Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Economic Regulation and Antitrust Laws: Terms, Definitions, and Landmark Cases, Quizzes of Microeconomics

Definitions and explanations of key terms related to economic regulation and antitrust laws. Topics include the regulation and deregulation of prices and quantities in industries such as utilities, airlines, and trucking, as well as antitrust laws that prevent monopolies and price fixing. The document also covers various types of mergers and practices that can restrict competition, and landmark cases that have shaped antitrust law.

Typology: Quizzes

2010/2011

Uploaded on 12/09/2011

ziegle51
ziegle51 🇺🇸

11 documents

1 / 7

Toggle sidebar

Related documents


Partial preview of the text

Download Economic Regulation and Antitrust Laws: Terms, Definitions, and Landmark Cases and more Quizzes Microeconomics in PDF only on Docsity! TERM 1 Economic Regulation DEFINITION 1 Includes the regulation and deregulation of prices and quantities, in industries as utilities, airlines, and trucking. TERM 2 Antitrust Laws DEFINITION 2 Breaks a large firm into smaller pieces, to overcome the problems of a monopoly TERM 3 Regulatory Lag DEFINITION 3 Tf economic conditions change, the prices the firm are allowed to charge may not keep pace. TERM 4 Deregulation DEFINITION 4 Fed government removing rules that had restricted competition TERM 5 Hub-And-Spoke Route Systems DEFINITION 5 Under this type of system, an airline sends a great deal of trafic thru its "hubs". TERM 6 Cross-Subsidization DEFINITION 6 Cross subsidization is the practice of charging higher prices to one group of consumers in order to subsidize lower prices for another group. TERM 7 Sherman Act (1890) DEFINITION 7 Makes it illegeal for competing companies to collude to fix prices. Also prevents monopolies or an attempt to monopolize. TERM 8 Northern Security Case of 1904 DEFINITION 8 The Supreme court used the Sherman Act so 2 railroads could not merge. TERM 9 American Tobacco Case DEFINITION 9 A few weeks after the standard oil case the supreme court decided to break James B Dukes Tobacco Trust into 16 smaller companies. TERM 10 Standard Oil Case DEFINITION 10 Supreme court broke John D. Rockefeller's Standard Oil Trust into 33 different companies. TERM 21 U.S Steel Case DEFINITION 21 1920 the Supreme court ruled that the US Steel had not acted badly (monopolistic wise) therefore the rule of reason was created. TERM 22 Rule of Reason DEFINITION 22 A firm will not be found guilty unless it had behaved in an unreasonable way. TERM 23 ALCOA Case (1945) DEFINITION 23 Rule of reason was dramatically reversed. TERM 24 Brown Shoe Case (1962) DEFINITION 24 A merger with two shoe companies (Brown and Kinney) that when combined would have had less than 4% of the shoe retailing market. The supreme court stopped the merger. TERM 25 Von's Grocery Case DEFINITION 25 Court ruled againt a merger between 2 grocery stores (Von's Grocery Store and Shopping Bag Food Stores) although the combined market share only would have been about 7.5%. TERM 26 IBM Case DEFINITION 26 The gov't charged International Business Machines Corp with a # of anti-competitive prices. TERM 27 Consent Decrees DEFINITION 27 negotiated settlements between the govt and a company. TERM 28 Xerox Case DEFINITION 28 case ended in 1975 with a consent decree, under which Xerox Corp agreed to license its photocopying patents to its competitors. TERM 29 AT&T Case (1982) DEFINITION 29 One of the most famous antitrust cases in recent years. The decree which went in effect in 1984 required AT&T to divest itself of its local telephone operating companies. AT&T still dominated long distance service but in terms of local service it fell to other smaller phone companies. TERM 30 Microsoft Case DEFINITION 30 Microsoft was violating antitrust laws. Microsoft used its near- monopoly in the market for personal cpu operating systems as a means for creating market power in other markets, such as internet browsing software. Judge Thomas Jackson ruled to split icrosoft into 2 companies BUT the Appeals court threw out the order and gave the case to another judge. Microsoft ended up not having any actions against them.
Docsity logo



Copyright © 2024 Ladybird Srl - Via Leonardo da Vinci 16, 10126, Torino, Italy - VAT 10816460017 - All rights reserved