Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Kentucky River Case: Supervisory Status and Independent Judgment under NLRA, Slides of Labour Law

The kentucky river case, which revolves around the interpretation of the term 'supervisor' under the national labor relations act (nlra). The case involved six employees who were determined by the national labor relations board (nlrb) not to be supervisors, as they only exercised independent judgment based on their expertise and technical training. However, the court overturned the nlrb's decision, stating that the source of the employee's judgment is irrelevant and that the amount of judgment is the determining factor for supervisory status. The document also covers the burden of proof regarding supervisory status and the judicial review issue.

Typology: Slides

2012/2013

Uploaded on 01/26/2013

saidullah
saidullah 🇮🇳

4.7

(7)

40 documents

1 / 10

Toggle sidebar

Related documents


Partial preview of the text

Download Kentucky River Case: Supervisory Status and Independent Judgment under NLRA and more Slides Labour Law in PDF only on Docsity! Kentucky River – Relevant Statutory Provisions • Sec. 2(3) The term “employee” . . . shall not include. . . any individual employed as a supervisor, . . ... • Sec. 2 (11). The term supervisor means any individual having authority, in the interest of the employer, to hire, transfer, suspend, lay off, recall, promote, discharge, assign, reward, or discipline other employees, or responsibly to direct them, or to adjust their grievances, or effectively to recommend such action, if in connection with the foregoing the exercise of such authority is not of a merely routine or clerical nature, but requires the use of independent judgment (emphases added). Docsity.com Health Care and Retirement Corp. (Earlier Case) • Broad definition of “supervisors” – use of term “or” in the listing – “in the interest of” means furthering the employer’s interests Docsity.com Kentucky River (cont.) • Two Issues – Issue 2 (cont.) – independent judgment” ambiguous terminology with respect to amount of judgment – “independent judgment” not ambiguous terminology with respect to source of judgment – Board may exercise discretion regarding amount of, but not source of, independent judgment – Board’s finding in Kentucky River that RN’s are not supervisors (within the meaning of NLRA) because their independent judgment to responsibly direct employees based on their expertise and technical training, and not from management’s delegation of authority must be overturned • “responsibly direct” function cannot be treated differently than the other 11 functions Docsity.com Kentucky River (cont.) – Source of employee judgment (professional expertise or employer’s authority) an irrelevant consideration, Board may look only at amount of judgment to determine “independence” • Sec. 2(11) creates no distinction between sources • If direction is provided through independent judgment, ee a supervisor and not covered. • RN’s exercise independent judgment and are therefore excluded Docsity.com Judicial Review Issue • Courts may not directly review unit determination decision by Board – Review can be obtained only by a refusal to bargain Docsity.com
Docsity logo



Copyright © 2024 Ladybird Srl - Via Leonardo da Vinci 16, 10126, Torino, Italy - VAT 10816460017 - All rights reserved