Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Musa Software Reliability Models - Lecture Slides | CSE 565, Study Guides, Projects, Research of Computer Science

Material Type: Project; Professor: Tsai; Class: Software Verif/Validation/Test; Subject: Computer Science and Engineering; University: Arizona State University - Tempe; Term: Unknown 1989;

Typology: Study Guides, Projects, Research

Pre 2010

Uploaded on 09/02/2009

koofers-user-6jm
koofers-user-6jm 🇺🇸

10 documents

1 / 7

Toggle sidebar

Related documents


Partial preview of the text

Download Musa Software Reliability Models - Lecture Slides | CSE 565 and more Study Guides, Projects, Research Computer Science in PDF only on Docsity! 1 1 Musa Software Reliability Models Wei-Tek Tsai Department of Computer Science and Engineering Arizona State University Tempe, AZ 85287 2 Contents • Introduction to reliability models. • Musa Software Reliability models – Basic execution time model – Logarithmic execution time model • Applying the models to software projects. • Benefits and limitations of the Musa Software Reliability Models 2 3 Software Reliability Models • Reliability is the probability that a given software will run error-free for a specified period of time (IEEE definition). • Software Reliability Models – used to predict software reliability early during development – Main focus is on fault removal – Composed of assumptions, factors and a mathematical function relating reliability to the factors 4 Importance of Software Reliability Models • Quantify many characteristics of the failure process, such as: – average number of failures experienced at any point in time – average number of failures in a time interval – failure intensity at any point in time – probability distribution of failure intervals. • Such information can be used to: – Evaluate development status during test phases of project. – Monitor the operational performance of software. – Control design changes and new feature addition 5 9 Step 3 Selection of tests – Deterministic basis – each test case and its sequence mentioned with certainty – Random basis – more than one test case is possible at a single point of execution with a certain probability of occurrence 10 Step 4 • Parameter determination for the execution and calendar time components of the model. – Execution time components are characterized by two parameters: • Initial failure intensity • Total number of failures – Parameters can be predicted from software characteristics and the development process. – Parameters may also be estimated statistically from failure data, once execution starts. 6 11 Step 5 • Computing required metrics and performance factors. – Performed by system engineers. – Three types of calculations are common to most applications: 1. System test duration 2. System test resource requirements and cost 3. Operational cost of failure 12 Benefits and Limitations of the Musa Models • The use of both execution time and calendar time. • Concepts from several models have been incorporated. You can enjoy most of their advantages. • Easy and simple to understand. • Predicts software reliability satisfactorily. • Thoroughly developed and widely applied in actual projects. • Several programs available to aid in implementing the model. • Does not provide accurate estimation for very small projects (< 5000 LOC) 7 13 Resources • Musa, Iannino, Okumoto, “ Software Reliability: Measurement, Prediction, Application”, McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1987, ISBN 0-07-044093-X. • Musa J. D., 1975. “A Theory of Software Reliability and its Application”, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, SE – 1(3), pp. 312-327. • Musa J. D., 1979. “Validation of Execution Time Theory of Software Reliability”, IEEE Transactions on Reliability, R-28(3), pp. 181-191. • Musa J. D. and K. Okumoto, 1984, “A Logarithmic Poisson Execution Time Model for Software Reliability Measurement”, Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Software Engineering, Orlando, pp. 230-238. • Pan J., Spring 99, “Software Reliability”, • http://www-2.cs.cmu.edu/~koopman/des_s99/sw_reliability. • http://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/software/1998/musa-19990128/ • http://www.softdim.com/psqt00north/tutorials-m.htm • members.aol.com/~johnDMusa • http://www.utexas.edu/coe/sqi/newsletter/winter96.html
Docsity logo



Copyright © 2024 Ladybird Srl - Via Leonardo da Vinci 16, 10126, Torino, Italy - VAT 10816460017 - All rights reserved