Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Class #8 Solutions: Stat Mech, Quantum Mech, Special Relativity, Advanced Topics, Study notes of Physics

Solutions for various problems in statistical mechanics, quantum mechanics, special relativity, and advanced topics. It covers topics such as heat capacity, oscilloscope, atomic orbitals, gyromagnetic ratio, planck energy, momentum, rotational energy level, strangeness, lorentz transformation, and dimensional analysis.

Typology: Study notes

2010/2011

Uploaded on 10/04/2011

danmarino
danmarino 🇺🇸

4.2

(11)

35 documents

1 / 8

Toggle sidebar

Partial preview of the text

Download Class #8 Solutions: Stat Mech, Quantum Mech, Special Relativity, Advanced Topics and more Study notes Physics in PDF only on Docsity! Solutions for class #8 from Yosumism website Yosumism website: http://grephysics.yosunism.com Problem 15: Statistical Mechanics }Heat Capacity Note that this problem wants the regime of high temperatures, and thus the answer is not from classical thermodynamics, but rather . The problem suggests that a quantized linear oscillator is used. From the energy relation , one can write a partition function and do the usual Stat Mech jig. Since one is probably too lazy to calculate entropy, one can find the specific heat (at constant volume) from , where , where is the number of particles, is the Boltzmann constant. There are actually three contributions to the specific heat at constant volume. . Chunk out the math and take the limit of high temperature to find that . YOUR NOTES: Problem 17: Lab Methods }Oscilloscope This problem can be solved by elimination. Since one is given two waves, one with twice the frequency of the other, one can approximate the superposed wave (which shows up on the oscilloscope) as . The summed wave no longer looks like a sine wave. Instead, it looks like a series of larger amplitude humps alternating with regions of smaller amplitudes. However, since one is not supplied with a graphing calculator on the test, one can qualitatively eliminate the other choices based on the equation above. It is obviously not choices (D) and (E) since the superposition is still a one-to-one function. It isn't choice (C) or (B) since those are just sin waves (cosine waves are just off by a phase), and one knows that the superposed wave would look more complicated than that. Thus, one arrives at choice (A), which is a zoomed-in-view of the superposition above. YOUR NOTES: Problem 76: Atomic }Orbitals The total angular momentum is given by where l is the orbital angular momentum and s is the spin angular momentum. (Note that, to an extent, l and s can be viewed as magnitudes, while and as directions.) The total orbital angular momentum is just , since one should recall that . The spin angular momentum is just because one has three electrons.(Electrons are fermions that have spin .) Thus, the total angular momentum is , as in choice (A). Now, . Plug everything in to get the right answer. . Converting J to eV, one has eV, as in choice (B). YOUR NOTES: Problem 91: Advanced Topics }Strangeness Elimination time: (A) Only muons, neutrinos and electrons are leptons. Moreover, the pi-meson is a meson, which is a hadron with baryon number 0. (Hadrons interact with the strong nuclear force, while leptons interact with the weak nuclear force, em force, and possibly even the gravitation force.) (B) The lambda has spin 1/2, as do most baryons. (The mesons have spin 0, but positive strangeness numbers.) (C) Lepton number is already conserved, since none of the particles involved have non-zero lepton numbers. Thus, introducing a neutrino would violate (electron) lepton number conservation. (D) No reason why... (E) Only hadrons have non-zero strangeness (strangeness was proposed when strong particles interact as if weak particles---i.e., instead of having super-fast decay times characteristic of strong-force particles, their decay times appeared as if weak-force decays). Protons have 0 strangeness, as do pi-mesons, even though they are both hadrons. However, the lambda has -1 strangeness. Thus, strangeness is not conserved. YOUR NOTES: Problem 94: Special Relativity }Lorentz Transformation Lorentz transformations are given by Factoring out the terms, choice (C) is , and thus and . Since the equation for t fits the form above, this is a valid Lorentz Transformation. YOUR NOTES: Problem 95: Advanced Topics }Dimensional Analysis The final units must be . One is given The combination gives the right units as well as answer choice (C). YOUR NOTES: Problem 97: Advanced Topics }Solid State Physics This is a result one remembers by heart from a decent solid state physics course. It has to do with band gaps, which is basically the core of such a course. Then again, one can easily derive it from scratch upon recalling some basic principles: , , where k is the wave vector, E is the energy, m is the mass, and p is the momentum. From the above, one has . Set the two 's equal to get . Cancel out the 's to get , after differentiating with respect to k on both sides. Alternatively, one can try it Kittel's way: Start with . Then, . Thus, the effective mass is defined by . YOUR NOTES:
Docsity logo



Copyright © 2024 Ladybird Srl - Via Leonardo da Vinci 16, 10126, Torino, Italy - VAT 10816460017 - All rights reserved