Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

GOVT 203 Midterm Grading Sheet for Spring 2004 - Introduction to Comparative Politics - Pr, Exams of Comparative Law and Politics

A grading sheet for a midterm exam in the introduction to comparative politics course offered by professor roever at the college of william and mary during the spring 2004 semester. The grading criteria for identification questions and short answers, with points ranging from 5 to 15.

Typology: Exams

Pre 2010

Uploaded on 03/11/2009

koofers-user-1zr
koofers-user-1zr 🇺🇸

1

(1)

10 documents

1 / 1

Toggle sidebar

Related documents


Partial preview of the text

Download GOVT 203 Midterm Grading Sheet for Spring 2004 - Introduction to Comparative Politics - Pr and more Exams Comparative Law and Politics in PDF only on Docsity! College of William and Mary Professor Roever Department of Government Semester: Spring 2004 GOVT 203: Introduction to Comparative Politics Midterm Grading Sheet Name:______________________________ PART 1. IDENTIFICATIONS (5 answers @ 5 points each) _____ / 25 points Points Criteria 5 Term is properly defined; term is clearly and accurately related to the study of comparative politics; and specific readings and/or countries are accurately cited, when appropriate 4 Definition and significance of concept are essentially correct, but there is some lack of clarity or some minor error; or specific readings and/or countries are not accurately cited, if appropriate 3 Definition of concept is vague or incorrect, or there is significant lack of clarity in explaining the concept’s significance; and specific readings and/or countries are not accurately cited, if appropriate 2 Definition of concept is vague or incorrect; and there is significant lack of clarity in explaining the concept’s significance, and specific readings and/or countries are not accurately cited, if appropriate 1 Minimal attempt to offer an answer 0 No attempt to offer an answer PART 2. SHORT ANSWERS (3 answers @ 15 points each) _____ / 45 points Points Criteria 15 Responds to all parts of the question; responses are accurate and specific throughout; references to readings, lectures, films, presentations, cables, and class discussions are accurate and appropriate throughout; and responses are clearly and cogently written 13 Responds to some parts of the question; or responses are not accurate and specific throughout; or references to readings, lectures, films, presentations, cables, and class discussions are not accurate and appropriate throughout; or responses are slightly unclear or unconvincing 11 Responds to some parts of the question; and/or responses are not accurate and specific throughout; and/or references to readings, lectures, films, presentations, cables, and class discussions are not accurate and appropriate throughout; and/or responses are slightly unclear or unconvincing (i.e. two of the four conditions hold) 9 Three of the above conditions hold 7 Four of the above conditions hold 4 Responds to only a minor portion of the question 0 No attempt to offer an answer MIDTERM GRADE _____ / 70 points Grading scale: A 65-70; A- 63-64; B+ 62; B 58-61; B- 56-57; C+ 55; C 51-54; C- 49-50; D+ 48; D 44-47; D- 42-43; F 41 and below
Docsity logo



Copyright © 2024 Ladybird Srl - Via Leonardo da Vinci 16, 10126, Torino, Italy - VAT 10816460017 - All rights reserved