Learning activity sheet of Practical research 1, Exercises of English

Download Learning activity sheet of Practical research 1 and more Exercises English in PDF only on Docsity! One An Introduction to Codes and Coding Any researcher who wishes to become proficient at doing qualitative analysis must learn to code well and easily.The excellence of the research rests in large part on the excellence of the coding. (Anselm L. Strauss, Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists, 1987, p. 27) Purposes of the Manual The three primary purposes of The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers are: • to briefly discuss the functions of codes, coding, and analytic memo writ- ing during the qualitative data collection and analytic processes • to profile a selected yet diverse repertoire of coding methods generally applied in qualitative data analysis, and • to provide readers sources, descriptions, examples, recommended applica- tions, and exercises for coding and further analyzing qualitative data. This manual does not address such matters as qualitative research design or how to conduct interviews or participant observation fieldwork. These topics are already masterfully discussed in other textbooks. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers is intended as a reference to supplement those existing works.This manual focuses exclusively on codes and coding and how they play a role in the qualitative data analytic process. For newcomers to qualitative inquiry it presents a repertoire of coding methods in broad brushstrokes. Additional information and extended discussion of the methods can be found in most of the cited sources. Grounded theory (discussed in Chapter Two), for example, is elegantly profiled, streamlined, and re-envisioned in Kathy Charmaz’s (2006) Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis; while Graham R. Gibbs’ (2007) Analyzing Qualitative Data provides an elegant survey of basic analytic processes. Saldana-3784-Ch-01:Saldana-3784-Ch-01.qxp 9/26/2008 7:10 PM Page 1 The Coding Manual does not maintain allegiance to any one specific research genre or methodology.Throughout this book you’ll read a breadth of perspectives on codes and coding, sometimes purposely juxtaposed to illustrate and highlight the diverse opinions among scholars in the field. No one, including myself, can claim final authority on the “best” way to code qualitative data. In fact, there are a few instances where I take moderate lib- erty with adapting and even renaming prescribed coding methods for clarity or flexibility’s sake. This is not intended to standardize terminology within the field, but simply to employ consistency throughout this particular man- ual. My perspective acknowledges and promotes the pragmatist paradigm (Patton, 2002), which chooses “the right tool for the right job” since all research questions, methodologies, conceptual frameworks, and fieldwork parameters are context-specific. I also wrote this manual because I find it problematic (but not difficult) to teach coding in my own qualitative research methods course. I provide students with an array of readings about the process from multiple sources because I have yet to find that single satisfactory book (to me) that focuses exclusively on the topic. General introductory texts in qualitative inquiry are so numerous and well-written that it becomes difficult not to find the best one to use, but which one of such quality works to select as the primary textbook.This man- ual supplements introductory works in the subject because most limit their dis- cussions about coding to the writer’s prescribed, preferred, or signature methods. I wanted to provide in a single resource a selected collection of var- ious coding methods developed by other researchers (and myself) that provides students and colleagues a handy reference for classroom exercises and assign- ments, and for their own independent research for thesis and dissertation field- work and future qualitative studies. But by no means is it an exhaustive resource. I deliberately exclude such discipline-specific methods as Behavior Coding (which notes problematic respondent and interviewer behaviors dur- ing survey interviews [Singleton & Straits, 2002, p. 65]) and such signature methods as the Davis Observation Code system (for medical interviews [Zoppi & Epstein, 2002, p. 375]). If you need additional information and explanation about the coding methods, check the References. The Coding Manual is intended primarily as a reference work. It is not nec- essarily meant to be read cover-to-cover, but it certainly can be if you wish to acquaint yourself with all 29 coding methods profiles and their analytic possi- bilities. There are, in fact, several principles related to coding matters not dis- cussed in the first two chapters that are unique to some of the profiles. If you choose to review all the contents, read selected sections at a time,not all of them in one sitting, otherwise it can overwhelm you. If you’re scanning the manual to see which coding method(s) might be appropriate for your particular study, THE CODING MANUAL FOR QUALITATIVE RESEARCHERS2 Saldana-3784-Ch-01:Saldana-3784-Ch-01.qxp 9/26/2008 7:10 PM Page 2 Coding for patterns In the examples presented thus far, each unit of data was assigned its own unique code.This is due primarily to the short length of the excerpts. In larger and complete data sets, you will find that several to many of the same codes will be used repeatedly throughout.This is both natural and deliberate – nat- ural because there are mostly repetitive patterns of action and consistencies in human affairs, and deliberate because one of the coder’s primary goals is to find these repetitive patterns of action and consistencies in human affairs as docu- mented in the data. In the example below, note how the same Process Code (a word or phrase which captures action) is used twice during this small unit of elementary school classroom activity: 1 Mrs. Jackson rises from her desk and 1 LINING UP FOR LUNCH announces,“OK, you guys, let’s get lined up for lunch. Row One.” Five children seated in the first row of desks rise and walk to the classroom door. Some of the seated children talk to each other. 2 Mrs. Jackson looks at them and says, 2 MANAGING BEHAVIOR “No talking, save it for the cafeteria. 3 Row Two.” Five children seated in the 3 LINING UP FOR LUNCH second row of desks rise and walk to the children already standing in line. Another way the above passage could be coded is to acknowledge that MAN- AGING BEHAVIOR is not a separate action or an interruption of the rou- tine that disrupts the flow of LINING UP FOR LUNCH,but to interpret that MANAGING BEHAVIOR is an embedded or interconnected part of the larger social scheme that composes LINING UP FOR LUNCH.The coding might appear thusly, using a method called Simultaneous Coding (which applies two or more codes within a single datum): 1 Mrs. Jackson rises from her desk and 1 LINING UP FOR LUNCH announces,“OK, you guys, let’s get lined up for lunch. Row One.” Five children seated in the first row of desks rise and walk to the classroom door. Some of the seated children talk to each other. 1a Mrs. Jackson looks at them and says, 1a MANAGING “No talking, save it for the cafeteria. 1 Row Two.” Five children seated in the second BEHAVIOR row of desks rise and walk to the children already standing in line. Take note of some important caveats when it comes to understanding pat- terns and regularity: idiosyncrasy is a pattern (Saldaña, 2003, pp. 118–22) and AN INTRODUCTION TO CODES AND CODING 5 Saldana-3784-Ch-01:Saldana-3784-Ch-01.qxp 9/26/2008 7:10 PM Page 5 there can be patterned variation in data (Agar, 1996, p. 10). Sometimes we code and categorize data by what participants talk about.They may all share with you their personal perceptions of school experiences, for example, but their individual value, attitude, and belief systems about education may vary greatly from being bored and disengaged to being enthusiastic and intrinsi- cally motivated. When you search for patterns in coded data to categorize them, understand that sometimes you may group things together not just because they are exactly alike or very much alike, but because they might also have something in common – even if, paradoxically, that commonality con- sists of differences. For example, each one of us may have a strong opinion about who should be leading our country.The fact that we each have an individual opinion about that issue is what we have in common.As for whom we each believe should be leading the country, that’s where the differences and variations occur. Acknowledge that a confounding property of category construction in quali- tative inquiry is that data within them cannot always be precisely and discretely bounded; they are within “fuzzy” boundaries at best (Tesch, 1990, pp. 135–8). That’s why a method called Simultaneous Coding is an option we have, when needed. Finally, Hatch (2002) offers that you think of patterns not just as sta- ble regularities but as varying forms.A pattern can be characterized by: • similarity (things happen the same way) • difference (they happen in predictably different ways) • frequency (they happen often or seldom) • sequence (they happen in a certain order) • correspondence (they happen in relation to other activities or events) • causation (one appears to cause another) (p. 155) Coding filters The act of coding requires that you wear your researcher’s analytic lens. But how you perceive and interpret what is happening in the data depends on what type of filter covers that lens. For example, consider the following state- ment from an older male: “There’s just no place in this country for illegal immigrants. Round them up and send those criminals back to where they came from.” One researcher, a grounded theorist using In Vivo Coding to keep the data rooted in the participant’s own language,might code the datum this way: 1 There’s just no place in this country for illegal 1 “NO PLACE” immigrants. Round them up and send those criminals back to where they came from. THE CODING MANUAL FOR QUALITATIVE RESEARCHERS6 Saldana-3784-Ch-01:Saldana-3784-Ch-01.qxp 9/26/2008 7:10 PM Page 6 A second researcher, an urban ethnographer employing Descriptive Coding to document and categorize the breadth of opinions stated by multiple partici- pants, might code the same datum this way: 1 There’s just no place in this country for illegal 1 IMMIGRATION ISSUES immigrants. Round them up and send those criminals back to where they came from. And a third researcher, a critical race theorist employingValues Coding to cap- ture and label subjective perspectives,may code the exact same datum this way: 1 There’s just no place in this country for illegal 1 XENOPHOBIA immigrants. Round them up and send those criminals back to where they came from. The collection of coding methods in this manual is a repertoire of possible filters to consider and apply to your approaches to qualitative inquiry. But even before that, your level of personal involvement as a participant observer – as a peripheral, active, or complete member during fieldwork – filters how you per- ceive, document, and thus code your data (Adler & Adler, 1987). So do the types of questions you ask and the types of responses you receive during interviews (Kvale, 1996; Rubin & Rubin, 1995), the detail and structuring of your field notes (Emerson,Fretz,& Shaw,1995), the gender and race/ethnicity of your par- ticipants – and yourself (Behar & Gordon, 1995; Stanfield & Dennis, 1993), and whether you collect data from adults or children (Greene & Hogan, 2005; Zwiers & Morrissette, 1999). Merriam (1998) states,“our analysis and interpretation – our study’s findings – will reflect the constructs, concepts, language,models, and theories that structured the study in the first place” (p. 48).And it is not only your approach to qualita- tive inquiry (e.g., case study, ethnographic, phenomenological) and ontological, epistemological, and methodological issues that influence and affect your cod- ing decisions (Creswell, 2007; Mason, 2002). Sipe and Ghiso (2004), in their revealing narrative about coding dilemmas for a children’s literacy study, note that “All coding is a judgment call” since we bring “our subjectivities, our per- sonalities, our predispositions, [and] our quirks” to the process (pp. 482–3). Coding as a heuristic The majority of qualitative researchers will code their data both during and after collection as an analytic tactic, for coding is analysis (Miles & Huberman, 1994, p. 56). Differing perspectives, however, attest that “Coding and analysis are not synonymous, though coding is a crucial aspect of analysis” (Basit, 2003,p.145). AN INTRODUCTION TO CODES AND CODING 7 Saldana-3784-Ch-01:Saldana-3784-Ch-01.qxp 9/26/2008 7:10 PM Page 7 Emergent categories might also evolve as conceptual processes rather than descriptive topics such as: Inequity: Participants perceive unfair treatment directed toward themselves and favoritism directed toward others: “I’ve been working here for over 25 years and some newcomers are making higher salaries than me.” The categories’ propositional statements are then compared with each other to discern possible relationships to create an outcome proposition based on their combination. Recoding and recategorizing Rarely will anyone get coding right the first time.Qualitative inquiry demands meticulous attention to language and deep reflection on the emergent patterns and meanings of human experience. Recoding can occur with a more attuned perspective using First Cycle methods again, while Second Cycle methods describe those processes that might be employed during the second (and third and possibly fourth … review of data. As you code and recode, expect – or rather, strive for – your codes and cat- egories to become more refined. Some of your First Cycle codes may be later subsumed by other codes, relabeled, or dropped all together. As you progress toward Second Cycle coding, there may be some rearrangement and reclassi- fication of coded data into different and even new categories. Abbott (2004) cleverly likens the process to “decorating a room; you try it, step back, move a few things, step back again, try a serious reorganization, and so on” (p. 215). For example, I observed and interviewed fourth and fifth grade children to learn the ways they hurt and oppress each other (Saldaña, 2005b). This was preparatory fieldwork before an action research project that attempted to empower children with strategies, learned through improvised dramatic simu- lations and role-playing, for dealing with bullying in the school environment. I initially categorized their responses into Physical and Verbal forms of oppression. Some of the codes that fell under these categories were: Category: Physical Oppression Code: PUSHING Code: FIGHTING Code: SCRATCHING Category: Verbal Oppression Code: NAME-CALLING Code: THREATENING Code: LAUGHING AT As coding continued, I observed that a few oppressions were a combination of both physical and verbal actions. For example, a child can EXCLUDE others THE CODING MANUAL FOR QUALITATIVE RESEARCHERS10 Saldana-3784-Ch-01:Saldana-3784-Ch-01.qxp 9/26/2008 7:10 PM Page 10 physically from a game, accompanied with a verbal statement such as, “You can’t play with us.” Hence, a third major category emerged: Physical and Verbal Oppression. As the study continued, more data were collected through other methods, and gender differences in children’s perceptions and enactment of oppression became strikingly apparent.To participants, oppression was not about the body and voice; it was about “force” and “feelings.”The three initial categories were eventually reduced to two, and renamed based on what seemed to resonate with gender-based observations.The new categories and a few sample codes and rearranged subcodes included: Category: Oppression through Physical Force (primarily but not exclusively by boys) Code: FIGHTING Subcode: SCRATCHING Subcode: PUSHING Subcode: PUNCHING Category: Oppression through Hurting Others’ Feelings (primarily but not exclu- sively by girls) Code: PUTTING DOWN Subcode: NAME-CALLING Subcode: TEASING Subcode: TRASH TALKING See the Domain andTaxonomic Coding profile in ChapterThree for an extended discussion of this case, and the Initial and Focused Coding examples in Chapters Three and Four respectively to see how a series of codes gets categorized. From codes and categories to theory Some categories may contain clusters of coded data that merit further refinement into subcategories.And when the major categories are compared with each other and consolidated in various ways, you begin to transcend the “reality” of your data and progress toward the thematic, conceptual, and theoretical. As a very basic process, codifying usually follows an ideal and streamlined scheme illustrated in Figure 1.1.Keep in mind that the actual act of reaching theory is much more com- plex and messy than illustrated.Richards & Morse (2007) clarify that “categorizing is how we get ‘up’ from the diversity of data to the shapes of the data, the sorts of things represented.Concepts are how we get up to more general, higher-level, and more abstract constructs” (p.157).Our ability to show how these themes and con- cepts systematically interrelate lead toward the development of theory (Corbin & Strauss, 2008,p. 55), though Layder (1998) contends that pre-established sociolog- ical theories can inform, if not drive, the initial coding process itself.The develop- ment of an original theory is not always a necessary outcome for qualitative AN INTRODUCTION TO CODES AND CODING 11 Saldana-3784-Ch-01:Saldana-3784-Ch-01.qxp 9/26/2008 7:10 PM Page 11 inquiry, but acknowledge that preexisting theories drive the entire research enterprise, whether you are aware of them or not (Mason, 2002). In the example above of children’s forms of oppression, there were two major categories that emerged from the study: Oppression through Physical Force, and Oppression through Hurting Others’ Feelings. So, what major themes or concepts can be developed from these categories? An obvious theme we noticed was that, in later childhood, peer oppression is gen- dered. One higher-level concept we constructed – an attempt to progress from the real to the abstract – was child stigma, based on the observation that chil- dren frequently label those who are perceived different in various ways “weird,” and thus resort to oppressive actions (Goffman, 1963).We could not, in confidence, formulate a formal theory from this study due to the limited amount of fieldwork time in the classrooms. But a key assertion (Erickson, 1986) we did develop and put forth, based on the contexts of this study, was: To artist and activist Augusto Boal, adult participation in theatre for social change is “rehearsal for the revolution.” With ages 9–11 children, however, their participation in theatre for social change seems more like an “audition” for preadolescent social interaction. The key assertion of this study is: Theatre for social change overtly reveals the interpersonal social systems and power hierarchies within an elementary school classroom microculture, THE CODING MANUAL FOR QUALITATIVE RESEARCHERS12 Real Abstract Code Code Category Category Code Themes/ Concepts Theory Subcategory Subcategory Particular General Code Code Code FIGURE 1.1 A streamlined codes-to-theory model for qualitative inquiry Saldana-3784-Ch-01:Saldana-3784-Ch-01.qxp 9/26/2008 7:10 PM Page 12 Second Cycle coding methods (see Chapter Four). But note that some question qualitative research’s ability to assert causality: “the understanding of human experience is a matter of chronologies more than of causes and effects” (Stake, 1995, p. 39). Amounts of data to code One related issue with which qualitative research methodologists disagree is the amount of the data corpus – the total body of data – that should be coded. Some (e.g., Lofland et al., 2006; Strauss, 1987; cf.Wolcott, 1999) feel that every recorded fieldwork detail is worthy of consideration, for it is from the pat- terned minutiae of daily life that we might generate significant social insight. Others (e.g., Seidman, 2006), if not most, feel that only the most salient por- tions of the corpus merit examination, and that even up to one half of the total record can be summarized or deleted, leaving the primary half for intensive data analysis. The danger is that the portions deleted might contain the as yet unknown units of data that could pull everything together, or include the nega- tive case that motivates a rethinking of a code, category, theme, concept, theory, or assertion. Postmodern perspectives on ethnographic texts consider all docu- mentation and reports partial and incomplete anyway, so the argument for main- taining and coding a full or reduced data corpus seems moot. Amount notwithstanding, insure that you have not just sufficient qualitative but sufficient quality data with which to work that have been appropriately transcribed and formatted (see Poland, 2002). I have learned from years of qualitative data analysis that, only with experi- ence, I now feel more secure knowing and feeling what is important in the data record and what is not, and thus code what rises to the surface – “relevant text” as Auerbach & Silverstein (2003) label it.The beginning of my fieldwork career, however, was a major learning curve for me, and I coded anything and everything that was collected. I advise the same for novices to qualitative research.You, too, will eventually discover from experience what matters and what doesn’t in the data corpus. (Of course, there will always be brief passages of minor or trivial consequence scattered throughout interviews and field notes. Code these N/A – not applicable.) So, what gets coded? Slices of social life recorded in the data – participant activities, perceptions, and the tangible documents and artifacts produced by them.Your own reflective data in the form of analytic memos (discussed in ChapterTwo) and observer’s comments in field notes are also substantive mate- rial for coding.The process does not have to be approached as if it were some elusive mystery or detective story with deeply hidden clues and misleading red herrings scattered throughout. If “human actions are based upon, or infused by, social meanings: that is, by intentions, motives, beliefs, rules, and values” AN INTRODUCTION TO CODES AND CODING 15 Saldana-3784-Ch-01:Saldana-3784-Ch-01.qxp 9/26/2008 7:10 PM Page 15 (Hammersley & Atkinson, 1995, p. 7), then why not just code these actions and social meanings directly (assuming they are represented in your data and your inferential skills are working at an optimum)?The entire process and products of creating data about the data in the form of codes, analytic memos, and graph- ical summaries are “metadata activities” (MacQueen & Guest, 2008, p. 14). The Mechanics of Coding As you prepare text-based qualitative data for manual (i.e., paper and pencil) coding and analyzing, lay out printed interview transcripts, field notes, and other researcher-generated materials in double-spaced format on the left half or left two-thirds of the page, keeping a wide right-hand margin for writing codes and notes. Rather than keeping your data running together as long unbroken passages, separate the text into short paragraph-length units with a line break in-between them whenever the topic or subtopic appears to change (as best as you can, because in real life “social interaction does not occur in neat, isolated units” [Glesne, 2006, p. 150]). Gee,Michaels, & O’Connor (1992) call these unit breaks and their rearrangement into poetic-like verses for dis- course analysis “stanzas” of text, and emphasize that “formatting choices are a part of the analysis and may reveal or conceal aspects of meaning and intent” (p. 240). Unit divisions will also play a key role in formatting data for CAQDAS – Computer Assisted Qualitative Data Analysis Software – programs (discussed later). Pre-coding In addition to coding with words and short phrases, never overlook the opportunity to “pre-code” (Layder, 1998) by circling, highlighting, bolding, underlining, or coloring rich or significant participant quotes or passages that strike you – those “codable moments” worthy of attention (Boyatzis, 1998). Creswell (2007, pp. 168–9) recommends that such quotes found in data contained in a CAQDAS program file can be simultaneously coded as QUOTES with their other codes to enable later retrieval. Selected programs have areas dedicated to storing intriguing quotations for later access. These data can become key pieces of the evidentiary warrant to support your propositions, assertions, or theory (Booth, Colomb, & Williams, 2003; Erickson, 1986; Lofland et al., 2006), and serve as illustrative examples throughout your report.The codes or quotes may even be so provocative that they become part of the title, organizational framework, or through-line of the report. For example, in my study of theatre of the oppressed (i.e., theatre for social change) with elementary school children, I was puzzled why young THE CODING MANUAL FOR QUALITATIVE RESEARCHERS16 Saldana-3784-Ch-01:Saldana-3784-Ch-01.qxp 9/26/2008 7:10 PM Page 16 people continually employed combative tactics during improvisational dramatic simulations to resolve imbalanced power issues, when I was trying to teach them proactive peace-building efforts. A fourth-grade girl poignantly pro- vided the answer when we discussed my concerns by explaining to me, “Sometimes, you can’t be nice to deal with oppression” (Saldaña, 2005b, p. 117). The quote was so powerful that it began my final research report as a datum that would both capture the reader’s interest and later explain the through- line of the study. Preliminary jottings Start coding as you collect and format your data, not after all fieldwork has been completed. When you’re writing up field notes, transcribing recorded interviews, or filing documents you gathered from the site, jot down any pre- liminary words or phrases for codes on the notes, transcripts, or documents themselves, or as an analytic memo or entry in a research journal for future ref- erence. They don’t have to be accurate or final at this point, just ideas for ana- lytic consideration while the study progresses. Be wary of relying on your memory for future writing. Get your thoughts, however fleeting, documented in some way. Also make certain that these code jottings are distinct in some way from the body of data – bracketed, capitalized, italicized, bolded, etc. Liamputtong & Ezzy (2005, pp. 270–3) recommend formatting pages of data into three columns rather than two.The first and widest column contains the data them- selves – interview transcripts, field notes, etc. The second column contains space for preliminary code notes and jottings, while the third column lists the final codes. The second column’s ruminations or first impressions may help provide a transitional link between the raw data and codes: COLUMN 1 COLUMN 2 COLUMN 3 Raw Data Preliminary Codes Final Code 1 The closer I get to “retirement age” 1 RETIREMENT ANXIETY retirement age, the faster I want it to happen. I’m not even 55 yet and I would financial obligations give anything to retire now. But there’s a mortgage to pay off and still a lot more to sock away in savings before I can even think of it. I keep playing the lottery, though, in hopes of dreams of early winning those millions. No retirement luck yet. AN INTRODUCTION TO CODES AND CODING 17 Saldana-3784-Ch-01:Saldana-3784-Ch-01.qxp 9/26/2008 7:10 PM Page 17 I’m not telling you this to depress you or scare you but it was a 1 reality 1 “REALITY” for me. 2 I thought I was so ready 2 “I THOUGHT IWAS SO READY” for this population because I had taught other groups of kids. But this is such a 3 unique situation, the 3 “UNIQUE SITUATION” inner city school. No, I should take that back: It’s not as much of a unique situation anymore. There are more and more schools that are turning into 4 inner 4 “INNER CITY SCHOOLS” city schools … 5 I really had to learn 5 “I REALLY HAD TO LEARN” about the kids. I had to learn about 6 the culture, I had to learn the language, 6 “THE CULTURE” I had to learn the gang signals, I had to learn what music was allowed, what t-shirts they could wear on certain days and not on other days. There was just 7 a lot to learn that I had never even 7 “A LOT TO LEARN” thought about. Now this 145-word excerpt is represented with seven codes rather than one. I state the numbers not to suggest that more is better or that less is more, but to highlight that lumping is an expedient coding method (with future detailed subcoding still possible),while splitting generates a more nuanced analysis from the start. Each approach has its advantages and disadvantages aside from the obvious factors of time and mental energy required. Lumping gets to the essence of categorizing a phenomenon while splitting encourages careful scrutiny of social action represented in the data. But lumping may lead to a superficial analysis if the coder does not employ conceptual words and phrases, while fine-grained splitting of data may overwhelm the analyst when it comes time to categorize the codes.During Second Cycle coding, you might collapse the original number of First Cycle codes into a smaller number as you reana- lyze the data and find that larger segments of text are better suited to just one key code rather than several smaller ones. It is only from experience that you’ll discover which approach works best for you, your particular study, and your particular research goals. The quantities of qualities Lichtman (2006) projects that most qualitative research studies in education will generate 80–100 codes that will be organized into 15–20 categories which even- tually synthesize into five to seven major concepts (pp. 164–5). Creswell (2007) begins his analyses with a short-list of five to six Provisional Codes to begin the process of “lean coding.”This expands to no more than 25–30 categories that then combine into five to six major themes (p. 152). Other disciplines and varying approaches to qualitative inquiry may prescribe different sets of numbers THE CODING MANUAL FOR QUALITATIVE RESEARCHERS20 Saldana-3784-Ch-01:Saldana-3784-Ch-01.qxp 9/26/2008 7:10 PM Page 20 as general guidelines for analysis.The final number of major themes or concepts should be held to a minimum to keep the analysis coherent, but there is no stan- dardized or magic number to achieve. Unlike Lichtman’s five to seven central concepts and Creswell’s five to six major themes, anthropologist Harry F.Wolcott (1994, p. 10) generally advises throughout his writings that three of anything major seems an elegant quantity for reporting qualitative work. The codebook or code list Since the number of codes can accumulate quite quickly and change as analy- sis progresses, keep a record of your emergent codes in a separate file as a code- book – a compilation of the codes, their content descriptions, and a brief data example for reference. CAQDAS programs, by default, will maintain a list of codes you have created for the project and provide space to define them.This can be reviewed periodically – both on the monitor screen and on hard copy – as coding progresses to assess its current contents and possible evolution. Maintaining this list provides an analytic opportunity to organize and reorga- nize the codes into major categories and subcategories.This management tech- nique also provides a comparative list if you are working with multiple participants and sites. One school site’s data, for example, may generate a list of codes significantly different from another school site. Codebooks or CAQDAS code lists become especially critical as a set of cod- ing standards when multiple team members work together on the same pro- ject’s data. MacQueen et al. (2008) strongly recommend that each codebook entry should contain “the code, a brief definition, a full definition, guidelines for when to use the code, guidelines for when not to use the code, and exam- ples” (p. 121).Also note that a codebook differs from an index, the latter being a coded composite of the data corpus, organized alphabetically, hierarchically, chronologically, categorically, etc. CAQDAS programs are superior for index- ing functions with a qualitative data corpus. Manual and CAQDAS Coding Some instructors of statistics and quantitative data analysis require that their students first learn how to “crunch the numbers” manually using only a pocket/hand calculator to provide them with cognitive understanding and ownership of the formulas and results. Once a statistical test has been adminis- tered this way, they can then use computers with software specifically designed to calculate numeric data. Coding and qualitative data analysis have their equivalent trial. I am one of those instructors who require that my students first perform “manual” coding and qualitative data analysis using paper and pencil on hard copies of data AN INTRODUCTION TO CODES AND CODING 21 Saldana-3784-Ch-01:Saldana-3784-Ch-01.qxp 9/26/2008 7:10 PM Page 21 entered and formatted with basic word-processing software only.The reason is that each class assignment of data gathering is relatively small-scale and thus a manageable project to analyze in this manner. But if a student’s dissertation pro- ject or my own independent research studies will require multiple participant interviews or extended fieldwork and extensive field note-taking, then CAQ- DAS becomes a vital and indispensable tool for the enterprise. Basit (2003) compared personal experiences between manual and electronic coding and concluded,“the choice will be dependent on the size of the project, the funds and time available, and the inclination and expertise of the researcher” (p. 143). Coding manually Trying to learn the basics of coding and qualitative data analysis simultane- ously with the sometimes complex instructions and multiple functions of CAQDAS programs can be overwhelming for some, if not most.Your mental energies may be more focused on the software than the data. I recommend that for first-time or small-scale studies, code on hard-copy printouts first, not via a computer monitor (cf. Bazeley, 2007, p. 92).There is something about manipulating qualitative data on paper and writing codes in pencil that give you more control over and ownership of the work. Perhaps this advice stems from my admitted lack of technological expertise and old-fashioned ways of working that have become part of my “codus” operandi. Nevertheless, there is something to be said for a large area of desk or table space with multiple pages or strips of paper spread out to see the smaller pieces of the larger puzzle – a literal perspective not always possible on a computer’s monitor screen. After you feel the codes are fairly well set from your initial hard-copy work, then transfer your codes onto the electronic file. But first, “Touch the data.…Handling the data gets additional data out of memory and into the record. It turns abstract information into concrete data” (Graue & Walsh, 1998, p. 145). Even proponents of CAQDAS recommend that hard-copy printouts of code lists and coded data be generated occasionally to permit you to work with tra- ditional writing materials such as red pens and highlighters to explore data in fresh ways. Coding electronically After you have gained some experience with hard-copy coding and have developed a basic understanding of the fundamentals of qualitative data analy- sis, apply that experiential knowledge base by working with CAQDAS. Keep in mind that CAQDAS itself does not actually code the data for you; that task is still the responsibility of the researcher.The software efficiently stores, orga- nizes, manages, and reconfigures your data to enable human analytic reflection. THE CODING MANUAL FOR QUALITATIVE RESEARCHERS22 Saldana-3784-Ch-01:Saldana-3784-Ch-01.qxp 9/26/2008 7:10 PM Page 22 AN INTRODUCTION TO CODES AND CODING 25 FIGURE 1.3 A Code Manager screenshot excerpt from ATLAS.ti, v.5.2 (courtesy of ATLAS.ti) Saldana-3784-Ch-01:Saldana-3784-Ch-01.qxp 9/26/2008 7:10 PM Page 25 programs, which can alleviate some of the repetitiveness of manually coding similar passages of text. Passages have to be formatted in prescribed ways and contain the exact same word or phrase, however, for this function to work accurately. The ATLAS.ti handbook strongly recommends a manual review after auto coding has been performed to verify the software’s coding assign- ments, and Lewins & Silver (2007) suggest that researchers should not feel “compelled to make use of auto coding just because it is available” (p. 21). Searches and queries with CAQDAS Another one of CAQDAS’s advantages over manual paper-and-pencil coding and analysis is its search and querying abilities to quickly collect and display key words and phrases and similarly-coded data for examination. Searches or queries of coded passages can even find where particular codes co-occur, over- lap, appear in a sequence, or lie in proximity to each other.These search func- tions can perform such actions as retrieve, filter, group, link, and compare, enabling the researcher to perform such human actions as infer, make connec- tions, identify patterns and relationships, interpret, and build theory with the data (Lewins & Silver, 2007, p. 13). Figure 1.4 illustrates a sample MAXQDA Code Relations Browser window, which enables you to determine possible interrelationships among coded data (Kuckartz, 2007).The varying sizes of the squares within the matrix indicate the relative frequency of such matches. CAQDAS also permits the researcher to shift quickly back and forth between multiple analytic tasks, such as coding, analytic memo writing, and exploring pat- terns in progress.Add to this the software’s ability to recode,uncode,rename,delete, move,merge,group,and assign different codes to shorter and longer passages of text with a few mouse clicks and keystrokes during Second Cycle Coding, and the advantages of CAQDAS over paper and pencil soon become apparent. Rather than presenting in this section an extended discussion of CAQDAS’s specific applications with coding and data analysis, additional references will be made on an “as relevant” basis throughout the rest of this manual. Since most readers of this book are more than likely newcomers to qualitative data analysis, I assume that manual coding will be the first method you employ.Thus, I pre- sent the coding profiles with that assumption in mind.Those with experience or expertise in CAQDAS programs can adapt the coding principles described in this manual into their particular software package’s active files and documents. Solo and Team Coding Coding in most qualitative studies is a solitary act – the “lone ethnographer” intimately at work with her data (Galman, 2007) – but larger fieldwork pro- jects may involve a team. THE CODING MANUAL FOR QUALITATIVE RESEARCHERS26 Saldana-3784-Ch-01:Saldana-3784-Ch-01.qxp 9/26/2008 7:10 PM Page 26 Coding collaboratively Writers of joint research projects advocate that coding in these cases can and should be a collaborative effort (Erickson & Stull, 1998; Guest & MacQueen, 2008). Multiple minds bring multiple ways of analyzing and interpreting the data: “a research team builds codes and coding builds a team through the creation of shared interpretation and understanding of the phenomenon being studied” (Weston et al., 2001, p. 382). Provocative questions are posed for consideration that could possibly generate new and richer codes (Olesen et al., 1994). Ultimately, team members must coordinate and insure that their sometimes indi- vidual coding efforts harmonize, particularly if a central data base and CAQDAS system are employed. MacQueen et al. (2008, p. 132) strongly advise that one member of the team be assigned primary responsibility as “codebook editor” – the one who creates, updates, revises, and maintains the master list for the group. Those conducting action or community-based research can invite the study’s participants/stakeholders themselves into the analytic process as a collab- orative venture to provide a sense of ownership and investment in data analysis and its consequent recommendations for social change (Stringer, 1999). Northcutt & McCoy (2004) label focus group development of their own cat- egories of interest “affinities.” Children and adolescents, too, can be taught to investigate and analyze issues that relate to their social worlds (Alderson, 2000; Heiligman, 1998;Warren, 2000). Team members can both code their own and others’ data gathered in the field to cast a wider analytic net and provide a “reality check” for each other. For these types of collaborative ventures, intercoder agreement or interpretive con- vergence – the percentage at which different coders agree and remain consistent with their assignment of particular codes to particular data – is an important part of the process (see Bernard, 2006, pp. 512–15; Boyatzis, 1998, pp. 144–59; Hruschka et al., 2004; and Miles & Huberman, 1994, p. 64 for simple formulas). There is no standard or base percentage of agreement among qualitative AN INTRODUCTION TO CODES AND CODING 27 FIGURE 1.4 A Code Relations Browser screenshot from MAXQDA, v. 2007 (courtesy of MAXQDA/VERBI Software) Saldana-3784-Ch-01:Saldana-3784-Ch-01.qxp 9/26/2008 7:10 PM Page 27 the right words for your codes, categories, themes, concepts, and theories. Explore the origins of key words in an unabridged dictionary to find surprising new meanings (for example, did you know that the root word of hypocrite is “actor”?).A thesaurus review of a key word chosen as a code or category may introduce you to an even better – and more precise – word for your analysis. For an applied introduction to the cognitive skills and personal attributes necessary for coding and qualitative data analysis, see Appendix A’s exercises and simulations. On Method Thorough – even cursory – descriptions about the researcher’s code develop- ment and coding processes rarely make it into the methods section of a final report (but a dissertation writer should consider including his or her codebook as an appendix to the study).The majority of readers would most likely find the discussion tedious or irrelevant compared to the more important features, such as the major categories and findings. Plus, scholarly journals place length restric- tions on article manuscripts, so some components of the research story must be left out and, more often than not, codes and coding fall by the wayside. But in all honesty, I don’t think most of the academic community minds (cf. Stewart, 1998). I’m not advocating that published research should include what most feel is a behind-the-scenes matter. Just acknowledge that the long time and rigor- ous effort you put into, and joyous personal analytic growth you experience through, coding and analytic memo writing are private affairs between you and your data (cf. Constas, 1992).When you invite important guests to your home for dinner, you don’t ask them to appear two or three hours before the sched- uled serving time to watch you cook in the kitchen.They arrive just before the meal to feast on and enjoy what you’ve worked so hard to prepare. Yet, analogy aside, please don’t refer to or consider this manual a “cookbook” for your raw data.That suggests that the methods profiled here are like tested recipes guaranteed to produce successful dishes every time. Most methodolo- gists concur that coding is “an idiosyncratic enterprise” (Glesne, 2006, p. 153) and the “search for one perfect method of data analysis is fruitless” (Coffey & Atkinson, 1996, p. 2). Each qualitative study is context-specific and your data are unique, as are you and your creative abilities to code them. I don’t have the answers to your questions, but you and your data do. In good faith, I guarantee you some guidance and, if we’re both lucky, perhaps some insight. (I jokingly mused to myself whether this manual might be disparagingly tagged by some as “the Cliff’s Notes of qualitative data analysis” or Coding for Dummies. Either way, as a pragmatist I’ll take that as a compliment about the work.) THE CODING MANUAL FOR QUALITATIVE RESEARCHERS30 Saldana-3784-Ch-01:Saldana-3784-Ch-01.qxp 9/26/2008 7:10 PM Page 30 Coding as craft I am very well aware of the interpretivist turn in qualitative inquiry and the movements toward narrative presentation and emancipatory social action through ethnographic fieldwork (Denzin & Lincoln, 2005). My own qualita- tive research projects, in fact, have ranged from the realist to the literary and from the confessional to the critical (van Maanen, 1988). But as a theatre prac- titioner, my discipline acknowledges that we must attend to both the art and craft of what we do to make our stage production work successful. And as a teacher educator, it’s my job to teach how to teach. Hence, I must have an attunement to various methods of classroom practice because my professional responsibilities require that I do. Some methods are organizational, managerial, time-efficient, and related to carefully planned curriculum design.Yet I empha- size to my students that such processes as the creative impulse, trusting your instincts, taking a risk, and just being empathetically human in the classroom are also legitimate methods of teaching practice. Education is complex; so is social life in general and so is qualitative inquiry in particular. This heightened, ever-present awareness of craft, of “how to,” transfers into my research work ethic. I have become both humbly and keenly aware not only of what I’m doing but why I’m doing it. A metacognition of method, even in an emergent, inductive-oriented, and socially conscious enterprise such as qualitative inquiry, is vitally important.This awareness comes with time and experience (and trial and error), but development can be accelerated if you have some preparatory knowledge of “how to.” I hope this manual smoothes your learning curve a bit and assists with your professional and personal growth as a researcher. This introduction focused on codes and coding.There is an accompany- ing heuristic with this process – writing analytic memos, the subject of the next chapter. AN INTRODUCTION TO CODES AND CODING 31 Saldana-3784-Ch-01:Saldana-3784-Ch-01.qxp 9/26/2008 7:10 PM Page 31