Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Liberalism, Democracy, and Democratic Peace Theory, Lecture notes of International Relations

The political theories of liberalism, democracy, and democratic peace theory. It explores the views of influential thinkers such as Adam Smith, John Locke, Immanuel Kant, and Woodrow Wilson. The document also examines the characteristics of democratic countries and the factors that contribute to peace between them. It discusses the role of international institutions, non-state actors, and the importance of absolute gains over relative gains. The document also explores the concept of democratization and its impact on the likelihood of war.

Typology: Lecture notes

2020/2021

Available from 02/12/2023

esaul5163
esaul5163 🇺🇸

5 documents

1 / 4

Toggle sidebar

Related documents


Partial preview of the text

Download Liberalism, Democracy, and Democratic Peace Theory and more Lecture notes International Relations in PDF only on Docsity! Liberalism ● Adam Smith, John Locke, Immanuel Kant, Woodrow Wilson ● Views human nature as optimistic; optimistic about progress in international relations ● The state of nature, regardless to the system of governance in the international system, is oriented around desire for peace ● Peace is normal, war is abnormal ● Believe in establishing international institutions and spreading democracy ● Non-state actors are important (e.g. individuals, multinational firms, INGOs, IGOs) ● Emphasizes absolute gains over relative gains ● Believe in the domestic analogy→ what is true in the domestic system can be true in the international system ● Internal characteristics of states are crucial in understanding their foreign policy Liberalism & Anarchy ● Under anarchy, is cooperation possible? How do states increase the likelihood of cooperation? Tit for Tat Strategy ● Robert Axelrod Classical Liberalism: Theory of governments within states ● Focuses on different characteristics of government within states ● Democratic peace theory Institutional Liberalism (Neoliberalism): Theory of good governance between states ● Good governance→ establish more international organizations ● Emphasize international regimes and the role of interdependent trade ● Change the structure of the international system so states can better cooperate Immanuel Kant ● Wrote “Perpetual Peace” ○ Republican constitutions ■ “The civil constitution of every state should be republican” ■ Representative governments with separation of powers, private property, and market-based economies ■ Under representative governments, political leaders are accountable for their decisions ○ Pacific union: Federation of Free States ■ “The Law of Nations Shall be Founded on a Federation of Free States” ■ The federation of free states facilitates cooperation and provides collective defense ○ Cosmopolitan law ■ “The Law of World Citizenship Shall Be Limited to Conditions of Universal Hospitality” ■ Republican states should adhere to cosmopolitan law that always affords hospitality to other foreign nations ■ Free trade; economic interdependence Democracy ● Regular elections ● Competitive political parties ● Near-universal adult suffrage ● Basic political and individual rights ● Polity score→ scale that measures a nation’s degree of democracy ○ Developed by Gurr in 1960 Democratic Peace Theory ● Democratic countries are less likely to go to war against each other ● “Absence of war between democratic states comes as close as anything we have to an empirical law in international relations”- Jack Levy ● Normative Cultural Argument: ○ Common political culture and norms make democracies less likely to go to war with each other ○ Tolerance for different ideas; respect for the freedom; illegitimacy of using force ○ Democratic countries can “externalize” norms and culture from the domestic to the international domain ○ Democratic countries expect other democratic countries to share the same norms and cultures ● Structural Institutional Argument ○ Institutional restraints on executive branches in both countries make them less likely to go to war ○ Congress has “the power of the purse” over the military ○ Press, interest groups, and nongovernmental organizations can freely express their opinions and make an impact on a war decision Democratizing vs Democratic Country ● Democratization increases the likelihood of war ● Democratizing states are not fully equipped with democratic institutions (strong military; weak legislature)
Docsity logo



Copyright © 2024 Ladybird Srl - Via Leonardo da Vinci 16, 10126, Torino, Italy - VAT 10816460017 - All rights reserved