Time Interval (Line Graph). Each Graph contains two data sets. Reflection Questions: • What type of survivorship curve (I, II, or III) did you find for your data? What does this reflect? (Type I) • Did your data show a difference in age at death between males and females? For which cohort? Why do you think this happened? • What was the average life expectancy for people living in the 1800’s? ________ For people living in the 1900’s? __________ • Why did American families living in the colonial period want and need to have large families? (to help work the farm – most people lived on farms and grew their own food (no grocery stores). What are some factors that led to low life expectancies in the American Colonial period? (In the 1700’s there were a couple scarlet fever epidemics (1735-‐40, 1786); during the civil war typhoid epidemics and malaria claimed lives; there was a flu epidemic in 1857-‐59 and 1918-‐19 (Spanish Flu infected 1/5 of world population with 3% dying). • Why are life expectancies throughout the world so different? (There are great variations in life expectancy between different parts of the world, mostly caused by differences in public health, medical care, and diet. The impact of AIDS on life expectancy is particularly notable in many African countries). Models and Explanations: In this lab we explored survivorship curves and population growth rates. A student who demonstrates understanding of these concepts can explain why population growth rates are different today than they were over 100 years ago, and can explain why modern Americans have a Type I survivorship curve. This student can also, given some life history details of an organism, such as size, reproductive patterns, fecundity, and life span, predict if the species will show a Type I, II, or III survivorship curve. Bibliography: Campbell Biology (9th edition). (2010). Benjamin Cummings Publishing. Condran, G. and E. Crimmins. 1980. Mortality differentials between rural and urban areas of states of the northeastern United States 1890-‐1900. Journal of Historical Geography 6 (2): 179-‐202. Dethlefsen, E.S. and K. Jensen. 1977. Social commentary for the cemetery. Natural History 86(6) 32-‐29. Kuntz, S. 1984. Mortality change in America, 1620-‐1920. Human Bio. 56: 559-‐582. Lee, R. (2003). The Demographic Transition: Three Centuries of Fundamental Change. Journal of Economic Perspectives 17:(4) -‐ 167–190. Pike, L., Krebs, J., Stoeckmann, A., Steinmetz, J., Ludlam, J., Malakauskas, D.; Malakauskas, S.; and Vanderhoff, N. (2013). Biology 103L Environmental Biology Laboratory, 3rd edition. Francis Marion University custom publishing, Florence SC, USA. Pike, L., and B. Fox. (2002). Project Intermath (COMAP): Survival of Early Americans. Retrieved October 1, 2014 from http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=3&ved=0CCwQFjAC &url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cengage.com%2Fmath%2Fbook_content%2F0495011592_gi ordano%2Fstudent_cd%2Filaps%2Fsurvival_americans.pdf&ei=RxMsVNe9IsylyATmgYLoD Q&usg=AFQjCNFZlKSYocXf2C-‐gUiTHEuxMND5iDw&bvm=bv.76477589,d.aWw Pianka, E. (1970). On r and k selection. The American Naturalist 104 (940): 592-‐597 Age Interval (years) Age at Death (years) (List the separate ages of death for each individual who died in this age interval. The total goes in the next column). # who died during interval Survivorship (# still alive) % Survivorship ( # still alive / total number of people in cohort) x100 0-‐1 2-‐9 10-‐19 20-‐29 30-‐39 40-‐49 50-‐59 60-‐69 70-‐79 80-‐89 90-‐99 100+ TOTAL 50 50 0 0 Table 2. FEMALES who died before 1900 (Lived in 1800s): What was the average age of death (average life expectancy)? ____________ Maximum life span ?________________ Now, Plot the survivorship versus age intervals for both males and females who died before 1900 on ONE graph. Age Interval (years) Age at Death (years) (List the separate ages of death for each individual who died in this age interval. The total goes in the next column) # who died during interval Survivorship (# still alive) % Survivorship ( # still alive / total number of people in cohort) x100 0-‐1 2-‐9 10-‐19 20-‐29 30-‐39 40-‐49 50-‐59 60-‐69 70-‐79 80-‐89 90-‐99 100+ TOTAL 50 50 0 0 Table 3: MALES who died after 1980 (Lived in 1900s): What was the average age of death (average life expectancy)? ____________ Maximum life span ?________________ Age Interval (years) Age at Death (years) (List the separate ages of death for each individual who died in this age interval. The total goes in the next column). # who died during interval Survivorship (# still alive) % Survivorship ( # still alive / total number of people in cohort) x100 0-‐1 2-‐9 10-‐19 20-‐29 30-‐39 40-‐49 50-‐59 60-‐69 70-‐79 80-‐89 90-‐99 100+ TOTAL 50 50 0 0 Table 4. FEMALES who died after 1980 (Lived in 1900s): What was the average age of death (average life expectancy)? ____________ Maximum life span ?________________ Now, Plot the survivorship versus age intervals for both males and females who died before 1900 on ONE graph.