Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Mathematical Induction (Examples Worksheet), Study notes of Calculus

(Don't use ghetto P(n) lingo). 2. Write (Base Case) and prove the base case holds for n=a. 3. Write (Induction Hypothesis) say ...

Typology: Study notes

2021/2022

Uploaded on 08/05/2022

hal_s95
hal_s95 🇵🇭

4.4

(620)

8.6K documents

1 / 8

Toggle sidebar

Related documents


Partial preview of the text

Download Mathematical Induction (Examples Worksheet) and more Study notes Calculus in PDF only on Docsity! Mathematical Induction (Examples Worksheet) The Method: 1. State the claim you are proving. (Don’t use ghetto P(n) lingo). 2. Write (Base Case) and prove the base case holds for n=a. 3. Write (Induction Hypothesis) say “Assume ___ for some 𝑘 ≥ 𝑎”. 4. Write the WWTS: _________________ 5. Prove the (k+1)th case is true. You MUST at some point use your induction hypothesis in this step. STATE EXACTLY when it’s used. 6. Conclude that the claim holds for all 𝑛 ≥ 𝑎. And QED if deserved! “Some” is a very important word here. MATHEMATICAL INDUCTION PRACTICE Claim: 1 + 3 + 5 + . . . + (2n-1) = n2 We start with the base case. This is usually 0 or 1 if not specified. Start with some examples below to make sure you believe the claim. PROOF: (Base Case): LHS: RHS: (Induction hypothesis): Assume 1+ 3 + . . . + (2k-1) = k2 for some _____. WWTS: Let’s do a geometric proof below: (HINT: draw a 3x3 square composed of 9 balls. Group the balls in L-shapes of size 1, 3, and 5.) Claim: 3n ≤ 3n for all natural numbers n. Start with some examples below to make sure you believe the claim. PROOF: (Base Case): n=1 LHS: 3 RHS: 3 Since 3 ≤ 3, the base case is done. (Inductive hypothesis): Assume that 3k ≤ 3k for some k≥1. WWTS: Then 3(k+1) = = 3k+1. Then, 3n ≤ 3n for all natural numbers n. Notice that the first thing I did was “extract” the 3k from with the 3k+1. Then I substituted using the inductive assumption. Then I substituted a larger quantity for the 3 (which is fine because I am proving a < inequality). Then I added a positive amount on, which allowed me to arrive at the RHS of what I wanted to show. Notice that “working backwards” from the end goal (that is, the 3k+1 in this case) is often helpful when doing proofs by induction on inequalities! Claim: 2+3n < 2n for all n > 3. Start with some examples below to make sure you believe the claim. PROOF: (Base Case): LHS: RHS: (Inductive hypothesis): Assume that WWTS: Claim: 5n-1 is divisible by 4 Start with some examples below to make sure you believe the claim. PROOF: (Base Case): LHS: RHS: (Inductive hypothesis): Assume that WWTS:
Docsity logo



Copyright © 2024 Ladybird Srl - Via Leonardo da Vinci 16, 10126, Torino, Italy - VAT 10816460017 - All rights reserved