Important Case Laws - Competition Law, Cheat Sheet of Competition Law and Policy

Download Important Case Laws - Competition Law and more Cheat Sheet Competition Law and Policy in PDF only on Docsity! The Competition Act, 2002 is an important law in India that aims to promote competition in the market and prevent anti-competitive practices. Here are some of the important case laws under the Competition Act, 2002: 1. Excel Crop Care Limited v. Competition Commission of India (2017): In this case, the Competition Commission of India (CCI) imposed a penalty on Excel Crop Care Limited for abuse of dominance. However, the penalty was reduced by the Competition Appellate Tribunal (COMPAT) on the ground that the CCI had not taken into account certain relevant factors. The Supreme Court upheld the decision of COMPAT. 2. Competition Commission of India v. Co-ordination Committee of Artists and Technicians of W. B. Film and Television and Ors. (2017): In this case, the CCI imposed a penalty on the Co- ordination Committee of Artists and Technicians of W. B. Film and Television for engaging in anti-competitive practices. The penalty was upheld by the COMPAT. 3. MCX Stock Exchange Ltd. v. Securities and Exchange Board of India (2013): In this case, the issue was whether the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) had the power to regulate stock exchanges. The COMPAT held that SEBI had the power to regulate stock exchanges, but the matter was later referred to the Supreme Court. 4. Competition Commission of India v. Google LLC and Ors. (2020): In this case, the CCI found Google LLC guilty of abusing its dominant position in the market for online search engines. Google was fined for using its dominant position to promote its own services over those of its competitors. 5. SAIL v. Competition Commission of India (2010): In this case, the CCI imposed a penalty on the Steel Authority of India Limited (SAIL) for abuse of dominance. The penalty was later reduced by the COMPAT. These are some of the important case laws under the Competition Act, 2002. There have been many other cases that have helped to shape the interpretation and implementation of the Act. Abuse of dominant position refers to the use of market power by a dominant player in a particular market to restrict competition or harm competitors. Here are some important case laws in India related to abuse of dominant position: 1. Excel Crop Care Limited v. Competition Commission of India (2017): In this case, the Supreme Court of India upheld the decision of the Competition Appellate Tribunal (COMPAT) that Excel Crop Care Limited had abused its dominant position by imposing unfair conditions on its distributors. 2. Competition Commission of India v. Google LLC and Ors. (2020): The CCI found Google LLC guilty of abusing its dominant position in the market for online search engines. Google was fined for promoting its own services over those of its competitors. 3. Indian National Shipowners’ Association v. Commission of India (2013): In this case, the COMPAT held that the Indian National Shipowners’ Association had abused its dominant position by fixing prices and allocating business among its members. 4. Reliance Industries Limited v. Indian Oil Corporation Limited (2016): In this case, the CCI found that Reliance Industries Limited had abused its dominant position in the market for production and supply of petroleum products by imposing unfair conditions on its customers. 5. Shamsher Kataria v. Honda Siel Cars India Ltd. (2014): In this case, the Supreme Court held that the principles of abuse of dominant position could be applied to the relationship between a manufacturer and its dealers. These are some of the important case laws related to abuse of dominant position in India. The Competition Act, 2002 is an important law in this regard, and the Competition Commission of India is the regulatory body responsible for enforcing it. Here are some important case laws related to anti-competitive agreements under the Competition Act, 2002: 1. Excel Crop Care Limited v. Competition Commission of India (2017): In this case, the Supreme Court upheld the CCI's finding that Excel Crop Care Limited had entered into anti- competitive agreements with its distributors by imposing unfair conditions. 2. In Re: Cartelization in respect of tenders floated by Indian Railways for supply of Brushless DC Fans and other electrical items (2018): The CCI found that several companies had formed a cartel and rigged bids for the supply of electrical items to the Indian Railways, violating the provisions of the Competition Act, 2002. 3. Competition Commission of India v. Hyundai Motor India Limited and Ors. (2014): The CCI found that Hyundai Motor India Limited had entered into anti-competitive agreements with its dealers by imposing restrictions on the sale of spare parts and diagnostic tools to independent repairers, leading to a violation of the Competition Act, 2002. 4. Builders Association of India v. Cement Manufacturers’ Association and Ors. (2016): In this case, the CCI found that the Cement Manufacturers’ Association and its member companies had entered into anti-competitive agreements to control the supply and price of cement in the market, leading to a violation of the Competition Act, 2002. 5. Indian National Shipowners’ Association v. Commission of India (2013): The COMPAT held that the Indian National Shipowners’ Association had entered into anti-competitive agreements by fixing prices and allocating business among its members, leading to a violation of the Competition Act, 2002. These are some important case laws related to anti-competitive agreements under the Competition Act, 2002. The Competition Commission of India is the regulatory body responsible for enforcing the Competition Act, 2002. Combination refers to mergers and acquisitions between two or more entities, or the acquisition of control, shares, voting rights, or assets by one entity over another. Here are some important case laws related to combinations under the Competition Act, 2002: 1. Combination Registration No. C-2018/08/587 - Walmart/Flipkart (2019): The CCI approved the acquisition of Flipkart by Walmart, subject to certain conditions, after a thorough examination of the potential impact of the combination on competition in the relevant market.