Download Mass murder in bhopal and more Summaries Sociology in PDF only on Docsity! ECONOMIC
AND
POLITICAL
WEEKLY
Founder-Editor: Sachin Chaudhuri
Vol XIX No 49 December 8, 1984
Armed Forces: Above Criticism? —Trade
Policy: Fiscal in Fashion—West Asia: Per-
manent Interests—Sri Lanka: Whose
Ctensive? 2058
Business 2060
Statistics 2062
Companies 2063
Capital View
Defeating the Political Hijackers
—Romesh Thapar 2065
From Our Correspondents
When Delhi Burnt
~Amiya Rao
The Elections: Voting Rights of the Poor
Bharat Dogra
Civil Lidertes: Public Discussion and
Contempt of Court
—A G Noorani 2070
Faiz Ahmed Faiz
~Feroz Ahmed 2071
Health: Retreat on Depo-Provera?
~Padma Prakash 2072
United Kingdom: Coal Strike: Larger
Issues ot Stake
—Michael Jacobs 2073
Reviews
An Iconoclast Hindu
Balraj Puri 2075
Government by Ordinances
—Ashok H Desai 2076
Special Articles
Culture, State and the Rediscovery of
Indian Politics
~Ashis Nandi 2079
Politics of Agrarian Unrest in UP: Who
Co-Opted Whom?
—Haroid A Gould 2084
Technological Change and Women's
Work Participation and Demographic
Behaviour: A Case Study of Three
Fishing Villages
—leela Gulati 2089
Discussion 2095
ECONOMIC AND POLITICAL WEEKLY
Skylark 284 Shahid Bhagatsingh Road
400 038
Phones 266072 956073
Grams Econweekly
Editor Krishna Raj
Assistant Editors Gautam Naviakha
Ignatius Chithelen
Editorial Staff
K Vijayakumar, Cleatus Antony
Manager T D Sell
Mass Murder in Bhopal
TS it only methyl isecyanate, the deadly gas which was allowed to leak out in vast quantities
from the Bhopal factory of Union Carbide, the American multinational, which has, already
at the time of writing, sent over 2,500 persons to a most painful death, maimed countless
thousand others, permanently perhaps, and threatened indeterminable genetic damage to
the yet unborn? The mass of technical detail which has become available about methy! iso-
cyanate and related chemical substances, their roles in the production process employed by
the death-dealing plant, the malfunctioning of different parts of the plant’s equipment and
so on have tended to create the impression that the tragedy in Bhopal is primarily a tech-
nological phenomenon. But has not as much information of a different kind too become
available to suggest that it is the larger framework of social relations within which the Union
Carbide factory was established and has been operating which has wreaked havoc on the
people of Bhopal, a very large number of them impoverished inhabitants of slum settlements
in the plant’s vicinity?
It is necessary to raise this question because there is already 2 tendency to suggest by im-
plication that, give or take some random human errofs on the part of lowly plant operatives,
the Bhopal tragedy, terrible as it has been, is the price that has to be paid for development,
for the green revolution, for increases in agricultural production. This formulation, one may
be certain, will be put forward more explicitly and brazenly in the days to come, Carried
to its logical conclusion, the suggestion would be that figuratively speaking many of the poorer
victims of methyl isocyanate in Bhopal’s slums were alive in the first place because they had
been provided with food to eat by the economic and technological advance represented by
the Union Carbide plant and its use of methyl isocyanate to produce pesticides. Simultaneously,
the details of the malfunctioning of the vent scrubber which would otherwise have rendered
the methyl isocyanate quite harmiess, the non-activation of the arrangements for burning
up the rogue gas, the failure of the factory's disaster alarm mechanism, and so on, are in-
tended to suggest that it was all an unfortunate accident, the probability of whose occur-
rence can be minimised if not eliminated altogether by more foolproof and effectively func-
tioning safety devices and procedures,
It is possible in the abstract to conceive of relatively effective devices for pollution con-
trol, of locating potentially hazardous manufacturing facilities at a distance from popula-
tion concentrations and of even forsaking more dangerous technologies and products in favour
of less risky ones. But how likely is it that all or any of these things will be done in the prevailing
economic and political set-up? We now know that the administrator of the Bhopal municipal
corporation had in 1975 issued a notice seeking to shift the Union Carbide plant out of the
city; instead it was the official who got shunted out to another job. We also know that begin-
ning from 1980 or even earlier there had occurred a number of cases of leakage of poisonous
gases causing casualties, some even fatal, among the factory's workmen. These cases were
written about in the press, the Madhya Pradesh government certainly knew of them and they
were even discussed in the state assembly. Yet no action by the government—and, of course,
the company—followed and Union Carbide was able to hush up matters, in one case reportedly
by persuading the family of a worker who had died of gas poisoning to move to Rajasthan.
Going further back, the economic, technical and legal departments of the Union government
had considered Union Carbide’s application for setting up the Bhopal plant and had ap-
proved it, including its location and the technology proposed to be employed, and had chosen
to find nothing wanting in the safety equipment proposed to be installed, We also know now
of the cozy relationship which exists between Union Carbide and the Madhya Pradesh govern-
ment, the revealed tip of which comprises lucrative contracts and high-paid positions in the
company for ruling politicians and senior civil servants and their relatives and the hospitali-
ty of the company’s lavish guest house for local power-wielders and the Congress(1).
In the context of the human misery caused by the Bhopal disaster these details do assume
rather lurid colours, but otherwise they are commonplace features of the operations of private
business and its relations with the political and administrative authorities. Therefore, though
in the wake of what has happened in Bhopal the air may be thick just now with brave talk
of tightening up safety precautions at plants which use or produce hazardous substances
wherever in the country they might be, the prospect of such measure being actually taken
by industry and enforced by the government has to be realistically assessed taking into con-
sideration the nature of the political-economic system which allowed Union Carbide to get away
for years with arrangements which produced the colossal tragedy of the night of December 2,
The capitalists’ imperativee of capital accumulation and profit maximisation necessarily
Tender the possidie consequences of technologies and products 0. health and safety, of their
own workers and of the people at large, matters of secondary, indeed minimal, importance.
It may sound frivolous but it is by no means far-fetched that between installing additional
safety equipment and setting up a lavish guest house for the use of powerful politicians and
bureaucrats @ la Union Carbide, the capitalists’ cost-benefit calculation could invariably favour
the latter, given the class specification of ‘costs’ and “benefits. And when the costs and benefits
are computed not in this country but at the headquarters of multinational corporations in
Connecticut, USA, or wherever else, the results get perverse enough to justify, for instance,
the shipping out to countries like India of products so patently deleterious to public health
and safety that their use has been prohibited in the multinationals’ own home countries.
It is the network of relationships among the powerfu! multinationals, our own indigenous.
capitalist class and the governments, our own as well as those of the developed countri
to which belong the multinationals, which, as much as the methyl isocyanate itself, is respon-
sible for the mass murder in Bhopal.