Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Lecture Notes on Institutional Drivers of Conflict | ESP 172, Study notes of Environmental Science

Material Type: Notes; Professor: Lubell; Class: Public Lands Mgmt; Subject: Environmental Science & Policy; University: University of California - Davis; Term: Unknown 1989;

Typology: Study notes

Pre 2010

Uploaded on 07/31/2009

koofers-user-twd
koofers-user-twd 🇺🇸

4.8

(4)

10 documents

1 / 8

Toggle sidebar

Related documents


Partial preview of the text

Download Lecture Notes on Institutional Drivers of Conflict | ESP 172 and more Study notes Environmental Science in PDF only on Docsity! Institutional Drivers of Conflict (Nie, Chap 1) • Scarcity: 2.39% of land is wilderness, 1% of Tallgrass Prarie, 2%  of historic griz range; the “last best places” • Intermixed ownership: Logging checkerboards, School trust,  split‐estate • Budgets:  Extraction incentives, shortfalls • Adversarial governance: Appeals, litigation • Public Land Law:  Vague and contradictory (e.g., Nat. Park  Organic Act 1916) • Mistrust:  Enviros. and USFS discretion Public Discourse Drivers of Conflict • Surrogate issues: Northern Spotted Owl and Timber  wars • Competing frames:  Economic and ecological views on  forest health, symbolic issues • Place‐based values:  Native American sites • Scientific disagreement:  value of old growth • Political grandstanding:  Crisis strategies, polarization • Media coverage:  Drama vs. substance Is all of this conflict undesirable? Reform: Comprehensive Review ¢ Public Land Law Review Commission ¢ Last convened over 40 years ago ¢ Most likely outcome would be creating of new legislation Reform: Administrative Planning Recognition that agencies are political creatures Courts and public opinion grant political discretion; less “scientification” of politics Planning reform to focus on efficiency; e.g. Bush proposed NFMA planning rules that avoids many NEPA requirements Forest-plans not subject to NEPA; only projects Reform: Collaboration Decentralized stakeholder groups formulate policy recommendations Beyond a reactive approach to public participation; notice-and-comment rulemaking Allows consideration of ecosystems, reduces conflict Local versus national accountability
Docsity logo



Copyright Š 2024 Ladybird Srl - Via Leonardo da Vinci 16, 10126, Torino, Italy - VAT 10816460017 - All rights reserved