Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

LAWS4103 Contract, Lecture notes of Law

An extract from a course on contract law. It covers topics such as formation of contracts, formalities, estoppel, terms of a contract, termination, remedies, misrepresentation, misleading and deceptive conduct. definitions, examples, and case law to illustrate the concepts. It also discusses equitable estoppel and its application in different scenarios. a useful resource for law students studying contract law.

Typology: Lecture notes

2022/2023

Uploaded on 03/14/2023

kavinsky
kavinsky 🇺🇸

4.4

(22)

37 documents

Partial preview of the text

Download LAWS4103 Contract and more Lecture notes Law in PDF only on Docsity! LAWS 4103 Contract SAMPLE EXTRACT LAWS4103 Contract CONTENTS Formation of Contracts Page 3 Formalities Page 12 Estoppel Page 13 Terms of a Contract Page 16 Implied Terms Page 26 Termination Page 30 Remedies Page 36 Misrepresentation, Misleading & Deceptive Conduct Page 39 LAWS4103 Contract • Prospective detriment = where a party threatens to depart from an assumption, question if that departure would/will cause detriment. • A conjectural/speculative possibility of detriment is not sufficient. ➢ Reasonableness. • Concerned with whether relying party is deserving of protection. o Whether relying party acted reasonably in adopting assumption. o Whether relying party acted reasonably in taking detrimental action. ➢ Unconscionable Conduct. • Concerned with whether the representor is deserving of blame. • Representor’s knowledge of assumption/intention to induce reliance relevant. • Commonwealth v Verwayen (1990) 170 CLR 394 –Deane J: unconscionable conduct must be determined in context of reasonableness of relying party to adopt assumption & take detrimental action on that assumption. ➢ Departure or Threatened Departure. • Estoppel cannot arise until departure/threatened departure from an assumption relied upon. • Some argue estoppel comes into effect once assumption induced & reasonably relied upon. Estoppel & Contract ➢ Formation – equitable estoppel may arise if offeror leads offeree to believe that offer will not be revoked & offeree acts to their detriment in reliance of that assumption. ➢ Privity – a person not party to a contract but who has been led to believe that they are a party to, or will receive a benefit under, a contract may be able to establish an estoppel if they have acted in detrimental reliance (Trident General Insurance v McNiece Bros (1988) 165 CLR 107). ➢ Formalities – where a party has acted to their detriment on the faith of an expectation that a written contract will come into existence, that party may be able to obtain relief through equitable estoppel. LAWS4103 Contract Misrepresentation/Misleading/Deceptive Conduct Misrepresentation (Common Law) ❖ Fraudulent (rescission, damages available). ❖ Negligent (rescission, damages available). ❖ Innocent (rescission, no damages). ❖ Must be separate from contract. ❖ Must be actionable. ❖ Must be a statement of fact. ➢ Not a statement of law. ➢ Not a statement of intention (Edington v Fitzmaurice). ➢ Not a statement about the future (Balfour v Hollandia Ravensthorpe). ➢ Not a statement of opinion (Bisset v Wilkinson; Smith v Land & House Property). ❖ Silence. ➢ Needs to be positive misrepresentation. ➢ Half-truth (rent payed but not that represented; Awaroa Holdings v Commercial Securities). ➢ Change in circumstances (With v O’Flanagan; Jones v Dumbrell). ❖ Reliance. ➢ Must be reliance on representation (Holmes v Jones). ➢ No obligation to check truth (Redgrave v Hurd). ➢ Need not be sole reliance (Edgington v Fitzmaurice). ➢ Gould v Vaggelas – representee has onus of proof of reliance, representor may have evidentiary onus to contrary, inducement inferred from facts where statement calculated to induce followed by entry into contract. ❖ Rescission. ➢ Only contractual remedy open to a representee. ➢ Act & choice of the party (need clear words or conduct). ➢ Contract is said to be voidable (parties restored to pre-contract conditions). ➢ Car & Universal Finance v Caldwell – communication unnecessary where representation is fraudulent. ➢ If contract rescinded for misrepresentation, then all consideration & promise returned (termination would mean accrued rights/obligations do not need to be returned). ➢ Bars to rescission. o Impossibility of restitution (Alati v Kruger – must be able to substantially return). o Affirmation by election or imputation (Coastal Estates v Melevende – must have known a right to rescind, but only applies to fraudulent misrepresentation). ❖ Damages. ➢ Causation of misrepresentation. ➢ To put plaintiff in position before there was any reliance on the representation.
Docsity logo



Copyright © 2024 Ladybird Srl - Via Leonardo da Vinci 16, 10126, Torino, Italy - VAT 10816460017 - All rights reserved