Download The Role of Human Behavior and Culture in Sociology - Prof. James Hunter and more Study notes Introduction to Sociology in PDF only on Docsity! Sociology 12/08/2010 2 facts: human beings are social beings human behavior follows a frequent pattern these 2 facts cannot be divided/separated stereotypes are examples of extreme patterns sociology examines human tribes “that complex hole, which includes knowledge, belief, customs" culture = totality of human symbolic value invisible all aspects are learned or shared humans adaptable highly unstable don’t have instincts world makers create stability institutions normative patterns of human: o thinking o behavior o relating replace instincts Background Taken for granted Foreground Human thinking/individualism Arts + sciences discipline Interpretive discipline Gives a “fit for freedom” formation Freedom Realities with little control Says no to society Act contrary Philosophy of liberal arts 2 knowledges denigrated o poetic o substantive o engement celebrated Malleable Changeable o Invariable Invariable Moral nature Normative patterns = institutions Culture surrounds us Biological necessities trapped by culture What is becomes what should be The descriptive becomes the ethical Patterns of behavior become: Rules Expectations Norms = normal o culture 2% below 98% there is a relationship between: folkways: not strict mores: explicit moral sanction customs: sanctioned by tradition laws: enacted by those with political power power of culture Emile Durkheim o Social facts = patterns External Coersive All social groups have social control, which is: o self-imposed (internal) o external: violence inefficient economic pressure strikes walkouts bankruptcy informal ridicule gossip excluding o Garfunkel’s experiment Inverse relationship Deliberate violation of a norm Brings into relief all the unspoken norms Maintains moral order Life in culture: Boundaries o Walls within Everyone has to interact amongst each other Humans lack instincts Humans manipulate biology We have reflexes not instincts We learn norms o Socialization Process of social interaction Acquire personality Way of life The world belongs to humans Bio-drives o Society controls Freud Skinner We are bounded o Everything we do is bound by nature of this process social factors over which we have no choice Culture: o Trialectic: identities cannot exist without ideas and institutions Ervinh Goffman – 1959 o The presentation of self in everyday life Analogical thinking o Social interaction is a theatrical performance o Plays off Mead Extends to furthest degree o Front stage vs. back stage o Adornment For others not self Status difference, tribal affiliation, sexual information, personality If you play a role you must wear a costume Natural to us but not really natural Nonconformists are conforming to a role o Helps us see that our taken for granted social world is full of rules (hidden + powerful) o Foreground of choice of roles with predetermined rules o We are just actors People with masks Social interaction is a competition for attention o Infant need for attention is similar to need for food Distribution of attention (scarce) follows distribution of wealth + privilege = power Derber + Goffman both looking for hidden social rules both talking about power of culture on identities. Boundaries Norms Internally “I” is in the micro level and the “Me” in the macro level Externally Boundaries are set to “Fit in” Socialization o Humans don’t have instincts just reflxes o There are external forces that look over everyone in the world 3 sociologists o Derber People are constantly looking for attention Attention = Power o William James We have multiple selves We act according to our reputation The way people see us o George H. Mead “I” “real me” “Me” “social me” Interaction Identification “Acknowledge existence” we take the attitude of the other “significant other” Deviance 12/08/2010 Earliest theories: biological – deviants are born not made Power of publically recognized label Insider/outsider – language o Each social realm has its own language of inclusion/exclusion o Creates norms + deviance Deviance is relative to: o Social context o Historical period o Cui bono? – says who? What group? What interests? Deviance is a matter of social definition still powerful W.I. Thomas “a situation is not so much real in itself, but is real in its consequences” In every culture there are deviances, which: Give labels Create grief Interferes with society Is it destructive? There are punishments to deviants These are rituals that help fix and unify society Deviants: Are out of order Punish Help strengthen and unify society o Creates solidarity amongst the group Dominant groups in society unify and oppose deviants o This creates: solidarity + identity brings moral authority are independent of will have power against conspiracy not passive occur in all social orders Dysfunctional? o No o Depends on the group they affect Emile Durkheim: Founder of functionalism Talked about social facts, which are: o External o Coercive Power over individuals (institutions) social control: o external o gives power defines deviances internal functions of deviance: o Identity o Solidarity o Moral defense “society needs deviants” Rassaham Labels = power o Ruin life Deviance o Primary Do NOT embrace label o Secondary Embrace label In order to destroy deviance a ritual has to occur which unites society against the deviant Identification o Cultural Pluralism + Structural Pluralism All aspects of culture change: Rationality o Increase in rational control o Increase in individuality/independent thinking o Runs Institutions o Humans act a certain way Cultural pluralism o Multiplicity of cultures o Multi-culture = different thinking o Increase in religious diversity o Humans have different identities Structural pluralism o Private and public spheres are divided Structural pluralism + cultural pluralism + rationality = more understanding of culture Deinstitutionalization 12/08/2010 Language Humans are language animals Everything depends on language Trust ≠ reality, but humans trust language If we don’t trust language we have nothing left to believe Humans have no instincts Institutions Follow a coherent pattern Part of the background The foreground is increasing o Humans are becoming more individualistic o The power of institutions is declining Balance of societies Societies with very little foreground and a lot of background are totalitarian Extreme modern societies tend to have very little background and a lot of foreground Traditional societies are closer to totalitarian societies Background is what we take for granted, while the foreground is what we deliberately do Current modern societies are closer to the extreme modern societies than totalitarian societies Modern societies negate trust, they have developed more skepticism The main purpose of the crusades was to find certainty, but instead they found skepticism Nitchev 1st skeptic neonism = nothingness Trialectic Pluralism Juxtaposes cultures o Different ways in which we see words Undermines trust o Authority + confidence = words Media Affect human consciousness deeply o Molds the world and space Almost disappear o Compartmentalize world’s reality Blends together Significant + insignificant o Allusion of intimacy o Attention getting Words ≠ meaning There’s no source of authority Law and culture are inversely related Increase in laws = decrease in culture o Modern societies Decrease in laws = increase in culture our background influences’ defines who we are root = stable roots = unstable public sphere is constantly changing which affects the private sphere, which is in charge of integrating the roots coherently identity has been deinstitutionalized human thought is ascribed sexual identity o is being questioned foreground increasing Subjectivization shift inward permanent reflectiveness o human crisis increase in multiple thoughts “realization” identity is malleable solution? life plans if one wants liberation o it’s a double sided knife Marriage 12/08/2010 does true love exist? There are conditions Humans are free agents Intimate We have a fluid atmosphere Costs and benefits Babies Marriage is a pattern life’s course o 1st marriedchildpre-schoolteenlaunchingmiddle ageold age 0 2 4 6 8 10 Marriage Life Duration H ap in es s women that work outside of the house have a higher happiness level o husbands have a lower happiness level cohabitation o 2 people living together o doesn’t last long o either they marry or they breakup divorce? rare in the 1950’s o divorce rate has been increasing since then divorce rate is 45% now younger couples have higher divorce rates wealthy people have lower divorce rates usually having a child before marriage increases the changes of getting a divorce social class is a factor parents o children from divorced parents to have a 90% higher chance of getting a divorce than those whose parents stayed together consequences: o women tend to loose lower social mobility o kids from divorced parents have a higher % chance of dropping out of school and/or going to prison increase in foreground unstable institution decreased in power higher burden has been placed on it o economical expectations have been added to the equation the institutions that used to support marriage have decline in power o the church uses of marriage: friendship ≠ marriage survival = social + economic sexual outlet best friend + romance Furthest hand Locate human phenomenon Sacred canopy Life Brings structure into our married life protection repairs any deviant secularization = decrease in religion privatized o public = wars o domesticated pluratization o no monopoly on meaning o needs marketing o plausibility divided by structure doubt grows o preference deinstitutionalized o decrease in background = increase in foreground o heresy = to choose o crisis of credibility (C.C.) weakening humans experience marginality raises doubt in modernity o increase in C.C. Lipman Assets of modernity eroded capacity to believe but not to need Durkheim 4 elementary forms o clan o totem o sacredness o legends God = Symbol Secularism functionalism: until sacred value is imposed on the totem “sacred canopy” shelters/protects us USA is individualistic Religion is needed but it is absent Social Stratification 12/08/2010 Gender Ethnicity + Race Nationality Social differentiation Ranking of social positions Classifying human beings Location in hierarchy Ranking of: o life chances o gender o race +ethnicity o age Social inequality leads to conflict which leads to change Marx Key element was social class o Relationship of humans to the means of production Prolatarian o High class has control and ownership Economic power Gives access to resources The higher you are in the social stratification the more opportunities and resources are available to you o status = exclusivity o has the power of legitimate naming help us see other parts of the world money and job position defines our social ranking prediction high class strong sense of control defer gratification for greater reward more ambiguous see life grey instead of black and white higher political influence tend to be o Episcopalian o Congressionalist o Presbyterian o Lutheran o Methodist o Pentecostal o Fundamentalism Upper middle class: Secular Jews o Reform Conservative Orthodox o Modern o Old order Higher IQ’s Higher Education More job opportunities after universities Better health low class fatalism belief take immediate gratification lower health Romance Love stays within social order Marriage stability o Those that marry young tend to be in the lower parts of the social stratification Tend to follow traditional male/female roles o Those that marry later tend to be part of the high class Children The lower class tends to have more children o They teach their children to follow rules The upper class tends to have fewer children o They teach their children to follow principles (rearing) Men tend to die before women Changing in social stratification follows with all the characteristics of every class Classes are divided pluralistically amongst several groups: Each one of these groups has a specific division within o Economics o Race o Gender o Education o Sports Has 3 purposes Conflict o Durkheim o Derber o Marx Functionalism o Marx o Weber Symbolic interaction o Goffman o Derber o Mead Davis + Moore Uneven distribution Idea becomes theory Behavior Formal institutions Voting pattern Culture Implicit within system Nonpolitical foundations Cluster of ideas (implicit) Healthy democracy = healthy culture Ideas are stable “E Pluribus Unum” from many one pluribus = many = differences it’s a puzzle constantly being changed “UNUM” o thin consensus ideal common belief substance winning over rightness pluralism differences in religion, economic positions, ethnicity, etc. politicized Shared agreements ≠ deinstitutionalization Debates are based in deeply rooted problems Policy o Ex. Abortion Meaning: Motherhood Freedom Real meaning + purpose in America o Epistemic roots Persuasion/coercion Michel Foucault Good society Politics of language Deinstitutionalized Humans think functionally Symbolic frame Political Pluralism evolved Words contested o Reflects + shapes reality Not a political structure Presupposes culture Change in immigration laws Increase in diversity Transcend differences Culture = deinstitutionalized Plurality + fragmentation Mcintire Not logical but Agreement Rival premises o Come from illogical roots No universal common good Durkheim Laws = pressure Society = unity? o Solidarity Mechanical Traditional Solidarity of belief Organic Modern Interdependence Both of these 2 types of societies are have characteristics of each other Legitimization crisis It’s about the “unum” Built over time Government depends on agreement before it can rule Laws are inversely related to culture o State ≠ democracy Stable Has unstable cultural roots