Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Mandatory Arbitration Clauses: A Limitation of Justice for Consumers - Prof. Lara Grow, Study notes of Business and Labour Law

The issue of mandatory arbitration clauses in contracts, focusing on the case of jamie leigh jones and her experience with kbr. These clauses prevent consumers from accessing the court system and instead force them into private arbitration, which is often biased in favor of the opposing party. The document also highlights the high percentage of americans bound by these clauses and the low success rate for consumers in arbitration.

Typology: Study notes

2010/2011

Uploaded on 11/03/2011

ltchacko09
ltchacko09 🇺🇸

1 document

1 / 1

Toggle sidebar

Related documents


Partial preview of the text

Download Mandatory Arbitration Clauses: A Limitation of Justice for Consumers - Prof. Lara Grow and more Study notes Business and Labour Law in PDF only on Docsity! Chapter 5 In-Class Video Notes  Mandatory Arbitration  Forced her to speak against the court even if she was wronged  Keep the public out of the courts  The clause says you can’t go to court but instead arbitration  Its like you cant go to court against a company that has mistreated you  When you sign any contract, there wont be any reference to the arbitration with the bill or the contract  Arbitration Clause has become Mandatory  Really never had a choice in the matter  More than a 1/3 of America are bound by this clause  Halliburton and KBR- Jamie Leigh Jones  Was put in an all male baric when he had there  She was raped by another male that she was put in board with  KBR said she can continue working there or be terminated  Because of the arbitration cause she couldn’t really fight in court and expect to win  Arbitration is extremely biased  Because it is done in a private court where the opposite party such as KBR or a credit card company gets to pick the judge  Rigged against the consumers  Consumer may win less than 10% of the time
Docsity logo



Copyright © 2024 Ladybird Srl - Via Leonardo da Vinci 16, 10126, Torino, Italy - VAT 10816460017 - All rights reserved