Introduction to Green Walls Technology, Benefits & Design, Essays (high school) of English

Download Introduction to Green Walls Technology, Benefits & Design and more Essays (high school) English in PDF only on Docsity! Introduction to Green Walls Technology, Benefits & Design September 2008 Developed by: Sponsored by: Green Roofs for Healthy Cities: Introduction to Green Walls – www.greenroofs.org 2 Table of Contents Introduction 3 Nomenclature 4 Green Facades 5 Living Walls 8 Benefits of Green Facades and Living Walls 12 Public Benefits of Green Walls 13 Private Benefits of Green Walls 15 Design Specific Benefits 16 Improved Aesthetics 17 Increased Biodiversity 20 Urban Agriculture 20 Factors for Successful Green Facades 22 Factors for Flourishing Living Walls 23 Maintenance 24 Standards, Policies and Incentives 25 LEED® Certification 26 Budget 29 Conclusion 29 Case Studies Pritzker Family Children's Zoo at Lincoln Park Zoo (Cable System) 30 MFO Park (Cable and Wire-Rope Net System) 31 The Marketplace at Oviedo Crossing (Modular Trellis System) 32 171 Broadway Restaurant (Modular Living Wall) 33 Living Wall at the Aquaquest Learning Centre (Modular Living Wall) 34 Acknowledgements 35 Resources and References 35 Green Roofs for Healthy Cities: Introduction to Green Walls – www.greenroofs.org 5 Green Facades Green facades are a type of green wall system in which climbing plants or cascading groundcovers are trained to cover specially designed supporting structures. Rooted at the base of these structures, in the ground, in intermediate planters or even on rooftops, the plants typically take 3-5 years before achieving full coverage. Green facades can be anchored to existing walls or built as freestanding structures, such as fences or columns. Self-clinging plants such as English Ivy have commonly been used to create green walls. Their sucker root structure enables them to attach directly to a wall, covering entire surfaces. These aggressive plants can damage unsuitable walls and/or pose difficulties when the time comes for building maintenance and plant removal. Technological innovations in Europe and North America have resulted in the development of new trellises, rigid panels and cable systems to support vines, while keeping them away from walls and other building surfaces. Two green facade systems that are frequently used are Modular Trellis Panel and Cable and Wire-Rope Net systems. Each of these systems is described below. Modular Trellis Panel System The building block of this modular system is a rigid, light weight, three-dimensional panel made from a powder coated galvanized and welded steel wire that supports plants with both a face grid and a panel depth. This system is designed to hold a green facade off the wall surface so that plant materials do not attach to the building, provides a “captive” growing environment for the plant with multiple supports for the tendrils, and helps to maintain the integrity of a building membrane. Panels can be stacked and joined to cover large areas, or formed to create shapes and curves, are made from recycled- content steel and are recyclable. Because the panels are rigid, they can span between structures and can also be used for freestanding green walls. Above: Ivy attaches to a building using aggressive adhesive suckers or climbing roots that can damage surfaces and enter voids and cracks. Source: greenscreen® Green Roofs for Healthy Cities: Introduction to Green Walls – www.greenroofs.org 6 Left: Close up of Modular Trellis Panel system. Source: greenscreen® Middle left: A wall mounted Modular Trellis Panel System being fastened for support. Middle right: A freestanding green wall being used for screening equipment. Bottom: A well-trimmed and mature green wall using the modular trellis panel system. Source: greenscreen® Green Roofs for Healthy Cities: Introduction to Green Walls – www.greenroofs.org 7 Cable and Wire-Rope Net Systems The cable and wire-rope net systems use either cables and/or a wire-net. Cables are employed on green facades that are designed to support faster growing climbing plants with denser foliage. Wire-nets are often used to support slower growing plants that need the added support these systems provide at closer intervals. They are more flexible and provide a greater degree of design applications than cables. Both systems use high tensile steel cables, anchors and supplementary equipment. Various sizes and patterns can be accommodated as flexible vertical and horizontal wire-ropes are connected through cross clamps. Top: Cable system close up showing cross clamp connector. Source: Jakob Bottom photos: The wire-net system is more flexible than cables and is pre-fabricated to a specific design (shown during installation with temporary ties). Right is a sketch of a wire net system. Wire net systems are stretched, and may use a variety of connectors. Source: Carl Stahl DecorCable Innovations Green Roofs for Healthy Cities: Introduction to Green Walls – www.greenroofs.org 10 Left: A living wall constructed from modular pre- grown panels installed in an interior patio. Source: Elevated Landscape Technologies Middle left: A standard modular unit before planting. Source: Green Living Technologies Middle right: A pre-grown modular panel being prepared for installation. Source: Green Living Technologies Bottom: A living wall constructed from multiple modular units. Source: Elevated Landscape Technologies Green Roofs for Healthy Cities: Introduction to Green Walls – www.greenroofs.org 11 Vegetated Mat Wall The ‘Mur Vegetal’ is a unique form of green wall pioneered by Patrick Blanc. It is composed of two layers of synthetic fabric with pockets that physically support plants and growing media. The fabric walls are supported by a frame and backed by a waterproof membrane against the building wall because of its high moisture content. Nutrients are primarily distributed through an irrigation system that cycles water from the top of the system down. Biofiltration An ‘active’ living wall is intended to be integrated into a building’s infrastructure and designed to biofilter indoor air and provide thermal regulation. It is a hydroponic system fed by nutrient rich water which is re-circulated from a manifold, located at the top of the wall, and collected in a gutter at the bottom of the fabric wall system. Plant roots are sandwiched between two layers of synthetic fabric that support microbes and a dense root mass. These root microbes remove airborne volatile organic compounds (VOCs), while foliage absorbs carbon monoxide and dioxide. The plants’ natural processes produce cool fresh air that is drawn through the system by a fan and then distributed throughout the building. A variation of this concept could be applied to green facade systems as well, and there is potential to apply a hybrid of systems at a large scale. Left: Mur Vegetal Source: Patrick Blanc Above: The basic mechanics of a biofiltration wall. Source: GM Canada and Air Quality Solutions, Naturaire Left: Mur Vegetal Source: Patrick Blanc Green Roofs for Healthy Cities: Introduction to Green Walls – www.greenroofs.org 12 Landscape Walls These walls are an evolution of landscape 'berms' and a strategic tool in an approach to 'living' architecture. Landscape walls are typically sloped as opposed to vertical and have the primary function of noise reduction and slope stabilization. They usually are structured from some form of stacking material made of plastic or concrete with room for growing media and plants. Benefits of Green Facades and Living Walls There are significant benefits to both the public and private sectors resulting from the successful use of green walls. Green walls have a great potential for positive environmental change in dense urban areas, particularly given the large surface areas on buildings that are available for retrofitting to these technologies. For example, the emissions that can concentrate in multi-level parking areas in downtown cores can be reduced by the presence of large leafy areas. A green wall with a mass of plant leaf material can absorb carbon oxides and heavy metal particles while shading and screening these large structures. Above: Examples of landscape walls – typically used for noise reduction. Source: TensarEarth Technologies (above left), Deltalok GTX (above right) Above: A large parking structure with a cable system green facade. Source: Jakob Green Roofs for Healthy Cities: Introduction to Green Walls – www.greenroofs.org 15 Private Benefits of Green Walls Area of Impact Description Benefits Improved Energy Efficiency Improves thermal insulation capacity through external temperature regulation. The extent of the savings depends on various factors such as climate, distance from sides of buildings, building envelope type, and density of plant coverage. This can impact both the cooling and heating. • Traps a layer of air within the plant mass • Limits movement of heat through thick vegetation mass • Reduces ambient temperature via shading and plant processes of evapotranspiration • May create a buffer against the wind during the winter months • Interior applications may reduce energy associated with heating and cooling outdoor air for indoor use. Building Structure Protection Buildings are exposed to the weathering elements and over time some of the organic construction materials may begin to break down, as a result of contraction and expansion shifts due to freeze-thaw cycles and UV exposure. • Protects exterior finishes from UV radiation, the elements, and temperature fluctuations that wear down materials. • May benefit the seal or air tightness of doors, windows, and cladding by decreasing the effect of wind pressure. Improved Indoor Air Quality For interior projects, green walls are able to filter contaminates that are regularly flushed out of buildings through traditional ventilation systems. The filtration is performed by plants, and in the case of bio-filtration, micro-organisms. • Captures airborne pollutants such as dust and pollen • Filters noxious gases and VOC’s from carpets, furniture and other building elements Noise Reduction The growing media in living wall systems will contribute to a reduction of sound levels that transmit through or reflect from the living wall system. Factors that influence noise reduction include the depth of the growing media, the materials used as structural components of the living wall system, and the overall coverage. LEED® Green walls contribute directly to achieving credits, or contribute to earning credits when used with other sustainable building elements. (See below) Marketing Improved aesthetics may help to market a project and provide valuable amenity space. Green Roofs for Healthy Cities: Introduction to Green Walls – www.greenroofs.org 16 Design Specific Benefits Value can be added to the installation of green walls by designing for a variety of specific benefits. Most green walls are implemented to create an element of aesthetic diversity that adds to the palette of building materials and the surfaces created. Designers of green walls can work at a great range of scales, from the creation of small private space interactions like intimate garden settings, to the monumental scale of a multistory project. Green walls can also be integrated into the entire building site design and utilize multiple systems and forms. Specific benefits can include security, privacy screening, shade, biodiversity, habitat, and even urban agriculture. These design specific benefits are not mutually exclusive. Above: A green wall designed with aesthetics and biodiversity in mind. Source: George Irwin Bottom left: A living wall created to provide a variation of visual textures. Source: Green Living Technologies Bottom right: Flowering green wall elements celebrate a pedestrian entryway. Source: greenscreen® Green Roofs for Healthy Cities: Introduction to Green Walls – www.greenroofs.org 17 Improved Aesthetics Currently, aesthetic improvements are the primary design objective for most green wall projects. Large parking structures, campus buildings, urban streets with repetitive facades, public park buildings, transit shelters, retail buildings, all provide an opportunity to design with green walls to create aesthetic improvement. Implementing patterns, rhythms, and shapes and the use of plant textures and the inviting qualities of designing with nature can all contribute to aesthetic improvement. Wall mounted and freestanding green walls can be used to screen and isolate views. They can be used to hide mechanical equipment, service areas, storage access and other aspects of a building’s system requirements that detract from the aesthetic experience. These opportunities also exist for interior applications and for the integration into rooftop environments. Plant materials used for green facades and living walls can be flowering, may change color with the season’s change, or may be deciduous and change their visual character significantly. Because of the vertical nature of a green “wall” they create large and efficient green areas while using a relatively small footprint. Aesthetic value relates to human interaction and not to the quantitative evaluation of materials and system performance aspects of a building. Creating green wall elements for a waiting zone, a healing garden, a building entrance, or a rooftop garden could take advantage of the measurable improvements to the human condition that plants can provide. This specific benefit is an improvement to the quality of the human experience in the built environment. Top left: A flowering living wall. Source: Elevated Landscape Technologies Above: Cool amenity spaces. Source: Manfred Koehler Left: Freestanding green walls create variation in a hardscape environment. Source: greenscreen® Green Roofs for Healthy Cities: Introduction to Green Walls – www.greenroofs.org 20 Increased Biodiversity The use of green walls to support biodiversity is being explored and current research on the abilities of green wall systems to provide this benefit is scarce. Most studies have centered on green roofs in the urban environment and their ability to provide habitat for a wide range of animal and plant species. Research in England, Switzerland, Canada and the U.S. has identified plants, birds and insects that can survive successfully on rooftop environments. Green walls with the potential to link to the roof, provide a natural extension of this environment. Large scale green wall projects have been created to use indigenous native plant species and create habitat as urban reforestation. In North America a pioneering program has been developed to create corridors of habitat for migratory species and the potential for utilizing green walls is being explored. By supporting native plant growth and creating necessary habitat, participants and site locations can become “certified” into this nurturing program. (National Wildlife Federation, www.nwf.org). The design of green walls for biodiversity or ecological restoration requires that the designers or their consultants have an intimate knowledge of the requirements of the plants in the region where the project is being implemented, as well as the specific needs of the various fauna. Some climbing plants such as Climbing Hydrangea (Hydrangea anonomala petiolaris) a perennial, and Morning Glory (Impomea tricolor), an annual, are known to attract butterflies and hummingbirds. Designers are encouraged, along with willing clients, to explore these opportunities and to expand available knowledge in this specialized area. This project photo illustrates the interconnection between the ponds, which utilize a variety of wetland plants, and the green wall. The ponds are part of the stormwater and filtration management system and native deciduous plants were selected to help recreate habitat. The green wall provides additional shading benefits. Urban Agriculture Green walls have yet to be extensively studied as a forum for urban agriculture, but this potential specific benefit is obvious. Where land is scarce, green walls of many sizes can utilize their vertical aspect to grow a variety of crops. The coordinator for the Urban Management Program for UN-Habitat has written that the research of the last two decades indicates that,”…urban agriculture has multiple roles and functions and plays an important role in: enhancing urban food security, nutrition, and health…and urban greening and maintenance of green open spaces…” A green wall designed for urban agriculture can provide a multitude of benefits such as providing the basis for better community interaction (community gardening), improving access to fresh food (a significant problem in poorer neighborhoods); and reducing the environmental impacts associated with traditional food production and distribution. Above: A freestanding green facade is planted with four varieties of indigenous vines to help reestablish habitat. Source: greenscreen® Green Roofs for Healthy Cities: Introduction to Green Walls – www.greenroofs.org 21 These photos show examples of products that can be grown on green walls designed for agriculture. On the right are modular living wall panels. Sources: www.museums.org (top left), Randy Sharp (bottom left), Green Living Technologies (right) Green Roofs for Healthy Cities: Introduction to Green Walls – www.greenroofs.org 22 Factors for Successful Green Facades Design, installation and maintenance considerations for green facades and living walls will vary by system type selected and the conditions of the built and natural environment. Green facade projects require that the designers, installers, manufacturers and maintenance staff take the following into careful consideration: • Attachment to building envelope – how the system will be secured to the building or freestanding structure. • Calculation of structural loads for larger systems, resulting from loads such as snow, plants, and wind. • Plant selection for wind and light exposure, hardiness zones, and amenity context. • Realistic expectations related to plant aesthetics and growth – some systems require 3 to 5 years to become fully established. • Plant maintenance and/or long term maintenance plan to secure the health of these living systems, including proper soil and irrigation considerations. • Check with manufacturers who may have registered or specially trained installers that will be able to complete the project successfully. • Appropriate plant selection for the geographic region, correct plant spacing for desired coverage, and release from the temporary support structure used by the nursery. Above left: Several multi-story green walls thrive with correct plant spacing and adequate irrigation and nutrients. Source: greenscreen® Above right: A cable system supports a section of green wall showing a riot of color. Source: Carl Stahl DecorCable Innovations Green Roofs for Healthy Cities: Introduction to Green Walls – www.greenroofs.org 25 Standards, Policies and Incentives Because the implementation of new green wall technologies is still relatively new, there are currently no North American performance standards that deal specifically with the installation of green facades or living walls and few of the numerous benefits have been fully quantified. Of the limited number of policy programs in place to encourage green wall construction, one outstanding example is a new ordinance passed by the City of Seattle (outlined below). In terms of incentives to build green walls, the US and Canadian Green Building Councils offer a variety of achievable credits through the LEED® rating system (see p.26). Several cities have now adopted LEED® rating systems as the basis for their own standards in green building. Currently available in draft form, the Sustainable Sites Initiative is being co- produced by the American Society of Landscape Architects, the Ladybird Johnson Wildflower Center, and the U.S. Botanical Gardens. This document will give guidelines and suggestions for evaluating site conditions and will have a goal to create a system of values that can lead to sustainable development standards. Green walls have a role in contributing to the positive values in such a system. City of Seattle In 2007, the City of Seattle passed an ordinance in the Neighborhood Commercial (NC) zone, requiring that all developments have 30 percent vegetation coverage, or its functional equivalent (e.g. permeable surfaces in commercially zoned areas). A building applicant, architect or landscape architect chooses from a menu of landscape strategies including large trees, permeable paving, rain gardens, green roofs and green walls. The main drivers of the program are: • Improving microclimates and reducing the urban heat island effect. • Maintaining and improving soil function and water quality. • Enhancing the quality and quantity of plant and animal habitats. A design’s ability to meet this requirement is determined using the Seattle Green Factor, a weighted system that has been designed to support green infrastructure implementation by planners, building owners and designers. Additional weight is given to features using rainwater harvesting and/or low-water use planting techniques (e.g. larger trees, tree preservation, green roofs and green walls). The figure below graphically represents the weighting of the different greening methods. A worksheet has been developed that will assist applicants in calculating their "score," allowing them to try different feature combinations to reach the 30 percent regulatory requirement for greening. It is possible for freestanding green walls with two exposures to earn twice as many points as one affixed to a wall. Program details are available online at: http://www.seattle.gov/dclu/news/20060623a.asp Above: A large multi-level parking structure with a green facade. Source: greenscreen® Green Roofs for Healthy Cities: Introduction to Green Walls – www.greenroofs.org 26 LEED® Certification The US Green Building Council and Canadian Green Building Council’s Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED®) rating systems have become the touchstone for green buildings and are now being used by a wide number of jurisdictions as the basis for green building procurement, and in some cases regulatory requirements for the private sector. In LEED, higher ratings are synonymous with greater environmental benefits. The following is a summary of how green walls can contribute to securing up to 18 credits under the LEED® for new buildings. There is a need to have more green walls implemented as part of registered LEED buildings. SUSTAINABLE SITES CREDITS Sustainable site development reduces the impact of the building and its site on the larger urban and global environment. Opportunities for a building that incorporates a green wall to reduce its impact on the surrounding environment include: The green factor of Seattle shows that green walls will become a significant factor for greening the city in the next few years. Source: City of Seattle Above: The Aquarium Learning Center at the Vancouver Aquarium registered for LEED® Gold. Source: Randy Sharp Green Roofs for Healthy Cities: Introduction to Green Walls – www.greenroofs.org 27 SS Credit 7.1 Landscape Design That Reduces Urban Heat Islands, Non-Roof (1 Point) Reduce heat islands (thermal gradient differences between developed and undeveloped areas) to minimize impact on microclimate and human and wildlife habitat. Exterior green walls reduce the solar reflectance of a structure and thereby impact the urban heat island effect, helping to moderate the city’s temperature. The LEED® rating system recommends “considering replacing constructed surfaces (i.e. roofs, walls, sidewalks, etc.) with vegetated surfaces such as green walls and open grid paving or specify high-albedo (light reflective) materials to reduce the heat absorption.” WATER EFFICIENCY (WE) CREDITS Storm water management and water conservation measures have the potential to save an enormous amount of water while reducing the demands on the urban infrastructure to supply and treat waste water generated from a building and reduce the impact of large areas of hard surfaces on local water bodies. WE Credit 1.1: Water Efficient Landscaping: Reduce by 50% (1 point) Limit or eliminate the use of potable water, or other natural surface or subsurface water resources available on or near the project site, for landscape irrigation. A building can incorporate a collection system to store storm water from the buildings site and roof surfaces to be used for irrigation of the green walls and other landscape features. WE Credit 1.2: Water Efficient Landscaping: No Potable Water Use or No Irrigation (1 Point in addition to WE Credit 1.1) Eliminate the use of potable water, or other natural surface or subsurface water resources available on or near the project site, for landscape irrigation. Using only captured, recycled water or non-potable water for irrigation will allow projects to achieve this additional credit. One could also design a green wall that does not require irrigation. WE Credit 2: Innovative Wastewater Technologies (1 Point) Reduce generation of wastewater and potable water demand, while increasing the local aquifer recharge. Green walls can be utilized as wastewater treatment media through a number of innovative techniques. The incorporation of compost tea from a composting toilet is another innovative use of a green wall to aid in reducing wastewater generation. This is not recommended for indoor air quality living walls. Above: Conceptual image of the EDITT Tower in Singapore, designed with a grey water filtration system that includes water-purification, water and sewage recycling. Only 45% of building water usage draws from the main water supply. Source:TR Hamzah & Yeang Sdn Bhd Green Roofs for Healthy Cities: Introduction to Green Walls – www.greenroofs.org 30 Case Studies The following case studies give some indication of the range of costs you are likely to find for different types of applications; descriptions of the design goals; and an overview of the project solutions. Pritzker Family Children's Zoo at Lincoln Park Zoo (Cable System) Location: Chicago, IL New construction or retrofit: New Date of implementation: 2004 Size: 4,000 sq.ft Cost: $7800 Green Wall System: Plants used: Vitis Riparia; Riverbank Grape (Special Hybrid) Structural support information: 4mm stainless steel vertical wire ropes and 4mmø horizontal wire rods connected in a rectangular grid using UV-Resistant cross clamps. Hand-installed terminal end fittings allowed field trimming of ropes and rods for simplified installation. System attachment and tensioning allows easy dismount/remount for plant control and building maintenance. Project Overview: Design objectives / criteria: Create a natural, imaginative, multi-sensory experience of the North American woods and the creatures that call it home Provide a variety of opportunities to experience and learn for children of different age levels Filter out urban distractions by managing the placement of topographic elements, buildings, and animal exhibits. Design solutions/decisions: The vine support system that fronts the west side of the zoo building accomplishes several goals: it helps control late afternoon summer heat gain in the building by acting as a natural sunshade; allows winter heat gain for natural heating when the deciduous vine leaves drop in the fall; and looking outward, it resembles the view through a tree canopy. For those looking down on the Pritzker Family Children’s Zoo from the surrounding high-rises, it helps the building blend into the woods that have been created around it. In addition, the structure is quite safe as the cross clamps allow the horizontal rods to slip as force is applied, eliminating any horizontal climbing elements. Source: Carl Stahl DecorCable Innovations Green Roofs for Healthy Cities: Introduction to Green Walls – www.greenroofs.org 31 MFO Park (Cable and Wire-Rope Net System) Location: Zurich, Switzerland New construction or retrofit: Retrofit Date of implementation: May 2002 Size: 37 500 sq.ft. (328ft x 114ft) Cost: $180,000 (materials) Green wall system: Plants used: Fallopia aubertii Vitis coignetiae Campsis radicans Celastrus orbiculatus Ampelopisis brevipedunculata Structural support system information: Steel Structure with tensioned stainless steel cables. Project overview: Design objectives/criteria: To create a green environment within an industrial zone where people come to relax and have lunch without truly leaving the city. It is also used for events such as open-air cinemas in the summer and various festivals. Design solutions/decisions: The structure needed to be as tall as 56ft as the other factories surrounding it. Finding plants to grow this tall was particularly difficult. As a result the wall was designed with different levels of planter boxes with various plant types. The base level used Ampelopisis brevipedunculata to grow to a maximum of 20ft. The second level used Campsis radicans and Celastrus orbiculatus to grow a medium height of 43ft. The third level used Fallopia aubertii and Vitis coignetiae to grow up to 56ft. Source: All photos Jakob Green Roofs for Healthy Cities: Introduction to Green Walls – www.greenroofs.org 32 The Marketplace at Oviedo Crossing (Modular Trellis System) Location: Oviedo, FL., (East of Orlando) New Construction or Retrofit: New Date of Opening: March 5th, 1998 Size: 100,175 sq. ft. Cost of underlying system: $426,000 Green Wall System: Plants Used: Confederate Jasmine, trachelospermum jasminoides Structural support system: Wall-mounted greenscreen® panels #5132 clips and #5105 steel edge trim Project Overview: After creating high-profile ‘Festival’ marketplaces in Boston (Faneuil Hall) and Miami (Bayside Marketplace), the developers stated that they wished to differentiate the Oviedo project from the others. They were challenged to create a sense of place without being able to depend on the historic setting of central Boston or the elegant architectural texture of Miami Beach. Design schemes involving elaborate surface treatments of exterior blockwork were proposed and put aside in favor of a strategy incorporating “a wall of green” that acknowledged the lush rural environment of the Orlando area. A green wall, thick with flowering vines, that ranges from 16-90 feet in height, created the desired effect. A second objective was to integrate the outside of the building with the interior. The central food court and play area resemble a huge greenhouse with a sweeping view of two forested wetlands, one on each side, and a brook that meanders from the patio outside through the food court. Vegetated trellises comprised of over 2000 greenscreen® panels flank all sides of the building and entranceways to the 830,000 sq. ft. mall. Vines were contract grown to have tendrils at least 7 feet long before being woven into the greenscreen® panels and were planted one month to one week before the opening. The ambitious greening project was a new venture for the developer, who chose to reject more expensive decorative exterior architectural proposals in favor of an integrated green wall and landscape design approach. Source: All photos greenscreen® Green Roofs for Healthy Cities: Introduction to Green Walls – www.greenroofs.org 35 Design objectives/criteria:The team took a daring approach with a new vegetated building envelope system; the first modular living wall installation in North America. A range of custom designs was explored before final selection of a well-proven modular living wall system. G-Sky provided all components required for the green wall – panels with frame, irrigation, native plants, growing medium – plus the installation and maintenance of the complete system. Sharp & Diamond’s original plant ‘wish list’ of 15 possible species included ferns, grasses, sedums, perennial wildflowers and evergreen groundcovers. G-Sky participated in the success of the project by testing these plant species to identify suitable candidates. Sword ferns and fescue grasses propagated very quickly, but their fast growth and clumping root systems applied excessive pressure inside the containers. The rubbery branches of the native BC Sedums were tender and susceptible to breakage from wind and daily handling by hundreds of school children. In the final analysis, tough hardy native groundcovers, ferns and wildflowers were selected. The Green Wall Panels were pre-grown in a greenhouse, delivered to the site and installed in one day to create an instant green wall. Acknowledgements We thank our Green Wall Committee members for their invaluable expertise and support in the development of this paper: Reuben Freed, greenscreen® Greg Garner, Elevated Landscape Technologies, Ltd Patrick S. Kelly, Carl Stahl DecorCable Innovations Shane Debisingh, Jakob Steven Peck, Green Roofs for Healthy Cities George Irwin, Green Living Technologies This paper was co-authored by: Randy Sharp, Sharp & Diamond Landscape Architecture Inc., James Sable, greenscreen®, Flavia Bertram and Eva Mohan, Green Roofs for Healthy Cities. Steven Peck, Green Roofs for Healthy Cities Resources and References Auld, H 2003, ‘Modeling the Urban Heat Island Benefits of Green Roofs ion Toronto’, in Proc. of 1st North American Green Roof Conference: Greening Rooftops for Sustainable Communities, Chicago. 29-30 May, The Cardinal Group, Toronto. Brenneisen, Dr S 2004, ‘The Benefits of Biodiversity from Green Roofs – Key Design Consequences’, in Proc. of 1st North American Green Roof Conference: Greening Rooftops for Sustainable Communities, Chicago. 29-30 May, The Cardinal Group, Toronto. Brenneisen, Dr S 2004, ‘From Biodiversity Strategies to Agricultural Productivity’, in Proc. of 2nd North American Green Roof Conference: Greening Rooftops for Sustainable Communities, Portland, Ore. 2-4 June 2004, The Cardinal Group, Toronto. Brenneisen, Dr S 2005, ‘Green Roofs: Recapturing Urban Space for Wildlife’, in 4th Annual Greening Rooftops for Sustainable Communities Conference, May 2005, Boston, MA. Green Roofs for Healthy Cities: Introduction to Green Walls – www.greenroofs.org 36 Coffman, R & Martin, J 2004, ‘The Sustainability of an Agricultural Roof Garden’, in Proc. of 2nd North American Green Roof Conference: Greening Rooftops for Sustainable Communities, Portland, Ore. 2-4 June 2004, The Cardinal Group, Toronto. Deutsch, B & Whitlow, H 2005, ‘Re-Greening Washington, DC: A Green-roof Vision based on Environmental Benefits for Air Quality and Storm Water Management’, in 4th Annual Greening Rooftops for Sustainable Communities Conference, May 2005, Boston, MA. Dunnett, Dr N 2006, ‘Green Roofs for Biodiversity: Reconciling Aesthetics with Ecology’, in 4th Annual Greening Rooftops for Sustainable Communities Conference, May 2005, Boston, MA. Dunnett, N & Kingsbury, c. 2008, Planting Green Roofs and Living Walls, Revised and Updated Edition, Timber Press, Portland, Oregon. Gedge, D & Kadas, G 2004, ‘Bugs, Bees and Spiders: Green Roof Design for Rare Invertebrates’, in Proc. of 2nd North American Green Roof Conference: Greening Rooftops for Sustainable Communities, Portland, Ore. 2-4 June 2004, The Cardinal Group, Toronto. Köhler, Dr M 2003, ‘Plant Survival, Biodiversity and Stormwater among Extensive Green Roofs in Berlin and Neubrandenburg’, in Proc. of 1st North American Green Roof Conference: Greening Rooftops for Sustainable Communities, Chicago. 29-30 May, The Cardinal Group, Toronto. International Institute of Rural Reconstruction, International Development Research Center, 2006, Rene van Veenhuizen Editor, Urban Agriculture for Green and Productive Cities, ETC Urban Agriculture, The Netherlands. Lee, H 2006, ‘Research on the Scenic Meaning of Rooftop Greening with Semantic Differential Measure and Joint-count Statistics’, in 4th Annual Greening Rooftops for Sustainable Communities Conference, May 2005, Boston, MA. Green Walls 101 is the first green walls course presented by Green Roofs for Healthy Cities Inc. (North America) which introduces system and design issues in greater detail. This introductory training course on green wall infrastructure design presents an overview of the many tools and techniques needed to satisfy your green wall project objectives. The course will focus on: • Identifying the costs and benefits of green walls to reach your green wall performance goals; • Identifying a variety of green wall products and understanding the performance criteria of different green wall elements, and their relevance to your design intent; • Introducing the major design principles of a successful green wall project and discusses causes for error, which might lead to an unsuccessful project. For more information about this course, where it is being held in a location near you, and other training programs offered by Green Roofs for Healthy Cities, please visit our website at www.greenroofs.org. Green Roofs for Healthy Cities: Introduction to Green Walls – www.greenroofs.org 37 Test Questions (DRAFT) 1. Which of the following is a type of Living Wall system? A. Green Façade B. Modular Trellis Panel System C. Cable and Wire-Rope Net System D. Mur Vegetal 2. Which of the following is a type of Green Façade system? A. Mur Vegetal B. Biofiltration wall C. Cable and Wire-Rope Net System D. Landscape wall 3. A Modular Trellis Panel System is: A. Sometimes self-supporting B. Requires custom fabrication of materials C. Supports horizontal and vertical plant growth D. All of the above 4. Which of the following benefits is not ‘common’ to all green walls located on the sides of a building? A. Noise reduction B. Aesthetic improvement C. Indoor air quality improvement D. Energy efficiency 5. Project costs do not depend on which of the following: A. The mood of the architect and contractor B. Design team costs C. Availability of materials D. Location of project 6. Green walls provide visual stimulation in an environment in which people carry out their daily activities defines which public benefit? A. Urban Island Heat Effect B. Improved Air Quality C. Psychological Enhancement D. Aesthetic Improvement 7. The cooling energy given off green walls which alters the ambient air temperature addresses which issue? A. Urban Island Heat Effect B. Improved Air Quality C. Psychological Enhancement D. Aesthetic Improvement