Download Hypothesis Testing Examples - Economic Statistics | ECON 210 and more Exams Economic statistics in PDF only on Docsity! University of Wisconsin Milwaukee ECON 210-002 Spring 2004 Ozlem Eren 6.2 HYPOTHESIS TESTING- EXAMPLES Stating the Null and Alternative 1. An ecologist would like to show that Milwaukee has an air pollution problem. Specifically, she would like to show that the mean level of carbon monoxide in downtown Milwaukee air is higher than 4.9 parts per million. State the null and the alternative hypotheses. Solution: To state the hypotheses we first need to identify the population parameter in question and the value to which it is being compared. The āmean level of carbon monoxide pollutionā is the mean level Āµ and the 4.9 parts per million is the specific value. Our ecologist is questioning the value of Āµ. Recall: i. The null hypothesis states that the parameter in question has a specified value. ii. A sample mean is going to be used as the basis for an inference about the population mean, and sample means have an approximately normal distribution as described by the central limit theorem. iii. A normal distribution is determined when its mean and standard deviation are specified. All this is suggesting that the statement containing the equal sign will become the null hypothesis; the other statement becomes the alternative hypothesis. Thus we have: H0 : Āµ = 4.9 Ha : Āµ > 4.9 Recall that once the null hypothesis is stated, we proceed with the hypothesis test under the assumption that the null hypothesis is true. Thus Āµ = 4.9 locates the center of the sampling distribution of sample means. For that reason the null hypothesis will be written with an equal sign only. 2. The āmean level of carbon monoxide in downtown Milwaukee is not 4.9 parts per millionā. State the null and alternative hypotheses that correspond to this statement. Solution: H0 : Āµ = 4.9 Ha : Āµ ā 4.9 University of Wisconsin Milwaukee ECON 210-002 Spring 2004 Ozlem Eren The Complete Hypothesis Testing Procedure 3. For many semesters an instructor has recorded his studentsā grades, and the mean for all these studentsā grades, Āµ, is 72. The current class of 36 students seems to be better than average in ability and the instructor wants to show that according to their average āthe current class is superior to the previous classesā. Does the class mean of 75.2 present sufficient evidence to support the instructorās claim that the current class is superior? Use Ī± = 0.005 and Ļ = 12 Solution: To be superior this class must have a mean grade that is higher than the mean of all previous classes. Step 1: H0 : Āµ = 72 Step 2: Ha : Āµ > 72 (class is superior) Step 3: The level of significance Ī± = 0.05 is given in the statement of the problem. The standard score z is used as the test statistic when the null hypothesis is about a population mean and the standard deviation is known. The critical region āi.e. values of the standard score z that will cause a rejection of the null hypothesis- has an area of 0.05 and is located at the extreme right of the distribution. The critical region is on the right because large values of the sample mean suggest āsuperiorā, while values near or below 72 support the null hypothesis. The critical region has an area of 0.05 and a critical value of +1.65 (obtained from z table). Step 4: The value of the test statistic z will be found by using formula Z = n x Ļ Āµā And the sample information x = 75.2 and n = 36. Z= 6.1 2 2.3 36 12 722.75 == ā Z* = 1.60 (we will use an asterisk, *, for the calculated value of the test statistic) Step 5: We now compare the calculated test statistic, z*, to the test criteria set up in Step 3 by locating the calculated value on the diagram and placing an asterisk at that value.